Literature DB >> 19794831

Single-sample discrimination of different schedules' reinforced interresponse times.

Takayuki Tanno1, Alan Silberberg, Takayuki Sakagami.   

Abstract

Food-deprived rats in Experiment 1 responded to one of two tandem schedules that were, with equal probability, associated with a sample lever. The tandem schedules' initial links were different random-interval schedules. Their values were adjusted to approximate equality in time to completing each tandem schedule's response requirements. The tandem schedules differed in their terminal links: One reinforced short interresponse times; the other reinforced long ones. Tandem-schedule completion presented two comparison levers, one of which was associated with each tandem schedule. Pressing the lever associated with the sample-lever tandem schedule produced a food pellet. Pressing the other produced a blackout. The difference between terminal-link reinforced interresponse times varied across 10-trial blocks within a session. Conditional-discrimination accuracy increased with the size of the temporal difference between terminal-link reinforced interresponse times. In Experiment 2, one tandem schedule was replaced by a random ratio, while the comparison schedule was either a tandem schedule that only reinforced long interresponse times or a random-interval schedule. Again, conditional-discrimination accuracy increased with the temporal difference between the two schedules' reinforced interresponse times. Most rats mastered the discrimination between random ratio and random interval, showing that the interresponse times reinforced by these schedules can serve to discriminate between these schedules.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interresponse-time reinforcement; lever press; random interval; random ratio; rats; variable interval; variable ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19794831      PMCID: PMC2648525          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type.

Authors:  R L Shull; S T Gaynor; J A Grimes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Yoked variable-ratio and variable-interval responding in pigeons.

Authors:  A C Catania; T J Matthews; P J Silverman; R Yohalem
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Maximizing present value: A model to explain why moderate response rates obtain on variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  A Silberberg; F R Warren-Boulton; T Asano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Optimization and the matching law as accounts of instrumental behavior.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On the primacy of molecular processes in determining response rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Schedule discrimination in a mixed schedule: implications for models of the variable-ratio, variable-interval rate difference.

Authors:  Alan Silberberg; Kazuhiro Goto; Yosuke Hachiga; Takayuki Tanno
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  The local organization of behavior: discrimination of and memory for simple behavioral patterns.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Discrimination of variable schedules is controlled by interresponse times proximal to reinforcement.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.