Literature DB >> 19804633

Variants of ESR1, APOE, LPL and IL-6 loci in young healthy subjects: association with lipid status and obesity.

Jadranka Sertic1, Ljiljana Juricic, Hana Ljubic, Tamara Bozina, Jasna Lovric, Jasenka Markeljevic, Bojan Jelakovic, Marijan Merkler, Zeljko Reiner.   

Abstract

FINDINGS: BMI was increased (>25) in 22% of young healthy subjects. Increased cholesterol values (>5.0 mmol/L) were found in 23% of subjects, LDL-C (>3.0 mmol/L) in 23%, triglycerides (>1.7 mmol/L) in 11% of subjects. We found statistically significant differences in subjects' weight (p = 0.015), BMI (p = 0.023), and waist-hip ratio (WHR) (p = 0.015) in regard to their diet type; subjects with Mediterranean diet had the lowest values compared to those on continental and mixed diet. Significant associations were found for: LPL genetic polymorphic variant and abdominal obesity (p = 0.013), APO epsilon4 allele and hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.003), and ESR1-TA long allele and hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.011).
BACKGROUND: Human obesity is a multifactorial syndrome influenced also by genetic factors. Among gene variants found to be involved in body weight regulation and development of obesity, particular attention has been paid to polymorphisms in genes associated with obesity-related metabolic disorders. We explored the association of genetic polymorphisms of: estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1-TA repeats); interleukin-6 (IL-6 G-174C); apolipoprotein E (APO epsilon2, epsilon3, epsilon4); lipoprotein lipase Pvu II (LPL P+/-), with clinical variables: gender, age, body mass index (BMI), diet type and biological variables: triglycerides, cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, CRP, homocysteine, urate, and glucose in 105 healthy young subjects (20-35 yrs) of Croatian origin.
METHODS: Genotyping of IL-6, LPL was performed by PCR-RFLP, of APOE by real-time PCR, and of ESR1 by PCR and capillary electrophoresis. Association analyses were performed of alleles and genotypes with biological variables.
CONCLUSION: ESR-1, LPL, and APO E genetic polymorphic variants could represent predictive genetic risk markers for obesity-related metabolic disorders in young healthy subjects. Mediterranean type of diet is also an important protective factor against abdominal obesity.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19804633      PMCID: PMC2765961          DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


Background

Obesity has become an extensive public health concern because its prevalence has increased to epidemic proportions. Many gene variants are involved in development of obesity and body weight regulation [1-3]. The most frequently investigated gene polymorphisms are APOE, adiponectin (ADIPOQ), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), methyltetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), IL-6, and estrogen receptors α and β (ESR1, ESR2) [4-7]. Our study was focused on ESR1 (L-long TA repeats; S-short TA repeats), APOE, IL-6 and LPL in young healthy population. Estrogen appears to be involved in protection against obesity and regulation of food intake. ESR1 is expressed mainly by adipocytes and it lowers the lipolytic response in subcutaneous fat by increasing the number of antilipolytic adrenoreceptors. BMI, waist circumference and HDL cholesterol levels have been associated with ESR1 polymorphisms. A long genotype group of a common thymine-adenine (TA) dinucleotide repeat polymorphism in the regulatory region of ESR1 has been associated with coronary artery disease. There is also possibility that carriers of the long repeat are marked by decreased expression of the ESR1 gene and that they have less cardiovascular protective effects from estrogen than carriers of the short alleles [8-10]. APOE alleles and genetic variants of IL-6 have also been established to be factors of susceptibility to obesity [1]. Data on C-174G polymorphism of IL-6 suggest that it affects the IL-6 transcription rate and plays a role in the development of obesity and insulin sensitivity [11]. LPL PvuII polymorphism is associated with high cholesterol levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases [12,13]. In our previous investigations ACE [14] and APOE [15-17] were confirmed to be metabolic risk factors. In this study we tried to identify some genetic variables associated with lipid status and obesity in young healthy subjects.

Methods

Human subjects

A total of 105 young healthy subjects (58 female, 47 male), aged 20-35 years, participated in the study. They completed a questionnaire on family history of cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, obesity, taking medications, smoking and diet. All participants signed informed consent forms, and the study protocol was approved by Ethics Committee. BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/height (square meter), and WHR was calculated as the ratio of abdomen or waist to hip circumference. Blood samples for biochemical analyses (total cholesterol, LDL- and HDL-cholesterol, glucose, CRP, urate) were collected after overnight fasting and analyzed.

DNA extraction and genotyping

ESR1-TA repeats

Dinucleotide polymorphism of ESR1 was analyzed using PCR amplification with labeled primer 5'-6-FAM-GAC GCA TGA TAT ACT TCA CC-3' and 5' - GCA GAA TCA AAT ATC CAG ATG-3'. PCR was performed with 25 cycles that consisted of 2 min at 94°C, 1 min at 58°C, and 1 min at 72°C, followed by 30 min at 60°C after the last cycle. The alleles were size-separated by capillary gel electrophoresis using Gene Scan Fragment Analysis Software 4.0. In short, 1 μl of the product was diluted with 12 μl of deionized formamide containing 0.5 μl GeneScan-500 ROX internal lane standard for sizing DNA fragments. Capillary electrophoresis was then carried out using ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer and POP-6 that had been formulated for applications requiring high resolution under denaturing electrophoretic conditions [8].

IL-6 G-174C

The primers used in the PCR were: 5' TGACTTCAGCTTTACTCTTTGT 3' and 5' CTGATTGGAAACCTTAT TAAG 3'. The reaction was carried out in a final volume of 50 μl containing 1.5 mmol/l of MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/l of each dNTP, 0.2 mmol/l of each primer, and 2.5 unit of Taq polymerase. DNA was amplified during 35 cycles with an initial denaturation of 10 minutes at 94°C and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The cycle program consisted of 1 minute denaturation at 94°C, 1 minute and 35 s annealing at 55°C and 1 min extension at 72°C. PCR products were digested with Nla III restriction enzyme at 37°C overnight and electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel with ethidium bromide staining. The identified genotypes were named according to the presence or absence of the enzyme restriction sites, so Nla III (GG), (GC), and (CC) are homozygotes for the presence of the site (140/58 bp), heterozygotes for the presence and absence of the site (198/140/58 bp), and homozygotes for the absence of the site (198 bp), respectively [11].

LPL P+/- and APOE epsilon2, epsilon3, epsilon4

LPL P+/- was determined using PCR-RFLP and agarose gel electrophoresis technique, as previously described in [13] APOE genotyping was performed by applying DNA assay that uses rapid-cycle PCR and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) with the LightCycler. In the assay, a 265-bp fragment of exon 4 of the APOE gene was amplified from genomic DNA. The detection probes that cover codons 112 and 158 were 5' labeled with LC-Red 640 and LC-Red 705, respectively [18].

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to present all sociodemographic and clinical features of subjects. Data were given as means +/- standard deviations (SD) and frequencies/percents, as appropriate. Statistical analyses were performed to: 1) Study the associations of sociodemographics and all clinical features (Table 1) with metabolic parameters. The differences between mean values of metabolic parameters (BMI, abdominal obesity, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, glucose, blood pressure, CRP and urate) among different groups according to clinical features and sociodemographics were determined using t-tests for independent samples or analysis of variance, as appropriate. In case of significant differences between groups, logistic regression was performed to test for the predictors of BMI, abdominal obesity, high cholesterol, high LDL, low HDL, high triglycerides, glucose intolerance, hypertension, abnormal CRP and urate. For that purpose variables describing metabolic status (BMI, abdominal obesity, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, glucose, CRP and urate) were grouped in categories according to their normal values - described in Table 2.
Table 1

Sociodemographic and clinical data of subjects (N = 105)

Mean +/- SD
Age (yrs)25.82 +/-3.28
Weight (kg)73.99+/-16.09
Height (cm)175+/-10.53
BMI (kg/m2)23.48+/-3.81
Waist (cm)83.61+/-12.04
Hip (cm)103.23+/-8.32
WHR0.81 +/- 0.8
Triglycerides (mmol/L)1.08+/-0.55
Cholesterol (mmol/L)4.53+/-0.96
HDL-C (mmol/L)1.45+/-0.3
LDL-C (mmol/L)2.59+/-0.85
CRP (mg/L)1.34+/-1.61
CRP (mg/L)1.34+/-1.61
Glucose (mmol/L)5.03+/-0.45
Urate (mmol/L)292.70+/-76.35
Table 2

Clinical and metabolic parameters of subjects (N = 105)

FeatureFrequencyPercent
Somatic illnessNo7874.3
Cardiovascular illness43.8
Other illnesses1413.3
SmokingYes6763.8
No3129.5
MedicationsNo8782.9
With known effects on investigated features (Contraceptives)98.6
Other medications43.8
Elevated hepatic enzymesNo7773.3
Yes1918.1
DietContinental7571.4
Mediterranean1312.4
Mixed109.5
Positive family historyNo2523.8
Diabetes1211.4
Cardiovascular disease3230.5
Obesity21.9
More than one3432.4
Hypertension (>135/85 mmHg)No7975.2
Yes1918.1
BMI (kg/m2)<257773.3
25.01-302321.9
> 30.0154.8
Abdominal obesity (WHR >90 (M), >85 (F)No8583.3
Yes1716.7
Hypertriglyceridemia (>1.7 mmol/L)No9388.6
Yes1211.4
Hypercholesterolemia (>5 mmol/L)No8177.1
Yes2422.9
HDL-C (<1.0 mmol/L)No9893.3
Yes76.7
LDL-C (>3 mmol/L)No8177.1
Yes2422.9
Glucose levels (>6.4 mmol/L)Hypoglycemia43.8
Normal10095.2
Hyperglycemia11.0
CRP levels (mg/L)< 16158.1
1-33432.4
> 3109.5
Elevated urate levels (>383 mmol/L)No9388.6
Yes1211.4

M - male; F - female; HDL-C - high density lipoprotein; LDL-C - low density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP - C-reactive protein

Sociodemographic and clinical data of subjects (N = 105) Clinical and metabolic parameters of subjects (N = 105) M - male; F - female; HDL-C - high density lipoprotein; LDL-C - low density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP - C-reactive protein 2) Study the association of genetic variants with lipid status and BMI. For that purpose variables describing metabolic status (BMI, abdominal obesity, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, glucose, blood pressure, CRP and urate) were again grouped in categories as described in Table 2. Associations of alleles, genotypes and haplotypes with biological variables were established using UNPHASED-3.0.10. Sex and age were used as covariates [19,20]. The sequential Bonferroni adjustments (Holm, 1979; Rice, 1989) were applied to correct for the effect of multiple tests using SAS Release 8.02 (SAS Institute, 1999).

Results

Basic characteristics of 105 study participants are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. Age of the subjects was 25.82 +/- 3.28 years. BMI values ranging between 25 - 30 were found in 21.9% of subjects. Positive family history for obesity was established in 32.4% of subjects. Hypertriglyceridemia was detected in 11.4% of subjects. 12.4% of subjects were on Mediterranean diet. In addition, increased CRP levels were found in 9.5% of our subjects, and elevated urate levels in 11.4%. Out of 105 subjects, 9 were taking medication for cardiovascular diseases, 4 were taking other medications, for 5 subjects data were missing and the rest (N = 87) were not using medications at the time of the study. We found an association between BMI and diet type. Differences in weight, BMI, waist measures, and WHR of subjects with regard to diet type (continental, Mediterranean, mixed type) were significant (p = 0.015; p = 0.023; p = 0.01; p = 0.015, respectively) (Table 3). Post hoc analysis showed that mixed type of diet contributed to significantly different weight, waist and BMI of subjects compared to those having the other two types of diet, whereas Mediterranean diet contributed to significantly different WHR compared to subjects on the other two types of diet (Table 3). However, logistic regression did not confirm diet type as a predictor of abdominal obesity and BMI (data not shown). The most favorable results in weight, BMI, WHR measurement were established for subjects on Mediterranean diet (as compared to continental and mixed diet): the type of diet, as an environmental factor, was found to have considerable impact on health of young population. Further, analysis of association between ESR1 genetic polymorphisms and APOE and hypercholesterolemia is presented in Table 4. In relation to hypercholesterolemia, a significant interaction was found for ESR1-L allele (p = 0.011; df = 1; X2 = 6.391). Significant association was also established between APOE4 and hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.003; df = 2; X2 = 11.46) (Table 4). Abdominal obesity was correlated to LPL P+/-, P+/+ genotypes (p = 0.013; df = 2; X2 = 7.794) in a significant manner (Table 5). WHR (>0.9 -M, 0.85 - F) was found to be a good indicator or the risk for obesity among heterozygous and homozygous subjects for LPL genotype.
Table 3

Differences in weight, BMI, waist and WHR of subjects with regard to their diet type

DietANOVA,LSD post hoc,
ContinentalMediterraneanMixedp valuep values (only significant)
Weight (kg)74+/14.5666.61+/- 15.8486+/-23.86F = 4.365, p = 0.015Mixed vs. continental, MD = 12.18, p = 0.025Mixed vs. Mediterranean, MD = 19.58, p = 0.004
BMI (kg/m2)23.5+/-3.2121.73+/-2.8526.15+/-7.31F = 3.915, p = 0.023Mixed vs. continental, MD = 2.65, p = 0.039Mixed vs. Mediterranean, MD = 4.42, p = 0.006
Waist (cm)83.65+/-11.0476.77+/-10.8392.1+/-17.37F = 4.803, p = 0.01Mixed vs. continental, MD = 8.45, p = 0.036Mixed vs. Mediterranean, MD = 15.33, p = 0.003
WHR0.81+/-0.070.76+/-0.080.86+/-0.09F = 4.421, p = 0.015Mediterranean vs. continental, MD = -0.05, p = 0.042Mediterranean vs. mixed, MD = -0.095, p = 0.004

MD = mean difference

Table 4

Association of ESR1 and APOE genetic polymorphisms and hypercholesterolemia

Cholesterol < 5 mmol/LCholesterol > 5 mmol/LORCITest p value
ESR1*AllelesS871411-1X2 = 6.391
L77302.4211.242-4.72df = 1
p = 0.011
GenotypesSS22311-1X2 = 7.147
LS4381.3640.3288-5.661df = 2
LL17114.7451.141-19.73p = 0.028
APOE**Allelesε221111-1X2 = 11.46
ε3123325.4630.6664-44.79df = 2
ε4141116.51.366-199.2p = 0.003
Genotypes222011-1X2 = 14.98
231508.413e-0068.413e-006-8.413e-006df = 4p = 0.004
24211.285e+0082.495e+007-6.62e+008
3348115.891e+0072.27e+007-1.529e+008
3412102.1424+00887.876e+007-5.825e+008

APOE = apolipoprotein E

ESR1 = estrogen receptor alpha

* Means+/-SD of SS, LS and LL were 4.2+/-0.9; 4.56+/-0.97; 4.81+/-0.89, respectively

** Means+/-SD of 22, 23, 24, 33 and 34 were 3.65+/-0.92; 3.89+/-0.58; 3,83+/-1.44; 4,51+/-0.74; 4.51+/-0.95, respectively

Table 5

LPL genotyping results that indicate a risk associated with abdominal obesity

WHR<0.9 (M); <0.85 (F)WHR>0.9 (M); >0.85 (F)ORCITestp value
AllelesP-901811-1X2 = 1.158
P+68220.66410.203-2.18df = 1
LPLp = 0.272
GenotypesP-/-26211-1X2 = 7.794
P-/+38140.10570.01-0.86df = 2
P+/+1540.280.023-3.37p = 0.013

LPL = lipoprotein lipase

OR = Odds ratio

CI = confidence interval

* Means+/-SD of P-/-, P-/+ and P+/+ were 0.83+/-0.07; 0.79+/-0.08; 0.79+/-0.08, respectively

Differences in weight, BMI, waist and WHR of subjects with regard to their diet type MD = mean difference Association of ESR1 and APOE genetic polymorphisms and hypercholesterolemia APOE = apolipoprotein E ESR1 = estrogen receptor alpha * Means+/-SD of SS, LS and LL were 4.2+/-0.9; 4.56+/-0.97; 4.81+/-0.89, respectively ** Means+/-SD of 22, 23, 24, 33 and 34 were 3.65+/-0.92; 3.89+/-0.58; 3,83+/-1.44; 4,51+/-0.74; 4.51+/-0.95, respectively LPL genotyping results that indicate a risk associated with abdominal obesity LPL = lipoprotein lipase OR = Odds ratio CI = confidence interval * Means+/-SD of P-/-, P-/+ and P+/+ were 0.83+/-0.07; 0.79+/-0.08; 0.79+/-0.08, respectively Association between blood pressure and IL-6 CC genotype was not found to reach statistical significance (p = 0.069; df = 2; X2 = 5.326) (Table 6). Nevertheless, it was substantial enough to indicate an important correlation between high blood pressure and IL-6 (CC-genotype), which should be examined on a larger study sample.
Table 6

Association of IL-6 genetic polymorphisms and blood pressure

BP < 135/85BP > 135/85ORCITestp value
IL-6AllelesC952011-1X 2 = 0.952df = 1
G71101.4950.78-2.86p = 0.329
GenotypesCC30911-1X 2 = 5.326
CG3525.251.05-26.21df = 2
GG1841.350.363-5.03p = 0.069

BP = blood pressure

OR = Odds ratio

CI = confidence interval

Association of IL-6 genetic polymorphisms and blood pressure BP = blood pressure OR = Odds ratio CI = confidence interval

Discussion

Genetic biomarkers have an increasing impact in laboratory medicine. They are currently used to predict disease onset or disease recurrence, and to individualize treatment and assess response to treatment. We found an association between BMI and diet type. Differences in weight, BMI, waist measures, and WHR of subjects with regard to diet type (continental, Mediterranean, mixed type) were indicative. Subjects on Mediterranean diet had the best results with regard to BMI and WHR, which confirmed the assumption that the type of diet could have a substantial effect on the health of young subjects. Further, association was also established between ESR1 and APOE genetic polymorphisms and hypercholesterolemia. Actually, our finding was confirmed by results of other studies [1] who found positive correlation between APOE polymorphism and hypercholesterolemia. Association between estrogen receptor-alpha gene polymorphisms and coronary artery disease with familial hypercholesterolemia was previously reported in other studies [21]. Complex approach includes multiple genetic markers, gene expression, and functional protein. Such complex approach is needed for understanding physiopathology and etiology of metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease, and leads to development of biomarkers for prevention of disease. Possible metabolic biomarkers that we examined in our study are CRP and urate: we found elevated levels (9.5%; 11.4%, respectively) of these metabolic parameters, and similar results in young adults were reported previously [22,23]. Recent data also suggest that elevated serum CRP and urate levels may contribute to the development of coronary artery disease [24]. It has been established that men with long alleles at the ESR1 promoter TA repeat have significantly more narrowed coronaries, larger areas of complicated lesions, and more calcification of coronary arteries than men with short alleles. A recent Finnish study proposed that long-repeat carriers have lower expression of the ESR1 gene and less cardiovascular protective effects from estrogen than carriers of short alleles [8]. In our study, we found an association between ESR1 long TA allele and hypercholesterolemia in young healthy subjects and it could represent a possible risk factor for developing metabolic disorder and cardiovascular disease. For genetic prediction of disease risk, it is important to identify functional gene polymorphism in order to establish genotype-phenotype correlation. Polymorphisms can be associated with either health (low risk predictors) or possible development of disease (high risk predictors; hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease). Adipogenesis-related genes such as PPAR gamma and genes related to cytokines such as IL-6 and lipid metabolism including LPL have also been associated to the weight lowering outcome induced by hypocaloric diets [25]. Efforts to reduce cholesterol level in order to prevent coronary heart disease have led to declined mortality. However, new information in this regard have recently been recorded in western countries: a decreasing trend in HDL cholesterol and increasing trends in obesity and triglycerides [26]. In literature, correlation between LPL polymorphisms and obesity has remained controversial; however, we found evidence of this association in our study. Actually, presence of LPL P+/-, P+/+ genotypes that we investigated in our study might, as a predictive risk factor related to obesity-related metabolic disorder, indicate the need for individualized diet adjustments. A study reported previously [27] evaluated the role of IL-6-174G>C polymorphism in the risk of developing metabolic alterations in people with excessive body weight. Their data demonstrated that the occurrence of C allele of IL-6-174G>C gene polymorphism in people with excessive body weight was accompanied by increased risk of developing obesity-related metabolic disorders, especially insulin resistance. Regardless of age and gender, subjects with IL-6 C and PPAR gamma variants had lower BMI and plasma triglyceride levels than those carrying only one of these variants. Thus, it might be possible that IL-6 gene polymorphism alone has none or only slight effects; its effects may be apparent only in the presence of a factor like PPAR gamma [4]. The influence of interleukin-6 G-174C gene polymorphism on coronary artery disease, cardiovascular complications and mortality in dialysis patients was described in a previously reported study. Their results suggest that IL-6 gene G-174C polymorphism is associated with the incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality in chronic dialysis patients [28]. Although this indicates an important correlation between high blood pressure and IL-6 genotype, larger studies are needed to confirm this significance.

Conclusion

Results of examining correlation between weight, BMI and WHR and continental, Mediterranean and mixed diet showed optimal values in subjects on Mediterranean diet. Statistically significant correlation was detected between ESR1 long allele and total cholesterol. We also found statistically significant associations of APOE 2/3 and APOE3/4 genotypes with lowered and increased cholesterol levels, respectively. Statistically significant association was observed between LPL P+/- polymorphism and abdominal obesity. These three polymorphisms indicate an association with traits that characterize lipid status and obesity.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JS is a coordinator of the project involved in genotyping data quality control, interpretation and finalizing the manuscript; MM, ZR and BJ helped in conceptualizing the study and provided intellectual input; LJ and HL carried out molecular genetic studies and sample collection; TB participated in statistical analyses and data interpretation; JM and JL participated in manuscript drafting and data interpretation. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
  25 in total

1.  The LightCycler: a microvolume multisample fluorimeter with rapid temperature control.

Authors:  C T Wittwer; K M Ririe; R V Andrew; D A David; R A Gundry; U J Balis
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.993

2.  Association of estrogen receptor-alpha gene polymorphisms with coronary artery disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Hong Lu; Toshinori Higashikata; Akihiro Inazu; Atsushi Nohara; Wenxin Yu; Masami Shimizu; Hiroshi Mabuchi
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 8.311

3.  ApoE genotyping and response to galanthamine in Alzheimer's disease--a real life retrospective study.

Authors:  Tomislav Babić; Darija Mahović Lakusić; Jadranka Sertić; Mladen Petrovecki; Ana Stavljenić-Rukavina
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2004-06

4.  Association between deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and cerebral atherosclerosis.

Authors:  J Sertic; D Hebrang; D Janus; B Salzer; M Niksić; D Cvorisćec; A Stavljenić-Rukavina
Journal:  Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1996-04

5.  Role of interaction between variants in the PPARG and interleukin-6 genes on obesity related metabolic risk factors.

Authors:  M Barbieri; M R Rizzo; M Papa; R Acampora; L De Angelis; F Olivieri; F Marchegiani; C Franceschi; G Paolisso
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.032

6.  Apolipoprotein E phenotypes and genotypes as determined by polymerase chain reaction using allele-specific oligonucleotide probes and the amplification refractory mutation system in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  A Stavljenic-Rukavina; J Sertic; B Salzer; M Dumic; A Radica; K Fumic; A Krajina
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1993-07-16       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 7.  The STANISLAS Cohort: a 10-year follow-up of supposed healthy families. Gene-environment interactions, reference values and evaluation of biomarkers in prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Sophie Visvikis-Siest; Gérard Siest
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Physical activity and the association of common FTO gene variants with body mass index and obesity.

Authors:  Evadnie Rampersaud; Braxton D Mitchell; Toni I Pollin; Mao Fu; Haiqing Shen; Jeffery R O'Connell; Julie L Ducharme; Scott Hines; Paul Sack; Rosalie Naglieri; Alan R Shuldiner; Soren Snitker
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-08

Review 9.  Genetic risk factors for stroke and carotid atherosclerosis: insights into pathophysiology from candidate gene approaches.

Authors:  Steve E Humphries; Laleh Morgan
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 44.182

10.  Impact of estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms and mRNA levels on obesity and lipolysis--a cohort study.

Authors:  Maria Nilsson; Ingrid Dahlman; Hong Jiao; Jan-Ake Gustafsson; Peter Arner; Karin Dahlman-Wright
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 2.103

View more
  7 in total

1.  Lipocalin 2 deficiency alters estradiol production and estrogen receptor signaling in female mice.

Authors:  Hong Guo; Yuanyuan Zhang; David A Brockman; Wendy Hahn; David A Bernlohr; Xiaoli Chen
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  Association of gene variants with lipid levels in response to fenofibrate is influenced by metabolic syndrome status.

Authors:  Mary F Feitosa; Ping An; Jose M Ordovas; Shamika Ketkar; Paul N Hopkins; Robert J Straka; Donna K Arnett; Ingrid B Borecki
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.162

3.  Association between ESR1 rs1884051 polymorphism and dietary total energy and plant protein intake on obesity in Korean men.

Authors:  Miae Doo; Yangha Kim
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 1.926

4.  Lipid metabolism is associated with developmental epigenetic programming.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Marchlewicz; Dana C Dolinoy; Lu Tang; Samantha Milewski; Tamara R Jones; Jaclyn M Goodrich; Tanu Soni; Steven E Domino; Peter X K Song; Charles F Burant; Vasantha Padmanabhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  ApoE rs429358 and rs7412 Polymorphism and Gender Differences of Serum Lipid Profile and Cognition in Aging Chinese Population.

Authors:  Jie Zhen; Xiaochen Huang; Nicholas Van Halm-Lutterodt; Shengqi Dong; Weiwei Ma; Rong Xiao; Linhong Yuan
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Mixed modeling of meta-analysis P-values (MixMAP) suggests multiple novel gene loci for low density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Authors:  Andrea S Foulkes; Gregory J Matthews; Ujjwal Das; Jane F Ferguson; Rongheng Lin; Muredach P Reilly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Association between obesity categories with cardiovascular disease and its related risk factors in the MASHAD cohort study population.

Authors:  Hamideh Ghazizadeh; Seyed Mohammad Reza Mirinezhad; Zahra Asadi; Seyed Mostafa Parizadeh; Reza Zare-Feyzabadi; Niloofar Shabani; Marziyeh Eidi; Ehsan Mosa Farkhany; Habibollah Esmaily; Ali Asghar Mahmoudi; Mohsen Mouhebati; Mohammad Reza Oladi; Mohadeseh Rohban; Payam Sharifan; Mehran Yadegari; Fatemeh Saeidi; Gordon A Ferns; Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.