Literature DB >> 19820043

Estimation of breed and heterosis effects for growth and carcass traits in cattle using published crossbreeding studies.

J L Williams1, I Aguilar, R Rekaya, J K Bertrand.   

Abstract

Current genetic evaluations are performed separately for each breed. Multiple breed genetic evaluations, however, assume a common base among breeds, enabling producers to compare cattle of different breed makeup. Breed and heterosis effects are needed in a multibreed evaluation because databases maintained by breed associations include few crossbred animals, which may not be enough to accurately estimate these effects. The objective of this study was to infer breed effects, maternal effects, direct heterosis effects, and maternal heterosis effects for growth and carcass traits using least squares means estimates from crossbreeding studies published in the literature from 1976 to 1996. The data set was formed by recording each least squares mean along with the breed composition, maternal breed composition, and direct and maternal heterozygosity. Each trait was analyzed using a single trait fixed effect model, which included study as a fixed effect and breed composition and heterozygosity as covariates. Breed solutions for each trait were expressed relative to the Angus breed. Direct breed effects for weaning weight ranged from -7.0 +/- 0.67 kg (British Dairy) to 29.3 +/- 0.74 kg (Simmental), and maternal effects ranged from -11.7 +/- 0.24 kg (Hereford) to 31.1 +/- 2.22 kg (Gelbvieh). Direct breed effects for birth weight ranged from -0.5 +/- 0.14 kg (British Dairy) to 10.1 +/- 0.46 kg (Continental Beef), and maternal effects ranged from -7.2 +/- 0.13 kg (Brahman) to 6.0 +/- 1.07 kg (Continental Beef). Direct breed effects ranged from -17.9 +/- 1.64 kg (Brahman) to 21.6 +/- 1.95 kg (Charolais), from -6.5 +/- 1.29 kg (Brahman) to 55.8 +/- 1.47 kg (Continental Beef), from -8.1 +/- 0.48 cm(2) (Shorthorn) to 21.0 +/- 0.48 cm(2) (Continental Beef), and from -1.1 +/- 0.02 cm (Continental Beef) to 0 +/- 0.00 cm (Angus) for postweaning BW gain, carcass weight, LM area, and fat thickness, respectively. The use of literature estimates to predict direct and maternal breed and heterosis effects may supplement their direct prediction in a multibreed evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19820043     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Modeling heterotic effects in beef cattle using genome-wide SNP-marker genotypes.

Authors:  Everestus C Akanno; Mohammed K Abo-Ismail; Liuhong Chen; John J Crowley; Zhiquan Wang; Changxi Li; John A Basarab; Michael D MacNeil; Graham S Plastow
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Characterization of water intake and water efficiency in beef cattle1,2.

Authors:  Cashley M Ahlberg; Kristi Allwardt; Ashley Broocks; Kelsey Bruno; Alexandra Taylor; Levi Mcphillips; Clint R Krehbiel; Michelle Calvo-Lorenzo; Chris J Richards; Sara E Place; Udaya Desilva; Deborah L Vanoverbeke; Raluca G Mateescu; Larry A Kuehn; Robert Weaber; Jennifer Bormann; Megan M Rolf
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Fatty acid profile, mineral content, and palatability of beef from a multibreed Angus-Brahman population.

Authors:  Sarah Flowers; Heather Hamblen; Joel D Leal-Gutiérrez; Mauricio A Elzo; Dwain D Johnson; Raluca G Mateescu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Direct and maternal breed additive and heterosis effects on growth traits of beef cattle raised in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Willian S Leal; Michael D MacNeil; Henry Gomes Carvalho; Ricardo Zambarda Vaz; Fernando F Cardoso
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Beef Production Systems with Steers of Dairy and Dairy × Beef Breeds Based on Forage and Semi-Natural Pastures.

Authors:  Anna Hessle; Margrethe Therkildsen; Katarina Arvidsson-Segerkvist
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  The Association Between Genomic Heterozygosity and Carcass Merit in Cattle.

Authors:  David Kenny; Tara R Carthy; Craig P Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Morphological characteristics of mule conceptuses during early development.

Authors:  Nathia Nathaly Rigoglio; Gustavo de Sá Schiavo Matias; Maria Angelica Miglino; Andrea Maria Mess; Julio Cesar Ferraz Jacob; Lawrence Charles Smith
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.807

8.  Quantitative genomics of 30 complex phenotypes in Wagyu x Angus F₁ progeny.

Authors:  Lifan Zhang; Jennifer J Michal; James V O'Fallon; Zengxiang Pan; Charles T Gaskins; Jerry J Reeves; Jan R Busboom; Xiang Zhou; Bo Ding; Michael V Dodson; Zhihua Jiang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 6.580

9.  Genome-wide association scan for heterotic quantitative trait loci in multi-breed and crossbred beef cattle.

Authors:  Everestus C Akanno; Liuhong Chen; Mohammed K Abo-Ismail; John J Crowley; Zhiquan Wang; Changxi Li; John A Basarab; Michael D MacNeil; Graham S Plastow
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Environment-Dependent Heterosis and Transgressive Gene Expression in Reciprocal Hybrids between the Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus and the Blue Catfish Ictalurus furcatus.

Authors:  Haolong Wang; Timothy J Bruce; Baofeng Su; Shangjia Li; Rex A Dunham; Xu Wang
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.