BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently identified antagonists of the urotensin-II (U-II) receptor (UT) are of limited utility for investigating the (patho)physiological role of U-II due to poor potency and limited selectivity and/or intrinsic activity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The pharmacological properties of two novel UT antagonists, GSK1440115 and GSK1562590, were compared using multiple bioassays. KEY RESULTS: GSK1440115 (pK(i)= 7.34-8.64 across species) and GSK1562590 (pK(i)= 9.14-9.66 across species) are high affinity ligands of mammalian recombinant (mouse, rat, cat, monkey, human) and native (SJRH30 cells) UT. Both compounds exhibited >100-fold selectivity for UT versus 87 distinct mammalian GPCR, enzyme, ion channel and neurotransmitter uptake targets. GSK1440115 showed competitive antagonism at UT in arteries from all species tested (pA(2)= 5.59-7.71). In contrast, GSK1562590 was an insurmountable UT antagonist in rat, cat and hUT transgenic mouse arteries (pK(b)= 8.93-10.12 across species), but a competitive antagonist in monkey arteries (pK(b)= 8.87-8.93). Likewise, GSK1562590 inhibited the hU-II-induced systemic pressor response in anaesthetized cats at a dose 10-fold lower than that of GSK1440115. The antagonistic effects of GSK1440115, but not GSK1562590, could be reversed by washout in rat isolated aorta. In ex vivo studies, GSK1562590 inhibited hU-II-induced contraction of rat aorta for at least 24 h following dosing. Dissociation of GSK1562590 binding was considerably slower at rat than monkey UT. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Whereas both GSK1440115 and GSK1562590 represent high-affinity/selective UT antagonists suitable for assessing the (patho)physiological role of U-II, only GSK1562590 exhibited sustained UT residence time and improved preclinical efficacy in vivo.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently identified antagonists of the urotensin-II (U-II) receptor (UT) are of limited utility for investigating the (patho)physiological role of U-II due to poor potency and limited selectivity and/or intrinsic activity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The pharmacological properties of two novel UT antagonists, GSK1440115 and GSK1562590, were compared using multiple bioassays. KEY RESULTS:GSK1440115 (pK(i)= 7.34-8.64 across species) and GSK1562590 (pK(i)= 9.14-9.66 across species) are high affinity ligands of mammalian recombinant (mouse, rat, cat, monkey, human) and native (SJRH30 cells) UT. Both compounds exhibited >100-fold selectivity for UT versus 87 distinct mammalian GPCR, enzyme, ion channel and neurotransmitter uptake targets. GSK1440115 showed competitive antagonism at UT in arteries from all species tested (pA(2)= 5.59-7.71). In contrast, GSK1562590 was an insurmountable UT antagonist in rat, cat and hUT transgenic mouse arteries (pK(b)= 8.93-10.12 across species), but a competitive antagonist in monkey arteries (pK(b)= 8.87-8.93). Likewise, GSK1562590 inhibited the hU-II-induced systemic pressor response in anaesthetized cats at a dose 10-fold lower than that of GSK1440115. The antagonistic effects of GSK1440115, but not GSK1562590, could be reversed by washout in rat isolated aorta. In ex vivo studies, GSK1562590 inhibited hU-II-induced contraction of rat aorta for at least 24 h following dosing. Dissociation of GSK1562590 binding was considerably slower at rat than monkey UT. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Whereas both GSK1440115 and GSK1562590 represent high-affinity/selective UT antagonists suitable for assessing the (patho)physiological role of U-II, only GSK1562590 exhibited sustained UT residence time and improved preclinical efficacy in vivo.
Authors: Alex Tzanidis; Ross D Hannan; Walter G Thomas; Döne Onan; Dominic J Autelitano; Fiona See; Darren J Kelly; Richard E Gilbert; Henry Krum Journal: Circ Res Date: 2003-07-03 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Martine Clozel; Christoph Binkert; Magdalena Birker-Robaczewska; Céline Boukhadra; Shuang-Shuang Ding; Walter Fischli; Patrick Hess; Boris Mathys; Keith Morrison; Celia Müller; Claus Müller; Oliver Nayler; Changbin Qiu; Markus Rey; Michael W Scherz; Jörg Velker; Thomas Weller; Jian-Fei Xi; Patrick Ziltener Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2004-05-14 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Andrew Y Zhang; Ya-Fei Chen; David X Zhang; Fu-Xian Yi; Jenson Qi; Patricia Andrade-Gordon; Lawrence de Garavilla; Pin-Lan Li; Ai-Ping Zou Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2003-06-03
Authors: Stephen A Douglas; Diane Naselsky; Zhaohui Ao; Jyoti Disa; Christopher L Herold; Frank Lynch; Nambi V Aiyar Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2004-06-21 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Alison Portnoy; Sanjay Kumar; David J Behm; Kelly M Mahar; Robert B Noble; John P Throup; Steven F Russ Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 5.810