BACKGROUND: We investigated whether taking into account IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody concentration (IgA anti-tTG) and total IgA concentration could improve clinical interpretation of serologic testing for celiac disease (CD). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 43 consecutive newly diagnosed CD patients and 545 consecutive disease control patients who had an IgA anti-tTG request during the 42-month study period and for whom intestinal biopsy results were available. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of the IgA anti-tTG assay from Genesis was 95.3% and 92.7%, respectively, with a likelihood ratio (LR) of 12.4. The LR for CD markedly increased with increasing IgA anti-tTG concentration (from 2.0 for results between 7 and 20 U/ml up to 319 for results >100 U/ml). The LR for CD was also higher in patients with a normal IgA concentration (0.82-4.53 g/L) compared to patients with an increased IgA concentration (15.3 vs. 3.1, respectively). These observations were confirmed with a second IgA anti-tTG assay from BioRad. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity of IgA anti-tTG was good. Specificity, however, was reduced when IgA anti-tTG was weak positive or when the IgA concentration was increased. Taking into account IgA anti-tTG concentration and IgA concentration improves clinical interpretation of serologic testing for CD.
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether taking into account IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody concentration (IgA anti-tTG) and total IgA concentration could improve clinical interpretation of serologic testing for celiac disease (CD). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 43 consecutive newly diagnosed CDpatients and 545 consecutive disease control patients who had an IgA anti-tTG request during the 42-month study period and for whom intestinal biopsy results were available. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of the IgA anti-tTG assay from Genesis was 95.3% and 92.7%, respectively, with a likelihood ratio (LR) of 12.4. The LR for CD markedly increased with increasing IgA anti-tTG concentration (from 2.0 for results between 7 and 20 U/ml up to 319 for results >100 U/ml). The LR for CD was also higher in patients with a normal IgA concentration (0.82-4.53 g/L) compared to patients with an increased IgA concentration (15.3 vs. 3.1, respectively). These observations were confirmed with a second IgA anti-tTG assay from BioRad. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity of IgA anti-tTG was good. Specificity, however, was reduced when IgA anti-tTG was weak positive or when the IgA concentration was increased. Taking into account IgA anti-tTG concentration and IgA concentration improves clinical interpretation of serologic testing for CD.
Authors: Isabel A Hujoel; Claire L Jansson-Knodell; Philippe P Hujoel; Margaux L A Hujoel; Rok Seon Choung; Joseph A Murray; Alberto Rubio-Tapia Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 3.174
Authors: Ning Wang; Lennart Truedsson; Kerstin Elvin; Bengt A Andersson; Johan Rönnelid; Lucia Mincheva-Nilsson; Annica Lindkvist; Jonas F Ludvigsson; Lennart Hammarström; Charlotte Dahle Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 3.240