Literature DB >> 33677975

Association Between Increased Hospital Reimbursement for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Utilization of Cardiac Rehabilitation by Medicare Beneficiaries: An Interrupted Time Series.

Dana R Fletcher1, Gary K Grunwald2, Catherine Battaglia1,3, P Michael Ho4,3, Richard C Lindrooth1, Pamela N Peterson4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a Class I Guideline recommendation, and has been shown to be a cost-effective intervention after a cardiac event, it has been reimbursed at levels insufficient to cover hospital operating costs. In January 2011, Medicare increased payment for CR in hospital outpatient settings by ≈180%. We evaluated the association between this payment increase and participation in CR of eligible Medicare beneficiaries to better understand the relationship between reimbursement policy and CR utilization.
METHODS: From a 5% Medicare claims sample, we identified patients with acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, or cardiac valve surgery between January 1, 2009 and September 30, 2012, alive 30 days after their event, with continuous enrollment in Medicare fee-for-service, Part A/B for 4 months. Trends and changes in CR participation were estimated using an interrupted time series approach with a hierarchical logistic model, hospital random intercepts, adjusted for patient, hospital, market, and seasonality factors. Estimates were expressed using average marginal effects on a percent scale.
RESULTS: Among 76 695 eligible patients, average annual CR participation was 19.5% overall. In the period before payment increase, adjusted annual participation grew by 1.1 percentage points (95% CI, 0.48-2.4). No immediate change occurred in CR participation when the new payment was implemented. In the period after payment increase, on average, 20% of patients participated in CR annually. The annual growth rate in CR participation slowed in the post-period by 1.3 percentage points (95% CI, -2.4 to -0.12) compared with the prior period. Results were somewhat sensitive to time window variations.
CONCLUSIONS: The 2011 increase in Medicare reimbursement for CR was not associated with an increase in participation. Future studies should evaluate whether payment did not reach a threshold to incentivize hospitals or if hospitals were not sensitive to reimbursement changes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac rehabilitation; hospital; myocardial infarction; outpatient; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33677975      PMCID: PMC8035974          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  20 in total

1.  Medicare Program; Advancing Care Coordination Through Episode Payment Models (EPMs); Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payment Model; and Changes to the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model (CJR). Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2017-01-03

Review 2.  Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From 20% to 70%: A Road Map From the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative.

Authors:  Philip A Ades; Steven J Keteyian; Janet S Wright; Larry F Hamm; Karen Lui; Kimberly Newlin; Donald S Shepard; Randal J Thomas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 3.  2018 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.

Authors:  Randal J Thomas; Gary Balady; Gaurav Banka; Theresa M Beckie; Jensen Chiu; Sana Gokak; P Michael Ho; Steven J Keteyian; Marjorie King; Karen Lui; Quinn Pack; Bonnie K Sanderson; Tracy Y Wang
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-04

4.  Optimizing Value From Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Age, Sex, and Clinical Subgroups.

Authors:  Laura E Leggett; Trina Hauer; Billie-Jean Martin; Braden Manns; Sandeep Aggarwal; Ross Arena; Leslie D Austford; Don Meldrum; William Ghali; Merril L Knudtson; Colleen M Norris; James A Stone; Fiona Clement
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Financial incentives to promote cardiac rehabilitation participation and adherence among Medicaid patients.

Authors:  Diann E Gaalema; Patrick D Savage; Jason L Rengo; Alexander Y Cutler; Stephen T Higgins; Philip A Ades
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Association Between Patient Cost Sharing and Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence.

Authors:  Michel Farah; Maya Abdallah; Heidi Szalai; Robert Berry; Tara Lagu; Peter K Lindenauer; Quinn R Pack
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Medicare's intensive behavioral therapy for obesity: an exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Hoerger; Wesley L Crouse; Xiaohui Zhuo; Edward W Gregg; Ann L Albright; Ping Zhang
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Lindsey Anderson; David R Thompson; Neil Oldridge; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Karen Rees; Nicole Martin; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-05

9.  Predictors of early and late enrollment in cardiac rehabilitation, among those referred, after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Susmita Parashar; John A Spertus; Fengming Tang; Kathy L Bishop; Viola Vaccarino; Charles F Jackson; Thomas F Boyden; Laurence Sperling
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  The Theory of Value-Based Payment Incentives and Their Application to Health Care.

Authors:  Douglas A Conrad
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.