Literature DB >> 19805445

Observed universality of phase transitions in high-dimensional geometry, with implications for modern data analysis and signal processing.

David Donoho1, Jared Tanner.   

Abstract

We review connections between phase transitions in high-dimensional combinatorial geometry and phase transitions occurring in modern high-dimensional data analysis and signal processing. In data analysis, such transitions arise as abrupt breakdown of linear model selection, robust data fitting or compressed sensing reconstructions, when the complexity of the model or the number of outliers increases beyond a threshold. In combinatorial geometry, these transitions appear as abrupt changes in the properties of face counts of convex polytopes when the dimensions are varied. The thresholds in these very different problems appear in the same critical locations after appropriate calibration of variables. These thresholds are important in each subject area: for linear modelling, they place hard limits on the degree to which the now ubiquitous high-throughput data analysis can be successful; for robustness, they place hard limits on the degree to which standard robust fitting methods can tolerate outliers before breaking down; for compressed sensing, they define the sharp boundary of the undersampling/sparsity trade-off curve in undersampling theorems. Existing derivations of phase transitions in combinatorial geometry assume that the underlying matrices have independent and identically distributed Gaussian elements. In applications, however, it often seems that Gaussianity is not required. We conducted an extensive computational experiment and formal inferential analysis to test the hypothesis that these phase transitions are universal across a range of underlying matrix ensembles. We ran millions of linear programs using random matrices spanning several matrix ensembles and problem sizes; visually, the empirical phase transitions do not depend on the ensemble, and they agree extremely well with the asymptotic theory assuming Gaussianity. Careful statistical analysis reveals discrepancies that can be explained as transient terms, decaying with problem size. The experimental results are thus consistent with an asymptotic large-n universality across matrix ensembles; finite-sample universality can be rejected.

Year:  2009        PMID: 19805445     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2009.0152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  24 in total

1.  Statistical challenges of high-dimensional data.

Authors:  Iain M Johnstone; D Michael Titterington
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing.

Authors:  David L Donoho; Arian Maleki; Andrea Montanari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Deterministic matrices matching the compressed sensing phase transitions of Gaussian random matrices.

Authors:  Hatef Monajemi; Sina Jafarpour; Matan Gavish; David L Donoho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Toward deterministic compressed sensing.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Blanchard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The phase transition of matrix recovery from Gaussian measurements matches the minimax MSE of matrix denoising.

Authors:  David L Donoho; Matan Gavish; Andrea Montanari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  EMPIRICAL AVERAGE-CASE RELATION BETWEEN UNDERSAMPLING AND SPARSITY IN X-RAY CT.

Authors:  Jakob S Jørgensen; Emil Y Sidky; Per Christian Hansen; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Inverse Probl Imaging (Springfield)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.639

7.  Compressive sensing in medical imaging.

Authors:  Christian G Graff; Emil Y Sidky
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 1.980

8.  Discovering sparse transcription factor codes for cell states and state transitions during development.

Authors:  Leon A Furchtgott; Samuel Melton; Vilas Menon; Sharad Ramanathan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Beyond Fourier.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Hoch
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  High-frequency subband compressed sensing MRI using quadruplet sampling.

Authors:  Kyunghyun Sung; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.