Literature DB >> 15111617

Magnitude of response with myeloma frontline therapy does not predict outcome: importance of time to progression in southwest oncology group chemotherapy trials.

Brian G M Durie1, Joth Jacobson, Bart Barlogie, John Crowley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Four Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) standard-dose chemotherapy protocols for multiple myeloma (MM) initiated between 1982 and 1992 were evaluated. The purpose was to clarify the predictive value of specific levels of myeloma-associated monoclonal protein reduction and time to first progression using mature data sets. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study data on 1,555 eligible previously untreated patients with MM enrolled onto SWOG phase III trials 8229, 8624, 9028, and 9210 were used in these analyses. Six-month and 12-month landmark analyses were performed to evaluate the outcome for patients in each response category.
RESULTS: The overall and event-free survivals for the four protocols combined were 33 months and 18 months, respectively. Using 6- and 12-month landmarks, the median survivals of 30 to 35 months were not different for responders (> or = 50% and > or = 75% regression) versus nonresponders in patients without disease progression before the landmarks. Conversely, at the 6- and 12-month landmarks, the median survivals for patients who had experienced disease progression were 13 and 15 months, respectively, versus a 34-month median for patients who did not experience progression. Using the Cox survival model, with response and progression considered as time-dependent covariates, survival duration was influenced more by the occurrence of progression than by the occurrence of response.
CONCLUSION: The magnitude of response, as a single variable, does not predict survival duration. Patients with response and stable disease have equivalent outcome. Only patients with progressive disease have a poorer outcome. The best indicator of survival is time to first progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15111617     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  26 in total

1.  An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells.

Authors:  Ariosto Silva; Timothy Jacobson; Mark Meads; Allison Distler; Kenneth Shain
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  The paradox of response and survival in cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Carol Ann Huff; William Matsui; B Douglas Smith; Richard J Jones
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Recent reminders of why the gold standard for clinical research in oncology is the well-designed and conducted randomized phase III trial.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Efficacy and safety results with the combination therapy of arsenic trioxide, dexamethasone, and ascorbic acid in multiple myeloma patients: a phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Rony M Abou-Jawde; Janice Reed; Megan Kelly; Esteban Walker; Steven Andresen; Rachid Baz; Mary Ann Karam; Mohamad Hussein
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Cancer stem cells: relevance to clinical transplantation.

Authors:  Gabriel Ghiaur; Jonathan M Gerber; William Matsui; Richard J Jones
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.645

6.  Reduction in plasma cell proliferation after initial therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma measures treatment response and predicts improved survival.

Authors:  Jeremy T Larsen; Cheng E Chee; John A Lust; Philip R Greipp; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Appraisal of immunoglobulin free light chain as a marker of response.

Authors:  Angela Dispenzieri; Lijun Zhang; Jerry A Katzmann; Melissa Snyder; Emily Blood; Roberta Degoey; Kimberly Henderson; Robert A Kyle; Martin M Oken; Arthur R Bradwell; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Eliminating Cancer Stem Cells by Targeting Embryonic Signaling Pathways.

Authors:  Ohad Oren; B Douglas Smith
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 9.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Cancer Stem Cells: From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Richard J Jones; William Matsui
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.