A James Lee1, Donald S Shepard. 1. School of Health and Environment, University of Massachusetts-Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA. AJames_Lee@uml.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Inadequate payment to providers for traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and lifestyle modification programs may contribute to low utilization, but little systematic evidence exists. This article estimates and compares the per-patient costs and revenues for 3 types of secondary prevention programs: the Dr Dean Ornish Program for Reversing Heart Disease (Ornish), the Benson-Henry Mind/Body Medical Institute's Cardiac Wellness Program (M/BMI), and CR. METHODS: The authors developed an Excel spreadsheet template for the costs of a secondary prevention program and calibrated it to 7 programs that provided the necessary data. The calibration was based on budgets, cost accounting, statistical reports, and structured interviews (in person or by telephone). RESULTS: The 4 lifestyle programs (2 Ornish and 2 M/BMI) cost almost 4 times as much per patient as the 3 traditional CR programs (means of $7,176 and $1,828, respectively; difference P < .05). The Ornish program costs averaged more than twice those of M/BMI ($9,895 and $4,458, respectively; difference P < .10). Medicare-allowed charges (including co-payments) were $5,650 for Ornish, $4,800 for M/BMI, and about $32.50 per session or $683 overall for CR. CONCLUSIONS: Programs achieved the lowest costs per patient by carefully matching program capacity to demand. In none of the programs did net revenues cover costs. The findings suggest that 4 patients could attend a traditional CR program for the cost of 1 patient in an enhanced program.
PURPOSE: Inadequate payment to providers for traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and lifestyle modification programs may contribute to low utilization, but little systematic evidence exists. This article estimates and compares the per-patient costs and revenues for 3 types of secondary prevention programs: the Dr Dean Ornish Program for Reversing Heart Disease (Ornish), the Benson-Henry Mind/Body Medical Institute's Cardiac Wellness Program (M/BMI), and CR. METHODS: The authors developed an Excel spreadsheet template for the costs of a secondary prevention program and calibrated it to 7 programs that provided the necessary data. The calibration was based on budgets, cost accounting, statistical reports, and structured interviews (in person or by telephone). RESULTS: The 4 lifestyle programs (2 Ornish and 2 M/BMI) cost almost 4 times as much per patient as the 3 traditional CR programs (means of $7,176 and $1,828, respectively; difference P < .05). The Ornish program costs averaged more than twice those of M/BMI ($9,895 and $4,458, respectively; difference P < .10). Medicare-allowed charges (including co-payments) were $5,650 for Ornish, $4,800 for M/BMI, and about $32.50 per session or $683 overall for CR. CONCLUSIONS: Programs achieved the lowest costs per patient by carefully matching program capacity to demand. In none of the programs did net revenues cover costs. The findings suggest that 4 patients could attend a traditional CR program for the cost of 1 patient in an enhanced program.
Authors: Patrick D Savage; Bonnie K Sanderson; Todd M Brown; Kathy Berra; Philip A Ades Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2011 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Philip A Ades; Steven J Keteyian; Janet S Wright; Larry F Hamm; Karen Lui; Kimberly Newlin; Donald S Shepard; Randal J Thomas Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Siobhan M Phillips; Linda M Collins; Frank J Penedo; Kerry S Courneya; Whitney Welch; Alison Cottrell; Gillian R Lloyd; Kara Gavin; David Cella; Ronald T Ackermann; Juned Siddique; Bonnie Spring Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Dana R Fletcher; Gary K Grunwald; Catherine Battaglia; P Michael Ho; Richard C Lindrooth; Pamela N Peterson Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2021-03-08