Literature DB >> 19805677

Reporting of time-to-event end points and tracking of failures in randomized trials of radiotherapy with or without any concomitant anticancer agent for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Christophe Le Tourneau1, Stefan Michiels, Hui K Gan, Lillian L Siu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: For multiple reasons, including complexities in anatomy and management, locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHNs) represent a challenging disease for the reporting of end points and the tracking of failures.
METHODS: We retrieved all randomized trials published in English that began accrual on or after 1978 and enrolled previously untreated patients with nonmetastatic SCCHN receiving primary radiotherapy with or without any concomitant anticancer agent. The reporting of time-to-event end points and the tracking of failures in these trials were analyzed. Failures were defined as events meeting a prespecified end point definition.
RESULTS: Forty trials involving a total of 125 time-to-event end points were identified. A total of 17 different types of end points were reported. Locoregional control and overall survival accounted for 70% of primary end points. Except for survival, the definitions used for all other end points were heterogeneous. Among 72 end points tracking locoregional failures, 29% did not define the term, whereas 64% specified the absence of complete response as a failure. Overall, the specification of details related to elective neck dissection or salvage surgery to define locoregional failures was deficient. Furthermore, it was rarely stated whether residual disease found during these procedures represents a failure. The methods and timing specifications to assess failures were frequently missing in published reports. The tracking of other types of failure beyond the first failure was reported in only one trial.
CONCLUSION: These results support the need to standardize the selection, definition, and reporting of time-to-event end points in clinical trials of locally advanced SCCHN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19805677     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  5 in total

Review 1.  Endpoints and cutpoints in head and neck oncology trials: methodical background, challenges, current practice and perspectives.

Authors:  Marcus Hezel; Kathrin von Usslar; Thiemo Kurzweg; Balazs B Lörincz; Rainald Knecht
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Trends in endpoint selection in clinical trials of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Song; Heenam Seo; Gyungjin Kim; Ah Rong Kim; Eun Young Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Understanding competing risks: a simulation point of view.

Authors:  Arthur Allignol; Martin Schumacher; Christoph Wanner; Christiane Drechsler; Jan Beyersmann
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  A phase I dose-escalation study of lenalidomide in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Gustav J Ullenhag; Eva Rossmann; Maria Liljefors
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Reporting and methodological quality of survival analysis in articles published in Chinese oncology journals.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhu; Xiaobin Zhou; Yuan Zhang; Xiao Sun; Haihua Liu; Yingying Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.