Literature DB >> 19812583

Hospital neonatal services in the United States: variation in definitions, criteria, and regulatory status, 2008.

L R Blackmon1, W D Barfield, A R Stark.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe variation among states in designations of hospital neonatal services levels. STUDY
DESIGN: We systematically searched all 50 states and District of Columbia governmental web sites and extracted definitions and levels terminology, functional and utilization criteria, regulatory compliance and funding measures, and citation of American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) documents on levels of neonatal care. RESULT: Thirty-three states designate multiple graduated levels of neonatal services. Two to six levels were designated by numbers, titles, or both. Regulatory sources include hospital licensure, Certificate of Need or State Health Plan (CON/SHP), State Health Department, or an affiliated non-governmental entity (SHD/affiliate). Twenty-four states have a single source and nine have two or more. Functional criteria include population characteristics, respiratory care capabilities, and neonatal and cardiac surgery in 25 states. Utilization criteria include capacity, volume, occupancy, or case mix. Compliance mechanisms include license renewal, CON/SHP approval, and/or SHD/affiliate certification. Thirteen states link funding for the highest level of care through Medicaid, Maternal Child Health Title V funds or regional programs. AAP documents are cited or incorporated by reference in 22 states.
CONCLUSION: All states regulate health care services and facilities. Definitions, criteria, compliance mechanisms, and regulatory source and status of neonatal levels of service vary widely. A consistent national approach would facilitate comparisons in neonatal outcomes and resource use and be informative to parents, providers, and policy makers. AAP documents could serve as a mechanism to foster such consistency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19812583     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2009.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  14 in total

1.  Neonatal and pediatric regionalized systems in pediatric emergency mass critical care.

Authors:  Wanda D Barfield; Steven E Krug; Robert K Kanter; Marianne Gausche-Hill; Mary D Brantley; Sarita Chung; Niranjan Kissoon
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.624

2.  Evaluating the effect of hospital and insurance type on the risk of 1-year mortality of very low birth weight infants: controlling for selection bias.

Authors:  Songthip Ounpraseuth; C Heath Gauss; Janet Bronstein; Curtis Lowery; Richard Nugent; Richard Hall
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Regionalization and local hospital closure in Norwegian maternity care--the effect on neonatal and infant mortality.

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Lars Monkerud; Irene Skau; Rune Sørensen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Comparison of state risk-appropriate neonatal care policies with the 2012 AAP policy statement.

Authors:  Charlan D Kroelinger; Ekwutosi M Okoroh; David A Goodman; Sarah M Lasswell; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Why so little progress in regionalization of perinatal care when transport of high-risk neonates remains a substantial risk?

Authors:  Matthew J Bizzarro; Patrick G Gallagher
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Improving perinatal regionalization for preterm deliveries in a Medicaid covered population: initial impact of the Arkansas ANGELS intervention.

Authors:  Janet M Bronstein; Songthip Ounpraseuth; Jeffrey Jonkman; Curtis L Lowery; David Fletcher; Richard R Nugent; Richard W Hall
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  United States and territory policies supporting maternal and neonatal transfer: review of transport and reimbursement.

Authors:  E M Okoroh; C D Kroelinger; S M Lasswell; D A Goodman; A M Williams; W D Barfield
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Implementing CDC's Level of Care Assessment Tool (LOCATe): A National Collaboration to Improve Maternal and Child Health.

Authors:  Andrea Catalano; Amanda Bennett; Ashley Busacker; Alethia Carr; David Goodman; Charlan Kroelinger; Ekwutosi Okoroh; Mary Brantley; Wanda Barfield
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Telemedicine collaboration improves perinatal regionalization and lowers statewide infant mortality.

Authors:  E W Kim; T J Teague-Ross; W W Greenfield; D Keith Williams; D Kuo; R W Hall
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  The impact of maternal characteristics on the moderately premature infant: an antenatal maternal transport clinical prediction rule.

Authors:  D Dukhovny; S Dukhovny; D M Pursley; G J Escobar; M C McCormick; W Y Mao; J A F Zupancic
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.