BACKGROUND: Urotensin-II (U-II) is an endogenous peptide upregulated in failing hearts. To date, insights into the myocardial actions of U-II have been obscured by its potent vasoconstrictor effects and interspecies differences in physiological responses to U-II. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the direct effects of exogenous U-II on in vitro contractility in nonfailing and failing human myocardial trabeculae (n=47). Rapid cooling contractures (RCC) were used to examine sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) load. In nonfailing myocardium, exogenous U-II increased developed force (DF), rates of force generation and decline and RCC amplitude suggesting increased sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) load. In isolated myocyte suspensions from nonfailing hearts, U-II increased phospholamban phosphorylation. In failing myocardium, exogenous U-II reduced DF and rates of force generation and decline without a significant change in RCC amplitude in trabeculae or a change in phospholamban phosphorylation in myocytes. To examine the effects of endogenous U-II, we administered the peptidic U-II receptor antagonist (UT-A) GSK248451A to isolated trabeculae. UT-A induced a decrease in DF in nonfailing myocardium and an increase in DF in failing myocardium. UT-A increased RCC amplitude slightly in both nonfailing and failing myocardium. During ongoing UT-A, exogenous U-II had little effect on DF and RCC amplitude, confirming effective receptor blockade. CONCLUSIONS: U-II modulates contractility independent of vasoconstriction with opposite effects in failing and nonfailing hearts. Positive inotropic responses to UT-A alone suggests that increased endogenous U-II constrains contractility in failing hearts via an autocrine or paracrine mechanism. These findings support a potential therapeutic role for UT-A in heart failure.
BACKGROUND:Urotensin-II (U-II) is an endogenous peptide upregulated in failing hearts. To date, insights into the myocardial actions of U-II have been obscured by its potent vasoconstrictor effects and interspecies differences in physiological responses to U-II. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the direct effects of exogenous U-II on in vitro contractility in nonfailing and failing human myocardial trabeculae (n=47). Rapid cooling contractures (RCC) were used to examine sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) load. In nonfailing myocardium, exogenous U-II increased developed force (DF), rates of force generation and decline and RCC amplitude suggesting increased sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) load. In isolated myocyte suspensions from nonfailing hearts, U-II increased phospholamban phosphorylation. In failing myocardium, exogenous U-II reduced DF and rates of force generation and decline without a significant change in RCC amplitude in trabeculae or a change in phospholamban phosphorylation in myocytes. To examine the effects of endogenous U-II, we administered the peptidic U-II receptor antagonist (UT-A) GSK248451A to isolated trabeculae. UT-A induced a decrease in DF in nonfailing myocardium and an increase in DF in failing myocardium. UT-A increased RCC amplitude slightly in both nonfailing and failing myocardium. During ongoing UT-A, exogenous U-II had little effect on DF and RCC amplitude, confirming effective receptor blockade. CONCLUSIONS:U-II modulates contractility independent of vasoconstriction with opposite effects in failing and nonfailing hearts. Positive inotropic responses to UT-A alone suggests that increased endogenous U-II constrains contractility in failing hearts via an autocrine or paracrine mechanism. These findings support a potential therapeutic role for UT-A in heart failure.
Authors: S A Douglas; A C Sulpizio; V Piercy; H M Sarau; R S Ames; N V Aiyar; E H Ohlstein; R N Willette Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Fraser D Russell; Deborah Meyers; Andrew J Galbraith; Nick Bett; Istvan Toth; Philip Kearns; Peter Molenaar Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2003-06-05 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Alex Tzanidis; Ross D Hannan; Walter G Thomas; Döne Onan; Dominic J Autelitano; Fiona See; Darren J Kelly; Richard E Gilbert; Henry Krum Journal: Circ Res Date: 2003-07-03 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Aidan P Bolger; Rakesh Sharma; Wei Li; Marjolein Leenarts; Paul R Kalra; Michael Kemp; Andrew J S Coats; Stefan D Anker; Michael A Gatzoulis Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-07-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Xiaoyin Shan; Michael P Quaile; Jeffery K Monk; Benjamin French; Thomas P Cappola; Kenneth B Margulies Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: D J Behm; N V Aiyar; A R Olzinski; J J McAtee; M A Hilfiker; J W Dodson; S E Dowdell; G Z Wang; K B Goodman; C A Sehon; M R Harpel; R N Willette; M J Neeb; C A Leach; S A Douglas Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Cristina Porras-González; Juan Ureña; Juan José Egea-Guerrero; Elena Gordillo-Escobar; Francisco Murillo-Cabezas; María del Carmen González-Montelongo; María Angeles Muñoz-Sánchez Journal: J Physiol Biochem Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 4.158
Authors: R Croft Thomas; Abhishek Singh; Patrick Cowley; Bat-Erdene Myagmar; Megan D Montgomery; Philip M Swigart; Teresa De Marco; Anthony J Baker; Paul C Simpson Journal: JACC Basic Transl Sci Date: 2016-04