Literature DB >> 19799756

Patency rates for angioplasty in the treatment of pacemaker-induced central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients: results of a multi-center study.

Arif Asif1, Loay Salman, Roger G Carrillo, Juan D Garisto, Gustavo Lopera, Urwa Barakat, Oliver Lenz, Alexander Yevzlin, Anil Agarwal, Florin Gadalean, Bharat Sachdeva, Tushar J Vachharajani, Steven Wu, Ivan D Maya, Ken Abreo.   

Abstract

While hemodialysis access ligation has been used to manage pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead-induced central venous stenosis (CVS), percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) has also been employed to manage this complication. The advantages of PTA include minimal invasiveness and preservation of arteriovenous access for hemodialysis therapy. In this multi-center study we report the patency rates for PTA to manage lead-induced CVS. Consecutive PM/ICD chronic hemodialysis patients with an arteriovenous access referred for signs and symptoms of CVS due to lead-induced CVS were included in this analysis. PTA was performed using the standard technique. Technical and clinical success was examined. Technical success was defined as the ability to successfully perform the procedure. Clinical success was defined as the ability to achieve amelioration of the signs and symptoms of CVS. Both primary and secondary patency rates were also analyzed. Twenty-eight consecutive patients underwent PTA procedure. Technical success was 95%. Postprocedure clinical success was achieved in 100% of the cases where the procedure was successful. The primary patency rates were 18% and 9% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The secondary patency rates were 95%, 86%, and 73% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. On average, 2.1 procedures/year were required to maintain secondary patency. There were no procedure-related complications. This study finds PTA to be a viable option in the management of PM/ICD lead-induced CVS. Additional studies with appropriate design and sample size are required to conclusively establish the role of PTA in the management of this problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19799756     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00636.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Dial        ISSN: 0894-0959            Impact factor:   3.455


  10 in total

1.  Pulsatile tinnitus as a presenting symptom of central venous stenosis secondary to an ipsilateral upper arm arteriovenous PTFE graft.

Authors:  Lloyd Steele; David Flowers; Simon Coles; Paul Gibbs
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-07-26

Review 2.  The Role of Endovascular Stents in Dialysis Access Maintenance.

Authors:  Mohamad El Kassem; Issam Alghamdi; Roberto I Vazquez-Padron; Arif Asif; Oliver Lenz; Tina Sanjar; Fadi Fayad; Loay Salman
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.620

3.  The feasibility and safety of a through-and-through wire technique for central venous occlusion in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Yonghui Huang; Bing Chen; Guosheng Tan; Gang Cheng; Yi Zhang; Jiaping Li; Jianyong Yang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Application of Hong's technique for removal of stuck hemodialysis tunneled catheter to pacemaker leads.

Authors:  Chaudhry Adeel Ebad; Stephen Davitt; Ramal Gnanasekaran; Amjad Khan; Anne-Marie Moran
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-30

5.  Successful upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy for cardiac implantation-associated left subclavian vein occlusion: A case report.

Authors:  Jin-Yan Zhong; Xiao-Wei Zheng; Heng-Dong Li; Long-Fu Jiang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Lead-associated Superior Vena Cava Syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew H Locke; David J Shim; Jessica Burr; Tyler Mehegan; Kelsey Murphy; André D'Avila; Marc L Schermerhorn; Peter Zimetbaum
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2021-04-15

7.  Development of Central Venous Stenosis Upon ICD Implantation in Dialysis Patients: A Non-Negligible Issue.

Authors:  Rohit J Timal; Ioannis Karalis; Jose M Montero Cabezas; Joris I Rotmans; Liselotte C R Hensen; Maurits S Buiten; Mihaly K de Bie; Lieselot van Erven; Hein Putter; Martin J Schalij; Ton J Rabelink; J Wouter Jukema
Journal:  Cardiol Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-14

8.  Endovascular interventions for central vein stenosis.

Authors:  Anil K Agarwal
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2015-11-12

9.  Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study.

Authors:  Seonjeong Jeong; Gi Byoung Nam; Jai Won Chang; Min-Ju Kim; Youngjin Han; Tae-Won Kwon; Yong-Pil Cho
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Device Placement: Results of a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Mohammad A Hossain; Firas Ajam; Hetavi Mahida; Anas Alrefaee; Swapnil Patel; Khushboo Agarwal; Marjan Alidoost; Shereen Dahab; Amy Quinlan; Michael Orange; Arman Mushtaq; Arif Asif
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2020-03-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.