Literature DB >> 19820413

Indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and procedure-related outcome.

Ramesh Srinivasan1, Tracey Irvine, Mark Dalzell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: : To describe the indications and practice of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) device insertion for nutritional support and to ascertain procedure-related complications and outcome.
METHODS: : Observational study with prospectively collected data on children who underwent PEG-related procedures (PEG insertion, removal, or change to low profile button devices [LPBD]) for a 5-year period (2002-2006) at our centre.
RESULTS: : Six hundred one PEG-related procedures were performed during the study period (384 insertions, 165 conversions to LPBD, 49 permanent PEG removals, and 3 PEG reinsertions). The main indications for PEG insertion were feeding difficulties associated with neurodisability (160/384; 41.6%) and congenital heart disease (CHD 115/384; 30%). Children with CHD required feeding nutritional support at an earlier age than children with neurodisability regardless of underlying cardiac condition. The age of PEG insertion was significantly different between the 2 main groups (neurodisability 3.56 years vs CHD 0.39 years; P < 0.001 [t test]). Fifty-nine patients were discharged on the same day as PEG insertion without complications (day case gastrostomy). The median time between PEG insertion to LPBD conversion was 0.83 year (0.12-3.86). Twenty-four of the 49 children having permanent PEG removal had CHD.
CONCLUSIONS: : Neurodisabilty and CHD were the main indications for PEG insertion, those with CHD requiring feeding support at an earlier age. Although CHD was an indication for PEG insertion in 30% of instances, a greater percentage of PEG removals (50%) were seen in this group indicating resolution of feeding difficulties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19820413     DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31819a4e8c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  12 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children.

Authors:  Jye Hae Park; Seonkyeong Rhie; Su Jin Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2011-01-31

2.  Efficacy and adverse events of laparoscopic gastrostomy placement in children: results of a large cohort study.

Authors:  Josephine Franken; Femke A Mauritz; Nutnicha Suksamanapun; Caroline C C Hulsker; David C van der Zee; Maud Y A van Herwaarden-Lindeboom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Preoperative Evaluation Is Not Predictive of Transpyloric Feeding Conversion in Gastrostomy-dependent Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Maireade E McSweeney; Jessica Kerr; Janine Amirault; Eliza Fishman; Margot Lurie; Maria I Peinado-Fabregat; Paul D Mitchell; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.839

4.  Effect of Trisomy 21 on Postoperative Length of Stay and Non-cardiac Surgery After Complete Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Eric T Purifoy; Beverly J Spray; Joe S Riley; Parthak Prodhan; Elijah H Bolin
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: a single center experience.

Authors:  Tuğba Koca; Ayşe Çiğdem Sivrice; Selim Dereci; Levent Duman; Mustafa Akçam
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2015-12-01

6.  The Effect of Gastrostomy Placement on Gastric Function in Children: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Josephine Franken; Femke A Mauritz; Rebecca K Stellato; David C Van der Zee; Maud Y A Van Herwaarden-Lindeboom
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Guidelines on pediatric day surgery of the Italian Societies of Pediatric Surgery (SICP) and Pediatric Anesthesiology (SARNePI).

Authors:  Ugo de Luca; Giovanni Mangia; Simonetta Tesoro; Ascanio Martino; Maria Sammartino; Alessandro Calisti
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.638

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children less than 10 kilograms: A comparative study.

Authors:  Osama A Bawazir
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

9.  The protocol for a randomised-controlled trial of the evaluation of the tolerance and safety of early enteral nutrition in children after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. (protocol version 09.01.2015).

Authors:  Anna Wiernicka; Małgorzata Matuszczyk; Agnieszka Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz; Ewa Toporowska-Kowalska; Katarzyna Popińska; Urszula Chlebowczyk-Grzybowska; Ewa Hapyn; Jarosław Kierkuś
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Laparoscopic versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in children: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nutnicha Suksamanapun; Femke A Mauritz; Josephine Franken; David C van der Zee; Maud Ya van Herwaarden-Lindeboom
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.