Literature DB >> 19810407

Density functional theory including dispersion corrections for intermolecular interactions in a large benchmark set of biologically relevant molecules.

Jens Antony1, Stefan Grimme.   

Abstract

Density functional theory including dispersion corrections (DFT-D) is applied to calculate intermolecular interaction energies in an extensive benchmark set consisting mainly of DNA base pairs and amino acid pairs, for which CCSD(T) complete basis set limit estimates are available (JSCH-2005 database). The three generalized gradient approximation (GGA) density functionals B-LYP, PBE and the new B97-D are tested together with the popular hybrid functional B3-LYP. The DFT-D interaction energies deviate on average by less than 1 kcal mol(-1) or 10% from the reference values. In only six out of 161 cases, the deviation exceeds 2 kcal mol(-1). With one exception, the few larger deviations occur for non-equilibrium structures extracted from experimental geometries. The largest absolute deviations are observed for pairs of oppositely charged amino acids which are, however, not significant on a relative basis due to the huge interaction energies > 100 kcal mol(-1) involved. The counterpoise (CP) correction for the basis set superposition error with the applied triple-zeta AO basis sets varies between 0 and -1 kcal mol(-1) (<5% of the interaction energy in most cases) except for four complexes, where it is up to -1.4 kcal mol(-1). It is thus suggested to skip the laborious calculation of the CP correction in DFT-D treatments with reasonable basis sets. The three dispersion corrected GGAs considered differ mainly for the interactions of the hydrogen-bonded DNA base pairs, which are systematically too small by 0.6 kcal mol(-1) in case of B97-D, while for PBE-D they are too high by 1.5 kcal mol(-1), and for B-LYP-D by 0.5 kcal mol(-1). The all in all excellent results that have been obtained at affordable computational costs suggest the DFT-D method to be a routine tool for many applications in organic chemistry or biochemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 19810407     DOI: 10.1039/b612585a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  31 in total

1.  Benchmark fragment-based (1)H, (13)C, (15)N and (17)O chemical shift predictions in molecular crystals.

Authors:  Joshua D Hartman; Ryan A Kudla; Graeme M Day; Leonard J Mueller; Gregory J O Beran
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.676

2.  Modeling the noncovalent interactions at the metabolite binding site in purine riboswitches.

Authors:  Purshotam Sharma; Sitansh Sharma; Mohit Chawla; Abhijit Mitra
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Further analysis and comparative study of intermolecular interactions using dimers from the S22 database.

Authors:  Laszlo Fusti Molnar; Xiao He; Bing Wang; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Density functional theory studies of the extent of hole delocalization in one-electron oxidized adenine and guanine base stacks.

Authors:  Anil Kumar; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Comparison of some dispersion-corrected and traditional functionals with CCSD(T) and MP2 ab initio methods: dispersion, induction, and basis set superposition error.

Authors:  Dipankar Roy; Mateusz Marianski; Neepa T Maitra; J J Dannenberg
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Theoretical investigation on the selective detection of SO2 molecule by AlN nanosheets.

Authors:  Somayeh F Rastegar; Nasser L Hadipour; Hamed Soleymanabadi
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Stereoselectivity in Oxyallyl-Furan 4+3 Cycloadditions: Control of Intermediate Conformations and Dispersive Stabilisation with Evans' Oxazolidinones.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Krenske; K N Houk; Andrew G Lohse; Jennifer E Antoline; Richard P Hsung
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 9.825

8.  Silver(I) metallodrugs of thiosemicarbazones and naproxen: biocompatibility, in vitro anti-proliferative activity and in silico interaction studies with EGFR, VEGFR2 and LOX receptors.

Authors:  Sundaram Bharathi; Dharmasivam Mahendiran; Raju Senthil Kumar; Hyo Jeong Choi; Mani Gajendiran; Kyobum Kim; Aziz Kalilur Rahiman
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.524

9.  Quinoline alkaloids as intercalative topoisomerase inhibitors.

Authors:  Kendall G Byler; Chen Wang; William N Setzer
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Exquisite selectivity for human toll-like receptor 8 in substituted furo[2,3-c]quinolines.

Authors:  Hari Prasad Kokatla; Diptesh Sil; Subbalakshmi S Malladi; Rajalakshmi Balakrishna; Alec R Hermanson; Lauren M Fox; Xinkun Wang; Anshuman Dixit; Sunil A David
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.