Literature DB >> 19807234

Patients who are near death are frequently unable to self-report dyspnea.

Margaret L Campbell1, Thomas Templin, Julia Walch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard measures of dyspnea rely on the patient's self-report. Declining consciousness and/or cognitive function and nearness to death may interfere with dyspnea reporting making the patient vulnerable to undertreatment or overtreatment.
METHODS: An observational design was used with 89 consecutive patients referred for inpatient palliative care consultation. Patients were included if they were at risk for dyspnea because of one or more of the following: lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, or pneumonia. Patients were asked "Are you short of breath?" and asked to quantify any distress by pointing to a visual analogue scale (VAS). Other measures included: consciousness, cognitive state, terminal illness severity, and patient demographics.
RESULTS: More than half of the patients (54%) were unable to provide a yes or no response. Only 20 of 41 (49%) able to respond with yes or no were able to quantify any distress with the VAS. Ability to self-report was positively associated with consciousness (p < 0.01), cognitive state (p < 0.01), and terminal illness severity (p < 0.01). A significant inverse relationship was found between consciousness and terminal illness severity (p < 0.01). Declines in consciousness and cognitive state were strongly correlated with nearness to death (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Declining consciousness and/or cognitive state are expected when patients are near death. The ability to give even the simplest self-report (yes or no) about dyspnea is lost in the near-death phase of terminal illness, yet the ability to experience distress may persist and may be overlooked and undertreated or overtreated. Other methods for symptom assessment are needed in this context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19807234     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  6 in total

1.  Intensity cut-points for the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale.

Authors:  Margaret L Campbell; Thomas N Templin
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.762

2.  Dyspnea in hospitalized advanced cancer patients: subjective and physiologic correlates.

Authors:  David Hui; Margarita Morgado; Marieberta Vidal; Laura Withers; Quan Nguyen; Gary Chisholm; Clarence Finch; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Is breathlessness what the professional says it is? Analysis of patient and professionals' assessments from a German nationwide register.

Authors:  Steffen T Simon; Nadine Altfelder; Bernd Alt-Epping; Claudia Bausewein; Vera Weingärtner; Raymond Voltz; Christoph Ostgathe; Lukas Radbruch; Gabriele Lindena; Friedemann Nauck
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Identification and evaluation of observational measures for the assessment and/or monitoring of level of consciousness in adult palliative care patients: A systematic review for I-CAN-CARE.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Krooupa; Bella Vivat; Stephen McKeever; Elena Marcus; Joseph Sawyer; Paddy Stone
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 5.713

5.  Dyspnea could be accurately assessed by a caregiver in hospitalized patients with respiratory diseases: Interrater reliability and agreement study.

Authors:  Gregory Reychler; Marc Beaumont; Anne-Claire Latiers; Thierry Pieters; Antoine Fremault
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Exploration and Development of a Simpler Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (modRDOS-4) as a Dyspnea Screening Tool: A Prospective Bedside Study.

Authors:  Ru Xin Wong; Ho Shirlynn; Yen Sin Koh; Stella Goh Seow Lin; Daniel Quah; Qingyuan Zhuang
Journal:  Palliat Med Rep       Date:  2021-01-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.