Literature DB >> 19808456

Remote robotic navigation and electroanatomical mapping for ablation of atrial fibrillation: considerations for navigation and impact on procedural outcome.

Boris Schmidt1, Roland R Tilz, Kars Neven, K R Julian Chun, Alexander Fürnkranz, Feifan Ouyang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency current ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) requires high technical skills to achieve optimal catheter stability and is associated with an individually high x-ray exposure to both the patient and the operator. To facilitate catheter navigation and to reduce the operator's x-ray burden, remote navigation (RN) systems have been developed. Considerations for navigation of a novel remote robotic navigation system in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures are reported. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 65 patients with drug-refractory AF (43 paroxysmal, 22 persistent), complete circumferential PVI was performed using RN in conjunction with different electroanatomic mapping systems. Acute complete PVI using exclusively RN was achieved in 95%. The procedure time was 195+/-40 minutes. The operator's x-ray exposure time was reduced by 6+/-4 minutes (35%) using RN. In 7 of 14 patients with persistent AF, conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved by radiofrequency current ablation. During a median follow-up period of 239 days (range, 184 to 314 days), 47 of 65 patients (73%) remained free of any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences after a single procedure. The relative proportion of patients remaining free of AF was 76% and 68% for paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PVI using the novel RN system can be performed safely and effectively. One third of the operator's fluoroscopy exposure time might be saved using RN. However, the questions of whether the overall fluoroscopy exposure is reduced by RN and whether RN improves PVI procedures needs to be assessed during a comparative trial between man and machine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19808456     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.818211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  21 in total

Review 1.  State-of-the-art and emerging technologies for atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Jane Dewire; Hugh Calkins
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Remote robotic catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: how fast is it learned and what benefits can be earned?

Authors:  Andreas Rillig; Udo Meyerfeldt; Ralf Birkemeyer; Fabian Treusch; Markus Kunze; Tomislav Miljak; Vlada Zvereva; Werner Jung
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  First experience with a novel robotic remote catheter system: Amigo™ mapping trial.

Authors:  Ejaz M Khan; William Frumkin; G Andre Ng; Suresh Neelagaru; Freddy M Abi-Samra; Jay Lee; Michael Giudici; Douglas Gohn; Roger A Winkle; Jonathan Sussman; Bradley P Knight; Adam Berman; Hugh Calkins
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Accurate guidance of a catheter by ultrasound imaging and identification of a catheter tip by pulsed-wave Doppler.

Authors:  Eileen M McMahon; Panupong Jiamsripong; Minako Katayama; Hari P Chaliki; Mostafa Fatemi; Marek Belohlavek
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 6.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation - Worth the Effort?

Authors:  António M Ferreira; Pedro Carmo; Pedro Adragão
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-04-14

Review 7.  Role of Remote Navigation Systems in AF Ablation.

Authors:  Boris Schmidt; Britta Schulte-Hahn; Bernd Nowak; Verena Windhorst; Verena Windhorst; Kyoung Ryul Julian Chun
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2011-02-22

Review 8.  Differences In Tissue Injury and Ablation Outcomes In Atrial Fibrillation Patients - Manual versus Robotic Catheters.

Authors:  Georg Nölker; Dieter Horstkotte; Klaus Jürgen Gutleben
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-08-31

9.  Robotic catheter ablation of left ventricular tachycardia: initial experience.

Authors:  Miguel Valderrábano; Amish S Dave; José L Báez-Escudero; Tapan Rami
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Acoustically active injection catheter guided by ultrasound: navigation tests in acutely ischemic porcine hearts.

Authors:  Marek Belohlavek; Minako Katayama; David Zarbatany; F David Fortuin; Mostafa Fatemi; Ivan Z Nenadic; Eileen M McMahon
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.