Literature DB >> 19816664

Cancer stem cells-clinical relevance.

Richard J Jones1.   

Abstract

Therapeutic advances over the past three decades now allow most cancer patients to achieve major clinical responses. Although clinical responses can clearly decrease side effects and improve quality of life, most cancer patients still eventually relapse and die of their disease. Many cancers have now been shown to harbor cells that are phenotypically and biologically similar to normal cells with self-renewal capacity; these so-called cancer stem cells (CSC) typically constitute only a small fraction of the total tumor burden, but theoretically harbor all the self-renewal capacity. Moreover, the CSC appears to be relatively resistant to standard anticancer therapies by co-opting normal stem cells' intrinsic defense mechanisms, such as quiescence, efflux pumps, and detoxifying enzymes. However, the clinical importance of CSC, if any, remains unproven. Nevertheless, emerging evidence suggests that initial responses in cancer represent therapeutic effectiveness against the bulk cancer cells, while the rare CSC is responsible for relapse. Better understanding of the biology of CSC, as well as reexamining both our preclinical and clinical drug development paradigms to include the CSC concept, has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of many cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19816664      PMCID: PMC3065719          DOI: 10.1007/s00109-009-0534-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)        ISSN: 0946-2716            Impact factor:   4.599


  36 in total

Review 1.  Dyskeratosis congenita: its link to telomerase and aplastic anaemia.

Authors:  Inderjeet Dokal; Tom Vulliamy
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 2.  Cancer stem cells: are we missing the target?

Authors:  Richard J Jones; William H Matsui; B Douglas Smith
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  CD20-directed serotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma: biologic considerations and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Steven P Treon; Linda M Pilarski; Andrew R Belch; Abigail Kelliher; Frederic I Preffer; Yoshihito Shima; Constantine S Mitsiades; Nicholas S Mitsiades; Agnieszka J Szczepek; Leonard Ellman; David Harmon; Michael L Grossbard; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.456

4.  Telomere dysfunction and evolution of intestinal carcinoma in mice and humans.

Authors:  K L Rudolph; M Millard; M W Bosenberg; R A DePinho
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J Anthony Child; Gareth J Morgan; Faith E Davies; Roger G Owen; Susan E Bell; Kim Hawkins; Julia Brown; Mark T Drayson; Peter J Selby
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Magnitude of response with myeloma frontline therapy does not predict outcome: importance of time to progression in southwest oncology group chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Brian G M Durie; Joth Jacobson; Bart Barlogie; John Crowley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Characterization of clonogenic multiple myeloma cells.

Authors:  William Matsui; Carol Ann Huff; Qiuju Wang; Matthew T Malehorn; James Barber; Yvette Tanhehco; B Douglas Smith; Curt I Civin; Richard J Jones
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Intrinsic resistance of tumorigenic breast cancer cells to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xiaoxian Li; Michael T Lewis; Jian Huang; Carolina Gutierrez; C Kent Osborne; Meng-Fen Wu; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Anne Pavlick; Xiaomei Zhang; Gary C Chamness; Helen Wong; Jeffrey Rosen; Jenny C Chang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate.

Authors:  Caio M Rocha Lima; Mark R Green; Robert Rotche; Wilson H Miller; G Mark Jeffrey; Laura A Cisar; Adele Morganti; Nicoletta Orlando; Gabriela Gruia; Langdon L Miller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Chemotherapy of prostate cancer: present and future.

Authors:  Donald Trump; Yiu-Keung Lau
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.862

View more
  4 in total

1.  Controversies in cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Richard J Jones
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Inhibition of sonic hedgehog pathway and pluripotency maintaining factors regulate human pancreatic cancer stem cell characteristics.

Authors:  Su-Ni Tang; Junsheng Fu; Dara Nall; Mariana Rodova; Sharmila Shankar; Rakesh K Srivastava
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Sulforaphane synergizes with quercetin to inhibit self-renewal capacity of pancreatic cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Rakesh K Srivastava; Su-Ni Tang; Wenyu Zhu; Daniel Meeker; Sharmila Shankar
Journal:  Front Biosci (Elite Ed)       Date:  2011-01-01

4.  Induction of multiple myeloma cancer stem cell apoptosis using conjugated anti-ABCG2 antibody with epirubicin-loaded microbubbles.

Authors:  Fangfang Shi; Miao Li; Jing Wang; Di Wu; Meng Pan; Mei Guo; Jun Dou
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 6.832

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.