Literature DB >> 32170420

Usefulness of computed tomography in predicting ethmoidal arterial bleeding in refractory epistaxis.

Yung Jin Jeon1,2, Dae Hwan Kim1, Young Chul Kim1, Byeong Min Lee1, Yeon-Hee Joo3, Hyun-Jin Cho4,5, Sang-Wook Kim6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Epistaxis that is refractory to conservative management can be treated with endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation (ESPAL). Although rare, ethmoidal artery (EA) bleeding can be a cause of rebleeding after successful ESPAL. EA bleeding is diagnosed by angiography and can also be identified during surgical exploration. However, since the angiographic embolization of the EA is contraindicated, surgical hemostasis is mandatory. This study investigated whether paranasal sinus (PNS) CT could provide information for predicting EA bleeding without angiography in patients with refractory epistaxis requiring ESPAL.
METHODS: Forty-seven patients, who were surgically treated [with ESPAL or EA ligation (EAL)] for refractory epistaxis from March 2010 to June 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. A positive PNS CT finding for EA bleeding was defined as the presence of soft tissue densities having continuity with the EA pathway, accompanied by a partially deficient surrounding bony canal. These findings as well as soft tissue densities in each paranasal sinus were compared between the ESPAL and EAL groups.
RESULTS: All patients in the EAL group had positive CT findings of EA bleeding, compared to only 12.2% in the ESPAL group (P < 0.001). The rate of soft tissue densities within the frontal and sphenoid sinuses were noted in 26.8% and 17.1% of patients in the ESPAL group, compared to 83.3% and 83.3% of patients in the EAL group (P = 0.013 and P = 0.003, respectively).
CONCLUSION: PNS CT might be useful for predicting EA bleeding in patients with refractory epistaxis requiring surgical hemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior ethmoidal artery; Computed tomography; Epistaxis; Posterior ethmoidal artery; Surgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32170420     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-05914-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  23 in total

1.  Endoscopic endonasal ligation of the sphenopalatine artery.

Authors:  B Ram; P S White; H A Saleh; T Odutoye; A Cain
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Severe posterior epistaxis-endoscopic surgical anatomy.

Authors:  Francini G M Pádua; Richard L Voegels
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Guidelines for the management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: how we do it.

Authors:  A Daudia; V Jaiswal; N S Jones
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  Cost of management in epistaxis admission: Impact of patient and hospital characteristics.

Authors:  Erden Goljo; Rajan Dang; Alfred M Iloreta; Satish Govindaraj
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolization for intractable epistaxis.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Randy Leung
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Epistaxis: medical versus surgical therapy: a comparison of efficacy, complications, and economic considerations.

Authors:  B Schaitkin; M Strauss; J R Houck
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Treatment disparities in the management of epistaxis in United States emergency departments.

Authors:  Rosh K V Sethi; Elliott D Kozin; Nicholas B Abt; Regan Bergmark; Stacey T Gray
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  On the effectiveness of treatment options in epistaxis: an analysis of 678 interventions.

Authors:  M B Soyka; G Nikolaou; K Rufibach; D Holzmann
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation for Epistaxis: Factors Influencing Outcome and Impact of Timing of Surgery.

Authors:  Ailbhe M McDermott; Eadaoin O'Cathain; Brian William Carey; Peter O'Sullivan; Patrick Sheahan
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation versus nasal packing as first-line treatment for posterior epistaxis.

Authors:  Raj C Dedhia; Shamit S Desai; Kenneth J Smith; Stella Lee; Barry M Schaitkin; Carl H Snyderman; Eric W Wang
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.