Literature DB >> 19798555

A balancing act--telehealth cancer genetics and practitioners' experiences of a triadic consultation.

Elvira Zilliacus1, Bettina Meiser, Elizabeth Lobb, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Katherine Tucker.   

Abstract

Telehealth is increasingly used for outreach service in cancer genetic counseling; however what occurs during the consultation and the roles practitioners adopt is largely unknown. Fifteen practitioners participated in semi-structured interviews that explored their roles within telehealth, compared to face-to-face consultations, and the relationship between practitioners during telehealth. As they were not physically present with the patient, most participants felt that telehealth altered the genetic clinician's role to one of a 'visiting specialist'. Genetic counselors described undertaking multiple roles during the telehealth process. Two models of interaction were observed. The medical model reduced the interaction to a dyadic consultation by having the genetic counselor off-screen and included minimal clinician meetings and supervision. The triadic co-facilitation model incorporated a high level of information exchange, counselor autonomy and included the counselor onscreen. The co-facilitation model offers a useful framework for telehealth genetic counselling, offering complementary roles between practitioners and efficient service delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19798555     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9247-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  10 in total

1.  Physician acceptance of telemedicine technology: an empirical investigation.

Authors:  P J Hu; P Y Chau
Journal:  Top Health Inf Manage       Date:  1999-05

2.  Nurse-doctor interaction in teleconsultations between a hospital and a geriatric nursing home.

Authors:  Stefan Sävenstedt; Gösta Bucht; Lennart Norberg; P O Sandman
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.184

Review 3.  Communication in context: new directions in communication research.

Authors:  Jozien Bensing; Sandra van Dulmen; Kiek Tates
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-05

4.  What do physicians think of telemedicine? A survey in different European regions.

Authors:  T Mairinger; C Gabl; P Derwan; G Mikuz; O Ferrer-Roca
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 6.184

5.  Psychological Aspects of Genetic Counseling. IX. Teaching and Counseling.

Authors:  S Kessler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Patient-nurse-doctor interaction in general practice teleconsultations--a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Martina A Torppa; Olavi Timonen; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Pekka Larivaara; Mikael Leiman
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.184

7.  Telemedicine and clinical genetics: establishing a successful service.

Authors:  M R Gattas; J C MacMillan; I Meinecke; M Loane; R Wootton
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.184

8.  Children's contributions to pediatric outpatient encounters.

Authors:  A M van Dulmen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Doctor-parent-child relationships: a 'pas de trois'.

Authors:  Kiek Tates; Ed Elbers; Ludwien Meeuwesen; Jozien Bensing
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-09
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Telegenetics use in presymptomatic genetic counselling: patient evaluations on satisfaction and quality of care.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Genetic Counselors' Experiences and Interest in Telegenetics and Remote Counseling.

Authors:  Heather A Zierhut; Ian M MacFarlane; Zahra Ahmed; Jill Davies
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Online genetic counseling from the providers' perspective: counselors' evaluations and a time and cost analysis.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Trends in telehealth versus on-site clinical genetics appointments in Manitoba: a comparative study.

Authors:  Alison M Elliott; Aizeddin A Mhanni; Sandra L Marles; Cheryl R Greenberg; Albert E Chudley; Gwendolyne C Nyhof; Bernard N Chodirker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Women's experience of telehealth cancer genetic counseling.

Authors:  Elvira M Zilliacus; Bettina Meiser; Elizabeth A Lobb; Judy Kirk; Linda Warwick; Katherine Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  IMPACT webinars: Improving Patient Access to genetic Counselling and Testing using webinars-the Alberta experience with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Susan Christian; Julia Tagoe; Lenore Delday; Francois P Bernier; Ruth Kohut; Raechel Ferrier
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-11-11

7.  Sudden shift to remote genetic counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of genetics professionals in Italy.

Authors:  Daniela Turchetti; Linda Battistuzzi; Benedetta Bertonazzi; Lea Godino
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 2.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.