Ramesh Srinivasan1, Tracey Irvine, Mark Dalzell. 1. Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Eaton Road, Liverpool, UK. ramsriniv@doctors.org.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: : To describe the indications and practice of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) device insertion for nutritional support and to ascertain procedure-related complications and outcome. METHODS: : Observational study with prospectively collected data on children who underwent PEG-related procedures (PEG insertion, removal, or change to low profile button devices [LPBD]) for a 5-year period (2002-2006) at our centre. RESULTS: : Six hundred one PEG-related procedures were performed during the study period (384 insertions, 165 conversions to LPBD, 49 permanent PEG removals, and 3 PEG reinsertions). The main indications for PEG insertion were feeding difficulties associated with neurodisability (160/384; 41.6%) and congenital heart disease (CHD 115/384; 30%). Children with CHD required feeding nutritional support at an earlier age than children with neurodisability regardless of underlying cardiac condition. The age of PEG insertion was significantly different between the 2 main groups (neurodisability 3.56 years vs CHD 0.39 years; P < 0.001 [t test]). Fifty-nine patients were discharged on the same day as PEG insertion without complications (day case gastrostomy). The median time between PEG insertion to LPBD conversion was 0.83 year (0.12-3.86). Twenty-four of the 49 children having permanent PEG removal had CHD. CONCLUSIONS: : Neurodisabilty and CHD were the main indications for PEG insertion, those with CHD requiring feeding support at an earlier age. Although CHD was an indication for PEG insertion in 30% of instances, a greater percentage of PEG removals (50%) were seen in this group indicating resolution of feeding difficulties.
OBJECTIVE: : To describe the indications and practice of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) device insertion for nutritional support and to ascertain procedure-related complications and outcome. METHODS: : Observational study with prospectively collected data on children who underwent PEG-related procedures (PEG insertion, removal, or change to low profile button devices [LPBD]) for a 5-year period (2002-2006) at our centre. RESULTS: : Six hundred one PEG-related procedures were performed during the study period (384 insertions, 165 conversions to LPBD, 49 permanent PEG removals, and 3 PEG reinsertions). The main indications for PEG insertion were feeding difficulties associated with neurodisability (160/384; 41.6%) and congenital heart disease (CHD 115/384; 30%). Children with CHD required feeding nutritional support at an earlier age than children with neurodisability regardless of underlying cardiac condition. The age of PEG insertion was significantly different between the 2 main groups (neurodisability 3.56 years vs CHD 0.39 years; P < 0.001 [t test]). Fifty-nine patients were discharged on the same day as PEG insertion without complications (day case gastrostomy). The median time between PEG insertion to LPBD conversion was 0.83 year (0.12-3.86). Twenty-four of the 49 children having permanent PEG removal had CHD. CONCLUSIONS: : Neurodisabilty and CHD were the main indications for PEG insertion, those with CHD requiring feeding support at an earlier age. Although CHD was an indication for PEG insertion in 30% of instances, a greater percentage of PEG removals (50%) were seen in this group indicating resolution of feeding difficulties.
Authors: Josephine Franken; Femke A Mauritz; Nutnicha Suksamanapun; Caroline C C Hulsker; David C van der Zee; Maud Y A van Herwaarden-Lindeboom Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Maireade E McSweeney; Jessica Kerr; Janine Amirault; Eliza Fishman; Margot Lurie; Maria I Peinado-Fabregat; Paul D Mitchell; Rachel Rosen Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Josephine Franken; Femke A Mauritz; Rebecca K Stellato; David C Van der Zee; Maud Y A Van Herwaarden-Lindeboom Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Nutnicha Suksamanapun; Femke A Mauritz; Josephine Franken; David C van der Zee; Maud Ya van Herwaarden-Lindeboom Journal: J Minim Access Surg Date: 2017 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.407