Literature DB >> 19815804

Revelation effect in metamemory.

Kymberly D Young1, Zehra F Peynircioğlu, Timothy J Hohman.   

Abstract

Test items are more likely to be judged as previously studied if they need to be discovered before the recognition decision. In the present experiments, this revelation effect was extended to metamemory judgments. Participants studied word pairs and then tried to recall the second word of each pair when given the first word as a cue. In Experiment 1, a fragment of the target was either gradually increased in size or held constant, and in Experiment 2, sometimes an anagram of the cue was given instead of the cue itself. Thus, for some items, there was a revelation task before a recall attempt. If recall failed, the participants gave feeling-of-knowing (FOK) ratings. In both experiments, the participants gave higher FOK ratings after a revelation task, even though the items that these FOKs referred to remained unrecalled. Analyses showed a criterion shift but no differences in sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815804     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; L D Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Extending the revelation effect to faces: haven't we met before?

Authors:  Brian H Bornstein; Jeffrey R Wilson
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2004-03

3.  ROC curves show that the revelation effect is not a single phenomenon.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

4.  A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.

Authors:  J L Hicks; R L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The revelation effect: when disguising test items induces recognition.

Authors:  M J Watkins; Z F Peynircioglu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  On the generality of the revelation effect.

Authors:  D L Westerman; R L Greene
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation.

Authors:  D L Westerman; R L Greene
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions.

Authors:  V Gourevitch; E Galanter
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.

Authors:  A Koriat
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Conditions affecting the revelation effect for autobiographical memory.

Authors:  Daniel M Bernstein; Ryan D Godfrey; Arienne Davison; Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The revelation effect: A meta-analytic test of hypotheses.

Authors:  André Aßfalg; Daniel M Bernstein; William Hockley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.