Literature DB >> 19800671

Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to less invasiveness? A prospective comparative study.

Liao-Yuan Li1, Xin Gao, Ming Yang, Jie-Fang Li, Hai-Bin Zhang, Wen-Feng Xu, Zhe Lin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the systemic response to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and mini-PCNL (MPCNL) and evaluate whether MPCNL is less invasive than PCNL, as experimental studies suggest that the acute-phase reaction is proportional to surgery-induced tissue damage.
METHODS: In all, 165 consecutive patients who had undergone MPCNL (93) or PCNL (72) were prospectively assessed. Blood samples were collected 24 hours before; during surgery; at the end of anesthesia; and 12, 24, and 36 hours after surgery. The extent of the systemic response to surgery-induced tissue trauma was measured, by assessing the levels of acute-phase markers tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum amyloid A (SAA), at all sampling times in all patients.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in preoperative variables. Baseline levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-10, CRP, and SAA were comparable in both groups. An increase was noted in TNF-alpha, IL-6, CRP, and SAA after surgery but no significant differences were assessed between MPCNL and PCNL during the entire period. IL-10 did not change at the different sampling times.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data fail to demonstrate significant advantages of MPCNL in terms of reduced surgical trauma and associated invasiveness compared with standard PCNL based on the variables objectively measured in this study. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19800671     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  20 in total

1.  A prospective comparative study of haemodynamic, electrolyte, and metabolic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Shuxiong Xu; Hua Shi; Jianguo Zhu; Yuanlin Wang; Ying Cao; Kai Li; Yandong Wang; Zhaolin Sun; Shujie Xia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Prevention and treatment of septic shock following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center retrospective study of 834 cases.

Authors:  Chunlai Liu; Xiling Zhang; Yili Liu; Ping Wang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Minituriazed percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what does it mean?

Authors:  W Kamal; P Kallidonis; I Kyriazis; E Liatsikos
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10-30 mm size.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Jan Peter Jessen; Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Super-, perfect-, ultra-, micro-, mini-, …: does anybody benefit from miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Thomas Knoll
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Research progress of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Chao Wei; Yucong Zhang; Gaurab Pokhrel; Xiaming Liu; Jiahua Gan; Xiao Yu; Zhangqun Ye; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Predictive factors of stone-free rate and complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy under local infiltration anesthesia.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Kai Xu; Bingkun Li; Shusheng Wang; Songtao Xiang; Hulin Li
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience.

Authors:  Ahmed Sakr; Emad Salem; Mostafa Kamel; Esam Desoky; Ahmed Ragab; Mohamed Omran; Amr Fawzi; Ashraf Shahin
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.

Authors:  Xiao-Jian Gu; Jian Lin Lu; Yan Xu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Zhu; Yang Liu; Luhao Liu; Ming Lei; Jian Yuan; Shaw P Wan; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.