Literature DB >> 19823884

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided transsphenoidal surgery for giant pituitary adenomas.

Fabian Baumann1, Christoph Schmid, René-Ludwig Bernays.   

Abstract

Giant pituitary adenomas (GPAs), defined as >/=40 mm in one extension, present a challenging subgroup of pituitary adenomas in terms of radical tumor removal and complication rates. The potential impact of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) is investigated in a consecutive series and the results compared to the literature. From November 2004 until February 2005, six (five male) patients were operated for GPAs via an iMRI-guided transsphenoidal approach in the PoleStar N20. Clinical, endocrinological, and neuroradiological outcomes (at 3 months and yearly postoperative over 4 years) were assessed. Mean age was 46 years (range, 34-60). All patients presented with preoperative visual field defects, five with pituitary failure. Five adenomas were clinically nonfunctioning, one was producing GH and TSH. Preoperative imaging showed invasion of the cavernous sinus in all and extension to the interventricular foramen in two patients (one with occlusive hydrocephalus). Resection was total in four and subtotal (small cavernous sinus remnants) in two patients, leading to transsphenoidal reoperation in one patient. Visual acuity and fields improved in all six patients. The patient with occlusive hydrocephalus developed a postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (subsequently revised), two patients developed temporary, one permanent central diabetes insipidus, and one of them transient hyponatremia. Compared to the preoperative situation, endocrine status in the long-term follow-up (mean, 25 months) remained unchanged in four and worsened in two. Two patients were considered not to require hormone replacement therapy. IMRI supports transsphenoidal resections of GPAs because residual adenoma and related risk structures are easily detected and localized intraoperatively, extending the restricted visual access of the microscope beyond mere surface anatomy to a three-dimensional view. More radical removal of adenomas in a single surgical session combined with low complication rates are accomplished. This may add to a favorable clinical and endocrinological outcome in GPAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19823884     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-009-0230-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  19 in total

1.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to determine the extent of resection of pituitary macroadenomas during transsphenoidal microsurgery.

Authors:  R J Bohinski; R E Warnick; M F Gaskill-Shipley; M Zuccarello; H R van Loveren; D W Kormos; J M Tew
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Adaptation of a standard low-field (0.3-T) system to the operating room: focus on pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Borimir J Darakchiev; John M Tew; Robert J Bohinski; Ronald E Warnick
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Giant pituitary adenomas: clinical characteristics and surgical results.

Authors:  J Garibi; I Pomposo; G Villar; S Gaztambide
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  Transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas in an intraoperative MRI unit.

Authors:  C H Martin; R Schwartz; F Jolesz; P M Black
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  Giant pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  H W Pia; E Grote; G Hildebrandt
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Combined transsphenoidal and pterional craniotomy approach to giant pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Cargill H Alleyne; Daniel Louis Barrow; Nelson Mobolanle Oyesiku
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2002-06

7.  Giant pituitary adenomas: role of radiotherapy.

Authors:  B J Fisher; L E Gaspar; B Noone
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Giant pituitary tumors: a study based on surgical treatment of 118 cases.

Authors:  Atul Goel; Trimurti Nadkarni; Dattatraya Muzumdar; Ketan Desai; Umesh Phalke; Praveen Sharma
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2004-05

9.  Characteristics of giant pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  E Grote
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Surgical treatment of giant pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  L Symon; J Jakubowski; B Kendall
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of non-functioning pituitary adenomas during transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Kunal S Patel; Yong Yao; Renzhi Wang; Bob S Carter; Clark C Chen
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 2.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during surgery for pituitary adenomas: pros and cons.

Authors:  Michael Buchfelder; Sven-Martin Schlaffer
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 3.  iMRI During Transsphenoidal Surgery.

Authors:  Prashant Chittiboina
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 4.  Epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of non-functioning pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Georgia Ntali; John A Wass
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 5.  Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of giant pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Ricardo J Komotar; Robert M Starke; Daniel M S Raper; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  On mixed reality environments for minimally invasive therapy guidance: systems architecture, successes and challenges in their implementation from laboratory to clinic.

Authors:  Cristian A Linte; Katherine P Davenport; Kevin Cleary; Craig Peters; Kirby G Vosburgh; Nassir Navab; Philip Eddie Edwards; Pierre Jannin; Terry M Peters; David R Holmes; Richard A Robb
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Three-dimensional volumetric measurements in defining endoscope-guided giant adenoma surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Muhammad Omar Chohan; Ariana M Levin; Ranjodh Singh; Zhiping Zhou; Carlos L Green; Jacob J Kazam; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Combined simultaneous transcranial and transsphenoidal resection of large-to-giant pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Gilberto Ka Kit Leung; Hing Yu Law; Kwun Ngai Hung; Yiu Wah Fan; Wai Man Lui
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  The safety and effectiveness of low field intraoperative MRI guidance in frameless stereotactic biopsies of brain tumours-design and interim analysis of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  M Czyż; P Tabakow; A Weiser; B E Lechowicz-Głogowska; L W Zub; W Jarmundowicz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 10.  Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of the skull base.

Authors:  Claudia F E Kirsch
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.