Literature DB >> 29383451

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: What Is the Best Strategy to Start and Monitor Treatment Outside Academic Centers?

Carolina Pavlovsky1, Maria Jose Mela Osorio2.   

Abstract

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has dramatically changed the outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Over the last decade, imatinib positioned itself as the gold standard of care, until second-generation TKIs were introduced as first-line treatment. Multiple therapeutic options available today in CML make the decision of the first-line therapy a difficult choice. However, a gap still exists, in the management of CML outside academic centers. Important advances in molecular monitoring have been developed worldwide; nevertheless, monitoring in the "real world" continues to be a challenge in part because international scale (IS) standardized laboratories are not available worldwide, and also because physicians still have some resource barriers and lack of familiarity restricting guideline adoption and consider optimal molecular monitoring a challenge. This review addresses CML first-line treatment, monitoring aspects and giving practical advice, identifying prognostic factors, and guiding management of CML for non-academic centers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCR-ABL; Chronic myeloid leukemia; Monitoring; Non-academic centers; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29383451     DOI: 10.1007/s11912-018-0653-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.075


  32 in total

1.  Prognosis for patients with CML and >10% BCR-ABL1 after 3 months of imatinib depends on the rate of BCR-ABL1 decline.

Authors:  Susan Branford; David T Yeung; Wendy T Parker; Nicola D Roberts; Leanne Purins; Jodi A Braley; Haley K Altamura; Alexandra L Yeoman; Jasmina Georgievski; Bronte A Jamison; Stuart Phillis; Zoe Donaldson; Mary Leong; Linda Fletcher; John F Seymour; Andrew P Grigg; David M Ross; Timothy P Hughes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  How I determine if and when to recommend stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment for chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  David M Ross; Timothy P Hughes
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Cardiologist's perspective to the European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  C Constance; L Trudeau; E M Jolicoeur; D Langleben; A Rivard; R Chehayeb; M-A Côté; D Delgado
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Early molecular and cytogenetic response is predictive for long-term progression-free and overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

Authors:  B Hanfstein; M C Müller; R Hehlmann; P Erben; M Lauseker; A Fabarius; S Schnittger; C Haferlach; G Göhring; U Proetel; H-J Kolb; S W Krause; W-K Hofmann; J Schubert; H Einsele; J Dengler; M Hänel; C Falge; L Kanz; A Neubauer; M Kneba; F Stegelmann; M Pfreundschuh; C F Waller; S Branford; T P Hughes; K Spiekermann; G M Baerlocher; M Pfirrmann; J Hasford; S Saußele; A Hochhaus
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Monitoring chronic myeloid leukaemia therapy by real-time quantitative PCR in blood is a reliable alternative to bone marrow cytogenetics.

Authors:  S Branford; T P Hughes; Z Rudzki
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 6.  Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results.

Authors:  Timothy Hughes; Michael Deininger; Andreas Hochhaus; Susan Branford; Jerald Radich; Jaspal Kaeda; Michele Baccarani; Jorge Cortes; Nicholas C P Cross; Brian J Druker; Jean Gabert; David Grimwade; Rüdiger Hehlmann; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Jeffrey H Lipton; Janina Longtine; Giovanni Martinelli; Giuseppe Saglio; Simona Soverini; Wendy Stock; John M Goldman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Frequency of major molecular responses to imatinib or interferon alfa plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Tim P Hughes; Jaspal Kaeda; Susan Branford; Zbigniew Rudzki; Andreas Hochhaus; Martee L Hensley; Insa Gathmann; Ann E Bolton; Iris C van Hoomissen; John M Goldman; Jerald P Radich
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Association between regular molecular monitoring and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy adherence in chronic myelogenous leukemia in the chronic phase.

Authors:  Annie Guérin; Lei Chen; Katherine Dea; Eric Q Wu; Stuart L Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.580

9.  Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Giuseppe Saglio; Dong-Wook Kim; Surapol Issaragrisil; Philipp le Coutre; Gabriel Etienne; Clarisse Lobo; Ricardo Pasquini; Richard E Clark; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy P Hughes; Neil Gallagher; Albert Hoenekopp; Mei Dong; Ariful Haque; Richard A Larson; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Nilotinib as front-line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase.

Authors:  Jorge E Cortes; Dan Jones; Susan O'Brien; Elias Jabbour; Marina Konopleva; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Tapan Kadia; Gautam Borthakur; Denise Stigliano; Jianqin Shan; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.