Literature DB >> 19801933

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on benign anastomotic stricture formations after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction: results from a randomized clinical trial.

Jan Johansson1, Stefan Oberg, Jörgen Wenner, Thomas Zilling, Folke Johnsson, Christer Staël von Holstein, Bruno Walther.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduced the prevalence of benign anastomotic strictures after uncomplicated esophagectomies with gastric tube reconstruction and circular stapled anastomoses. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Benign anastomotic strictures are associated with anastomotic leaks or conduit ischemia. Also patients without those complications develop benign anastomotic strictures. We hypothesize that patients without postoperative anastomotic complications may develop benign anastomotic strictures due to exposure of acid gastric tube contents to the anastomotic area, and that the formation of such strictures may be reduced by prophylactic use of PPIs.
METHODS: Eighty patients without preoperative chemo- or radiotherapy, without clinical or radiological signs of anastomotic leaks were included in this clinical trial. The patients were randomized to b.i.d. PPIs or no treatment for 1 year. Benign anastomotic strictures were defined as anastomotic narrowing not allowing a standard diagnostic endoscope to pass without dilatation. The study was registered in the EudraCT database (2009-009997-28) for clinical trials.
RESULTS: : Seventy-nine patients were evaluated. Benign anastomotic strictures developed in 5/39 (13%) patients in the PPI group and in 18/40 (45%) in the control group (RR 5.6, 95% CI: 2.0-15.9, P = 0.001). The use of a narrower 25 mm cartridge as compared to a wider 28 or 31 mm cartridge significantly increased stricture formations (RR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1-7.6, P = 0.025).
CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic PPI treatment reduced the prevalence of benign anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and circular stapled anastomoses. Larger sized circular staple cartridges additionally reduced the stricture prevalence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19801933     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bcb139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  10 in total

1.  Long-term quality of life after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Silvio Däster; Savas D Soysal; Lea Stoll; Ralph Peterli; Markus von Flüe; Christoph Ackermann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kohei Nakata; Eishi Nagai; Kenoki Ohuchida; Katsuya Nakamura; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series.

Authors:  L Findlay; C Yao; D H Bennett; R Byrom; N Davies
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  An analysis of the risk factors of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Koji Tanaka; Tomoki Makino; Makoto Yamasaki; Takahiko Nishigaki; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosoi; Tetsuya Abe; Norihisa Uemura; Eiji Higaki; Ryosuke Kawai; Jiro Kawakami; Byonggu An; Masato Nagino; Yasuhiro Shimizu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Long-term health-related quality of life for disease-free esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Claire L Donohoe; Erin McGillycuddy; John V Reynolds
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  He Liu; Limei Shan; Jian Wang; Rong Zhai; Yining Zhu; Fei Yao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.453

8.  Quality of life measurements as an indicator for timing of support after oesophagectomy for cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marlene Malmström; Rosemarie Klefsgard; Bodil Ivarsson; Maria Roman; Jan Johansson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  The role of one-year endoscopic follow-up for the esophageal remnant and gastric conduit after esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Seong Yong Park; Hyun-Sung Lee; Hee-Jin Jang; Jong Yeul Lee; Jungnam Joo; Jae Ill Zo
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Prevalence and risk factors of reflux after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Samina Park; Chang Hyun Kang; Hyun Joo Lee; In Kyu Park; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.005

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.