The influence of different IMRT techniques on the peripheral dose: a comparison between sMLM-IMRT and helical tomotherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate how segmented multileaf modulation-(sMLM-)based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and dynamic helical tomotherapy (ToTh) affect the peripheral dose (PD) outside the treated region.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cuboid Perspex phantom was scanned in a computed tomograph. Different artificial cases were contoured consisting of OARs surrounded by cylindrically shaped planning target volumes (PTVs) with different dimensions. Radiotherapy plans were generated with the sMLM system Konrad (Siemens) and with the ToTh planning system. The plans were optimized in such a way that the dose-volume histograms showed comparable results. The sMLM plans were applied with a linac Primus (Siemens OCS), the ToTh plans with the HiArt system (TomoTherapy); both with 6 MV. Measurements of PDs were performed along the longitudinal axis of the phantom outside the primary beam at different distances from the edge of the PTV (horizontal PD) and also at different depths at a fixed distance from the isocenter (vertical PD). Additional experiments to separate the scatter dose caused by the phantom were performed. This was realized by removing the part of the phantom lying in the primary beam, then applying the same plans like before.
RESULTS: All PD values were normalized to the median dose of the PTV. The PD values for the different PTVs decrease with decreasing PTV size. They also decrease with increasing distance from the isocenter. The horizontal values are in a range of 7% for the largest PTV (diameter = 15 cm) near the primary dose region to 0.2% for the smallest PTV (diameter = 5 cm) far from the primary dose region. The ToTh values are higher than the sMLM values by a maximal factor of 2 near the primary dose region. They become more similar with increasing distance from the edge of the PTV in longitudinal direction. The PD values are nearly equal at a distance of 25 cm from the edge of the PTV. The vertical PDs are higher for the ToTh at depths of > 1 cm but higher for sMLM close to the surface. By removing the scatter cube, the horizontal PD values at middle distances are reduced to one third of the PD values with scatter cube for ToTh (0.5%) and to one half for sMLM (0.8%). This means that without scatter cube the PD for ToTh is lower than that for sMLM. The measured PD values without scatter cube are in the same dimension as published data.
CONCLUSION: The increasing PDs and their trend with increasing PTV size can be explained by Compton scattering of photons from the irradiated volume toward the off-axis measuring points. The further increase of the PD in case of ToTh relative to sMLM is not easy to explain. Different presumptions are possible. The larger field length (in longitudinal direction) of the ToTh plans (consisting of the "real" field length and the overlap) relative to the sMLM plans could be one reason for the higher PD values. The softer energy spectrum of the HiArt machine with more sideward Compton scattering contributions could be another reason.