UNLABELLED: Adult PET/CT acquisition protocols need to be modified for pediatric imaging to minimize the radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic utility. We developed pediatric PET/CT acquisition protocols customized to patient weight and estimated the dosimetry and cancer risk of these low-dose protocols to communicate basic imaging risks. METHODS: Protocols were developed for whole-body (18)F-FDG imaging of patients in PET mode with a weight-based injected activity (5.3 MBq/kg) and acquisition times (3-5 min/field of view) and for CT for attenuation correction and localization with a weight-based tube current ranging from 10 to 40 mAs. Patients were categorized on the basis of the Broselow-Luten color-coded weight scale. Dosimetry and radiation-induced cancer risk for the PET and CT acquisition in each category were derived from mean patient sizes and the interpolation of factors from accepted patient models. RESULTS: Whole-body pediatric PET/CT protocols require the customization of PET-acquisition settings and task-specific selection of CT technique. The proposed weight-based protocols result in an approximate effective dose ranging from 8.0 mSv for a 9-kg patient up to 13.5 mSv for a 63-kg patient. The radiation dose from the proposed protocols is 20%-50% (depending on patient weight), the dose from PET/CT protocols that use a fixed CT technique of 120 mAs and 120 kVp. The approximate, conservative estimate of additional lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence for females using the proposed protocols was approximately 3 in 1,000, with a variation of 18% across patient categories. For males, the additional LAR of cancer incidence was approximately 2 in 1,000, with a variation of 16% across categories. CONCLUSION: Low-dose PET/CT protocols for 11 patient weight categories were developed. The proposed protocols offer an initial set of acquisition parameters for pediatric PET/CT. The use of multiple categories allows for the continued refinement of dose-reduction parameters to minimize dose while maintaining image quality across the range of pediatric patient sizes.
UNLABELLED: Adult PET/CT acquisition protocols need to be modified for pediatric imaging to minimize the radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic utility. We developed pediatric PET/CT acquisition protocols customized to patient weight and estimated the dosimetry and cancer risk of these low-dose protocols to communicate basic imaging risks. METHODS: Protocols were developed for whole-body (18)F-FDG imaging of patients in PET mode with a weight-based injected activity (5.3 MBq/kg) and acquisition times (3-5 min/field of view) and for CT for attenuation correction and localization with a weight-based tube current ranging from 10 to 40 mAs. Patients were categorized on the basis of the Broselow-Luten color-coded weight scale. Dosimetry and radiation-induced cancer risk for the PET and CT acquisition in each category were derived from mean patient sizes and the interpolation of factors from accepted patient models. RESULTS: Whole-body pediatric PET/CT protocols require the customization of PET-acquisition settings and task-specific selection of CT technique. The proposed weight-based protocols result in an approximate effective dose ranging from 8.0 mSv for a 9-kg patient up to 13.5 mSv for a 63-kg patient. The radiation dose from the proposed protocols is 20%-50% (depending on patient weight), the dose from PET/CT protocols that use a fixed CT technique of 120 mAs and 120 kVp. The approximate, conservative estimate of additional lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence for females using the proposed protocols was approximately 3 in 1,000, with a variation of 18% across patient categories. For males, the additional LAR of cancer incidence was approximately 2 in 1,000, with a variation of 16% across categories. CONCLUSION: Low-dose PET/CT protocols for 11 patient weight categories were developed. The proposed protocols offer an initial set of acquisition parameters for pediatric PET/CT. The use of multiple categories allows for the continued refinement of dose-reduction parameters to minimize dose while maintaining image quality across the range of pediatric patient sizes.
Authors: George Sgouros; Eric C Frey; Wesley E Bolch; Michael B Wayson; Andres F Abadia; S Ted Treves Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Michael J Gelfand; Susan E Sharp; S Ted Treves; Frederic H Fahey; Marguerite T Parisi; Adam M Alessio Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2010-08-13
Authors: Josefine S Kornerup; Patrik Brodin; Charlotte Birk Christensen; Thomas Björk-Eriksson; Anne Kiil-Berthelsen; Lise Borgwardt; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2014-11-07
Authors: Zvi Bar-Sever; Lorenzo Biassoni; Barry Shulkin; Grace Kong; Michael S Hofman; Egesta Lopci; Irina Manea; Jacek Koziorowski; Rita Castellani; Ariane Boubaker; Bieke Lambert; Thomas Pfluger; Helen Nadel; Susan Sharp; Francesco Giammarile Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sergios Gatidis; Holger Schmidt; Christian la Fougère; Konstantin Nikolaou; Nina F Schwenzer; Jürgen F Schäfer Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 9.236