AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare hepatic standardized uptake values (SUVs) and hepatic metabolic volumetric products (HMVP) between patients of diffuse hepatic steatosis and control subjects with normal livers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven subjects were included in the study (13 men and 14 women; age range, 34-72 years). All had 18F-2-fluoro-2-D-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans with an interscan interval of 0-5 months. Twelve of 27 subjects had diffuse hepatic steatosis on MRI. The remaining 15 were selected as age-matched controls based on normal liver parenchyma on MRI. Mean and maximum hepatic SUVs were calculated for both patient groups on FDG-PET images. Hepatic volumes were measured from MRI. HMVP in each subject was subsequently calculated by multiplication of hepatic volume by mean hepatic SUV. HMVPs as well as mean and maximum hepatic SUVs were compared between the two study groups. RESULTS: HMVPs, mean hepatic SUVs, and maximum hepatic SUVs were greater (statistically significant, p < 0.05) in subjects with diffuse hepatic steatosis compared to those in the control group. CONCLUSION: The increase in HMVP is the result of increased hepatic metabolic activity likely related to the diffuse hepatic steatosis. The active inflammatory process related to the diffuse hepatic steatosis is the probable explanation for the increase in hepatic metabolic activity on FDG-PET study.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare hepatic standardized uptake values (SUVs) and hepatic metabolic volumetric products (HMVP) between patients of diffuse hepatic steatosis and control subjects with normal livers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven subjects were included in the study (13 men and 14 women; age range, 34-72 years). All had 18F-2-fluoro-2-D-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans with an interscan interval of 0-5 months. Twelve of 27 subjects had diffuse hepatic steatosis on MRI. The remaining 15 were selected as age-matched controls based on normal liver parenchyma on MRI. Mean and maximum hepatic SUVs were calculated for both patient groups on FDG-PET images. Hepatic volumes were measured from MRI. HMVP in each subject was subsequently calculated by multiplication of hepatic volume by mean hepatic SUV. HMVPs as well as mean and maximum hepatic SUVs were compared between the two study groups. RESULTS: HMVPs, mean hepatic SUVs, and maximum hepatic SUVs were greater (statistically significant, p < 0.05) in subjects with diffuse hepatic steatosis compared to those in the control group. CONCLUSION: The increase in HMVP is the result of increased hepatic metabolic activity likely related to the diffuse hepatic steatosis. The active inflammatory process related to the diffuse hepatic steatosis is the probable explanation for the increase in hepatic metabolic activity on FDG-PET study.
Authors: Jason M Hui; Alex Hodge; Geoffrey C Farrell; James G Kench; Adamandia Kriketos; Jacob George Journal: Hepatology Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Robert S McCuskey; Yoshiya Ito; Graham R Robertson; Margaret K McCuskey; Michael Perry; Geoffrey C Farrell Journal: Hepatology Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Nehal N Mehta; YiDing Yu; Babak Saboury; Negar Foroughi; Parasuram Krishnamoorthy; Anna Raper; Amanda Baer; Jules Antigua; Abby S Van Voorhees; Drew A Torigian; Abass Alavi; Joel M Gelfand Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2011-05-16
Authors: Georgia Keramida; Alexander Dunford; Guven Kaya; Constantinos D Anagnostopoulos; Adrien Michael Peters Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-06-05