Literature DB >> 19797612

Sensitive detection of KRAS mutations in archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue using mutant-enriched PCR and reverse-hybridization.

Christoph Ausch1, Veronika Buxhofer-Ausch, Christian Oberkanins, Barbara Holzer, Michael Minai-Pour, Stephan Jahn, Nadia Dandachi, Robert Zeillinger, Gernot Kriegshäuser.   

Abstract

Recently, evidence has emerged indicating that assessment of KRAS mutations before anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy improves outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We report here a novel reverse-hybridization (RH) assay to screen for KRAS mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded colorectal tissue samples. We combined mutant-enriched PCR based on peptide nucleic acid clamping and RH of amplification products to nitrocellulose test strips that contained a parallel array of oligonucleotide probes targeting 10 frequent mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS gene. DNA mixing experiments, which included eight different tumor cell lines with known KRAS mutations, were performed to examine the sensitivity of mutation detection. All KRAS mutations present in tumor cell lines were unambiguously identified by the RH assay with 1% of each cell line DNA diluted in normal DNA. RH was then used to screen for KRAS mutations in 74 colorectal tumor and 4 normal control samples. Twenty-six (35%) of the 74 tumor samples showed KRAS mutations. No mutation was found in the four samples of normal colorectal tissue. DNA sequencing without previous mutant enrichment, however, failed to detect four (15%) out of 26 KRAS-positive formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (FFPE). This finding suggests that even after microdissection, mutant sequences in a given DNA isolate can be rare and more sensitive methods are needed for mutation analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19797612      PMCID: PMC2765748          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.090022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  22 in total

Review 1.  Epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in cancer.

Authors:  John Mendelsohn; Jose Baselga
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  Detection of infrequent and multiple K-ras mutations in human tumors and tumor-adjacent tissues.

Authors:  P Keohavong; D Zhu; T L Whiteside; P Swalsky; A Bakker; E M Elder; J M Siegfried; S Srivastava; S D Finkelstein
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Sensitive sequencing method for KRAS mutation detection by Pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Takako Kawasaki; Mohan Brahmandam; Liying Yan; Mami Cantor; Chungdak Namgyal; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Gregory Y Lauwers; Massimo Loda; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 4.  ras genes.

Authors:  M Barbacid
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 5.  Prognostic and predictive factors in colorectal cancer: Kirsten Ras in CRC (RASCAL) and TP53CRC collaborative studies.

Authors:  A Russo; V Bazan; V Agnese; V Rodolico; N Gebbia
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 6.  ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors.

Authors:  Nancy E Hynes; Heidi A Lane
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  The MAPK signalling pathways and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jing Yuan Fang; Bruce C Richardson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  High sensitivity scanning of colorectal tumors and matched plasma DNA for mutations in APC, TP53, K-RAS, and BRAF genes with a novel DHPLC fluorescence detection platform.

Authors:  S L Lilleberg; J Durocher; C Sanders; K Walters; K Culver
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Genetic analysis is consistent with the hypothesis that NF1 limits myeloid cell growth through p21ras.

Authors:  R Kalra; D C Paderanga; K Olson; K M Shannon
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  K-ras gene mutations in adenomas and carcinomas of the colon.

Authors:  I S Boughdady; A R Kinsella; N Y Haboubi; P F Schofield
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.279

View more
  13 in total

1.  No evidence for interference of h&e staining in DNA testing: usefulness of DNA extraction from H&E-stained archival tissue sections.

Authors:  Teppei Morikawa; Kaori Shima; Aya Kuchiba; Mai Yamauchi; Noriko Tanaka; Yu Imamura; Xiaoyun Liao; Zhi Rong Qian; Mohan Brahmandam; Janina A Longtine; Neal I Lindeman; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  SNaPshot and StripAssay as valuable alternatives to direct sequencing for KRAS mutation detection in colon cancer routine diagnostics.

Authors:  Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta; Elna Moerland; Hanneke de Bruyne; Henk de Graaf; Tamara Vrancken; Gesina van Lijnschoten; Adriaan J C van den Brule
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  KRAS assay selection: sensitivity and accuracy in clinical application.

Authors:  Marta Herreros-Villanueva; Gaurav Aggarwal
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 4.  KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cong Tan; Xiang Du
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Study of KRAS new predictive marker in a clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Inmaculada Bando; Lourdes Cillero; Julián Sanz-Ortega; Patricia Llovet; Paula Pescador; Milagros Ferrer; Miguel de la Hoya; Javier Sastre; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio García; Trinidad Caldés
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  KRAS Testing: A Tool for the Implementation of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Rodney E Shackelford; Nicholas A Whitling; Patricia McNab; Shanker Japa; Domenico Coppola
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2012-07

7.  Feasibility study for ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) on diagnostic prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Ulf Titze; Torsten Hansen; Barbara Titze; Birte Schulz; Alfons Gunnemann; Bernardo Rocco; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

8.  Identification of high-confidence somatic mutations in whole genome sequence of formalin-fixed breast cancer specimens.

Authors:  Shawn E Yost; Erin N Smith; Richard B Schwab; Lei Bao; HyunChul Jung; Xiaoyun Wang; Emile Voest; John P Pierce; Karen Messer; Barbara A Parker; Olivier Harismendy; Kelly A Frazer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  KRAS mutation detection in paired frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) colorectal cancer tissues.

Authors:  Jérome Solassol; Jeanne Ramos; Evelyne Crapez; Majda Saifi; Alain Mangé; Evelyne Vianès; Pierre-Jean Lamy; Valérie Costes; Thierry Maudelonde
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Robust gene expression and mutation analyses of RNA-sequencing of formalin-fixed diagnostic tumor samples.

Authors:  Stefan Graw; Richard Meier; Kay Minn; Clark Bloomer; Andrew K Godwin; Brooke Fridley; Anda Vlad; Peter Beyerlein; Jeremy Chien
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.