Literature DB >> 19822692

A hidden Markov random field model for genome-wide association studies.

Hongzhe Li1, Zhi Wei, John Maris.   

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are increasingly utilized for identifying novel susceptible genetic variants for complex traits, but there is little consensus on analysis methods for such data. Most commonly used methods include single single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis or haplotype analysis with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Since the SNPs in typical GWAS are often in linkage disequilibrium (LD), at least locally, Bonferroni correction of multiple comparisons often leads to conservative error control and therefore lower statistical power. In this paper, we propose a hidden Markov random field model (HMRF) for GWAS analysis based on a weighted LD graph built from the prior LD information among the SNPs and an efficient iterative conditional mode algorithm for estimating the model parameters. This model effectively utilizes the LD information in calculating the posterior probability that an SNP is associated with the disease. These posterior probabilities can then be used to define a false discovery controlling procedure in order to select the disease-associated SNPs. Simulation studies demonstrated the potential gain in power over single SNP analysis. The proposed method is especially effective in identifying SNPs with borderline significance at the single-marker level that nonetheless are in high LD with significant SNPs. In addition, by simultaneously considering the SNPs in LD, the proposed method can also help to reduce the number of false identifications of disease-associated SNPs. We demonstrate the application of the proposed HMRF model using data from a case-control GWAS of neuroblastoma and identify 1 new SNP that is potentially associated with neuroblastoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19822692      PMCID: PMC2800164          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  16 in total

1.  False discovery rate in linkage and association genome screens for complex disorders.

Authors:  Chiara Sabatti; Susan Service; Nelson Freimer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Robert J Klein; Caroline Zeiss; Emily Y Chew; Jen-Yue Tsai; Richard S Sackler; Chad Haynes; Alice K Henning; John Paul SanGiovanni; Shrikant M Mane; Susan T Mayne; Michael B Bracken; Frederick L Ferris; Jurg Ott; Colin Barnstable; Josephine Hoh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A haplotype map of the human genome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Efficient multilocus association testing for whole genome association studies using localized haplotype clustering.

Authors:  Brian L Browning; Sharon R Browning
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Incorporating gene networks into statistical tests for genomic data via a spatially correlated mixture model.

Authors:  Peng Wei; Wei Pan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Detecting haplotype effects in genomewide association studies.

Authors:  B E Huang; C I Amos; D Y Lin
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  A genome-wide association study identifies alleles in FGFR2 associated with risk of sporadic postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  David J Hunter; Peter Kraft; Kevin B Jacobs; David G Cox; Meredith Yeager; Susan E Hankinson; Sholom Wacholder; Zhaoming Wang; Robert Welch; Amy Hutchinson; Junwen Wang; Kai Yu; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Nick Orr; Walter C Willett; Graham A Colditz; Regina G Ziegler; Christine D Berg; Saundra S Buys; Catherine A McCarty; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Eugenia E Calle; Michael J Thun; Richard B Hayes; Margaret Tucker; Daniela S Gerhard; Joseph F Fraumeni; Robert N Hoover; Gilles Thomas; Stephen J Chanock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-05-27       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Increasing power in association studies by using linkage disequilibrium structure and molecular function as prior information.

Authors:  Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  A Markov random field model for network-based analysis of genomic data.

Authors:  Zhi Wei; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Chromosome 6p22 locus associated with clinically aggressive neuroblastoma.

Authors:  John M Maris; Yael P Mosse; Jonathan P Bradfield; Cuiping Hou; Stefano Monni; Richard H Scott; Shahab Asgharzadeh; Edward F Attiyeh; Sharon J Diskin; Marci Laudenslager; Cynthia Winter; Kristina A Cole; Joseph T Glessner; Cecilia Kim; Edward C Frackelton; Tracy Casalunovo; Andrew W Eckert; Mario Capasso; Eric F Rappaport; Carmel McConville; Wendy B London; Robert C Seeger; Nazneen Rahman; Marcella Devoto; Struan F A Grant; Hongzhe Li; Hakon Hakonarson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  16 in total

1.  Localizing putative markers in genetic association studies by incorporating linkage disequilibrium into bayesian hierarchical models.

Authors:  Brooke L Fridley; Gregory D Jenkins
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  A hidden Markov random field-based Bayesian method for the detection of long-range chromosomal interactions in Hi-C data.

Authors:  Zheng Xu; Guosheng Zhang; Fulai Jin; Mengjie Chen; Terrence S Furey; Patrick F Sullivan; Zhaohui Qin; Ming Hu; Yun Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  A Markov random field-based approach for joint estimation of differentially expressed genes in mouse transcriptome data.

Authors:  Zhixiang Lin; Mingfeng Li; Nenad Sestan; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2016-04

4.  Covariate-modulated local false discovery rate for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Rong W Zablocki; Andrew J Schork; Richard A Levine; Ole A Andreassen; Anders M Dale; Wesley K Thompson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  A Bayesian Approach for Graph-constrained Estimation for High-dimensional Regression.

Authors:  Hokeun Sun; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Int J Syst Synth Biol       Date:  2010

6.  A MARKOV RANDOM FIELD-BASED APPROACH TO CHARACTERIZING HUMAN BRAIN DEVELOPMENT USING SPATIAL-TEMPORAL TRANSCRIPTOME DATA.

Authors:  Zhixiang Lin; Stephan J Sanders; Mingfeng Li; Nenad Sestan; Matthew W State; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  NETWORK ASSISTED ANALYSIS TO REVEAL THE GENETIC BASIS OF AUTISM.

Authors:  Li Liu; Jing Lei; Kathryn Roeder
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  A Bayesian approach to identify genes and gene-level SNP aggregates in a genetic analysis of cancer data.

Authors:  Francesco C Stingo; Michael D Swartz; Marina Vannucci
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.582

9.  Bayesian Hidden Markov Models for Dependent Large-Scale Multiple Testing.

Authors:  Xia Wang; Ali Shojaie; Jian Zou
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 1.681

10.  Incorporating biological pathways via a Markov random field model in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Min Chen; Judy Cho; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.