Literature DB >> 19798520

Biomonitoring of oral epithelial cells in smokers and non-smokers submitted to panoramic X-ray: comparison between buccal mucosa and lateral border of the tongue.

Fernanda Angelieri1, Tatiana de Cássia Gonçalves Moleirinho, Viviane Carlin, Celina Tizuko Fujiyama Oshima, Daniel Araki Ribeiro.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate DNA damage (micronucleus) and cellular death (pyknosis, karyolysis, and karyorrhexis) in exfoliated oral mucosa cells from smokers and non-smokers submitted to dental X-ray using two anatomic sites: buccal mucosa and lateral border of the tongue. A total of 15 heavy smokers and 17 non-smokers were submitted to panoramic dental radiography for orthodontic reasons. Individuals had epithelial cells from cheek and lateral border of the tongue mechanically exfoliated, placed in fixative, and dropped in clean slides which were checked for the above nuclear phenotypes. The results pointed out no significant statistically differences (p >  0.05) of micronucleated oral mucosa cells before versus after X-ray exposure for both oral sites evaluated either to smokers or to non-smokers. X-ray exposure was able to increase other nuclear alterations closely related to cytotoxicity such as karrhyorexis, pyknosis, and karyolysis for two groups evaluated. Nevertheless, the most pronunciated effects were found to lateral border of the tongue of smokers. In summary, these data indicate that panoramic X-ray is able to induce cellular death in oral mucosa cells. It seems that lateral border of the tongue is more sensitive site to cytotoxic insult induced by ionizing radiation combined with continuous cigarette smoke exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19798520     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0345-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  30 in total

1.  Genetic damage in exfoliated cells from oral mucosa of individuals exposed to X-rays during panoramic dental radiographies.

Authors:  E M M Cerqueira; I S Gomes-Filho; S Trindade; M A Lopes; J S Passos; G M Machado-Santelli
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-08-08       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Effect of staining procedures on the results of micronucleus assays with exfoliated oral mucosa cells.

Authors:  Armen Nersesyan; Michael Kundi; Kambis Atefie; Rolf Schulte-Hermann; Siegfried Knasmüller
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Study of DNA damage induction and repair capacity of fresh and cryopreserved lymphocytes exposed to H2O2 and gamma-irradiation with the alkaline comet assay.

Authors:  E E Visvardis; A M Tassiou; S M Piperakis
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1997-01-31       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  The buccal cytome and micronucleus frequency is substantially altered in Down's syndrome and normal ageing compared to young healthy controls.

Authors:  Philip Thomas; Sarah Harvey; Tini Gruner; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Nicotine affects the signaling of the death pathway, reducing the response of head and neck cancer cell lines to DNA damaging agents.

Authors:  N Onoda; A Nehmi; D Weiner; S Mujumdar; R Christen; G Los
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 6.  Molecular epidemiology: cancer risk assessment using biomarkers for detecting early health effects in individuals exposed to occupational and environmental carcinogens.

Authors:  J A Indulski; W Lutz
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.458

Review 7.  The HUman MicroNucleus Project--An international collaborative study on the use of the micronucleus technique for measuring DNA damage in humans.

Authors:  M Fenech; N Holland; W P Chang; E Zeiger; S Bonassi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Cytogenetic biomonitoring in patients exposed to dental X-rays: comparison between adults and children.

Authors:  D A Ribeiro; G de Oliveira; Gm de Castro; F Angelieri
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Tobacco smoking and cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara Gandini; Edoardo Botteri; Simona Iodice; Mathieu Boniol; Albert B Lowenfels; Patrick Maisonneuve; Peter Boyle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Localized formation of micronuclei in the oral mucosa and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in the saliva of "reverse" smokers, Khaini-tobacco chewers and gudakhu users.

Authors:  H F Stich; B B Parida; K D Brunnemann
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1992-01-21       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Cytogenetic biomonitoring in oral mucosa cells following dental X-ray.

Authors:  D A Ribeiro
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Re: Does smoking habit increase the micronuclei frequency in the oral mucosa of adults compared to non-smokers? A systematic review and meta-analysis. de Geus et al., Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jan; 22(1):81-91.

Authors:  Armen Nersesyan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Cytogenetic biomonitoring of oral mucosa cells of crack cocaine users.

Authors:  Maria das Graças Alonso de Oliveira; Jean Nunes Dos Santos; Patrícia Ramos Cury; Victor Hugo Pereira da Silva; Nara Rejane Cruz Oliveira; Ricardo da Costa Padovani; Adriana Marcassa Tucci; Daniel Araki Ribeiro
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Does smoking habit increase the micronuclei frequency in the oral mucosa of adults compared to non-smokers? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juliana Larocca de Geus; Letícia Maíra Wambier; Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi; Alessandro D Loguercio; Stella Kossatz; Alessandra Reis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Cytogenetic biomonitoring in children submitting to a complete set of radiographs for orthodontic planning.

Authors:  Diego Coelho Lorenzoni; Ana Carolina Cuzzuol Fracalossi; Viviane Carlin; Daniel Araki Ribeiro; Eduardo Franzotti Sant' Anna
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Mutagenicity and cytotoxicity in patients submitted to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Diego Coelho Lorenzoni; Ana Carolina Cuzzuol Fracalossi; Viviane Carlin; Daniel Araki Ribeiro; Eduardo Franzotti Sant'anna
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Buccal mucosa micronuclei counts in relation to exposure to low dose-rate radiation from the Chornobyl nuclear accident and other medical and occupational radiation exposures.

Authors:  D Bazyka; S C Finch; I M Ilienko; O Lyaskivska; I Dyagil; N Trotsiuk; N Gudzenko; V V Chumak; K M Walsh; J Wiemels; M P Little; L B Zablotska
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 8.  Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?

Authors:  Niels Belmans; Anne Caroline Oenning; Benjamin Salmon; Bjorn Baselet; Kevin Tabury; Stéphane Lucas; Ivo Lambrichts; Marjan Moreels; Reinhilde Jacobs; Sarah Baatout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Genotoxic effects of X-rays in buccal mucosal cells in children subjected to dental radiographs.

Authors:  Naveena Preethi; Nagarathna Chikkanarasaiah; Shakuntala S Bethur
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2016-03-25

10.  GENOTOXICITY AND CYTOTOXICITY OF X-RAYS IN CHILDREN EXPOSED TO PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY.

Authors:  Evelyn Louise Antonio; Aguinaldo José do Nascimento; Antonio Adilson Soares de Lima; Maria Suely Soares Leonart; Ângela Fernandes
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.