Literature DB >> 19811115

Online eAssessment: AMEE guide no. 39.

Reg Dennick1, Simon Wilkinson, Nigel Purcell.   

Abstract

In this guide, the authors outline the advantages of online eAssessment and examine the intellectual, technical, legal and cost issues that arise from its use. This guide outlines the major assessment types that are suitable for online assessment and makes a key distinction between formative and summative assessment. The focus is primarily on the latter since that is where the difficulties are most acute and robust systems most critical. A range of practical issues relating to the key stages in running a summative e-exam are explored and advice given on system requirements and on how to ensure that the exam runs smoothly when you 'go live'. This section includes consideration of the way that using eAssessment might affect the standard setting and results analysis process. The section on future trends in online assessment explores possibilities such as computer adaptive testing and the automated assessment of free text answers. Finally, there is a consideration of the implications of these trends for management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19811115     DOI: 10.1080/01421590902792406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  11 in total

1.  Online assessment in medical education-current trends and future directions.

Authors:  K Walsh
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.875

2.  Emerging from emergency pandemic pedagogy: A survey of anatomical educators in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Authors:  Kate Dulohery; Deirdre Scully; Georga J Longhurst; Danya M Stone; Thomas Campbell
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.409

3.  Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat (SWOT) Analysis of the Adaptations to Anatomical Education in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Georga J Longhurst; Danya M Stone; Kate Dulohery; Deirdre Scully; Thomas Campbell; Claire F Smith
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Blended programmatic assessment for competency based curricula.

Authors:  R Mahajan; S Saiyad; A Virk; A Joshi; T Singh
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.476

5.  Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Karen Mate; Judith Weidenhofer
Journal:  FASEB Bioadv       Date:  2021-10-25

6.  Computer Based Assessment (CBA): Perception of residents at Dow University of Health Sciences.

Authors:  Masood Jawaid; Foad Ali Moosa; Farhat Jaleel; Junaid Ashraf
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Key Points to Facilitate the Adoption of Computer-Based Assessments.

Authors:  S A Burr; A Chatterjee; S Gibson; L Coombes; S Wilkinson
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2016-06-15

8.  Medical assessment in the age of digitalisation.

Authors:  Saskia Egarter; Anna Mutschler; Ara Tekian; John Norcini; Konstantin Brass
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 9.  Communication, collaboration and contagion: "Virtualisation" of anatomy during COVID-19.

Authors:  Kevin G Byrnes; Patrick A Kiely; Colum P Dunne; Kieran W McDermott; John Calvin Coffey
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.409

10.  Web-based and paper-based examinations: Lessons learnt during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.

Authors:  Mohamed Nor-El-Din Saleh; Tarek Abdul Ra'oof Salem; Ahmad Saleh Alamro; Majed Mohammed Wadi
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.