Literature DB >> 19793173

Outcomes of endoscopic resection of large colorectal neoplasms: an Australian experience.

Muna Salama1, Donald Ormonde, Thai Quach, Hooi Ee, Ian Yusoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic resection of large colorectal neoplasms is increasingly being used as an alternative to surgery. However data on failure rates, safety and long-term outcomes remain limited. The aim of the study was to report short- and long-term outcomes from endoscopic resection of large colorectal neoplasms from a single centre and use a model to predict mortality had surgery been performed.
METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for endoscopic resection of large (> or = 20 mm) colorectal neoplasms from January 2001 to February 2008 were included. Resection details were recorded in a prospectively maintained database. Data was collected on 30-day complication rates, and follow-up colonoscopy findings. The Colorectal-POSSUM score was used to estimate mortality from open surgery.
RESULTS: There were 154 large neoplasms in 140 patients. Mean age was 68 years (range 22-94). Mean neoplasm size was 26 mm (range 20-80 mm, 24 > or = 40 mm). Complete endoscopic removal was achieved in 95% of cases. Twenty patients were referred for surgery (14%). In the endoscopy group, there were no deaths within 30 days. Twelve patients had a complication including two perforations. Endoscopic follow-up data was available in 90% of cases and five patients (4%) were found to have residual adenoma that was treated endoscopically with subsequent clearance. If surgery had been performed, the mean predicted mortality was 2.2% (range 0.5-10%). There were two deaths (10%) in patients who underwent elective surgery within 30 days.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic resection of large colorectal neoplasms is safe and effective even for very large benign neoplasms. When the lesion is endoscopically resectable this should be the preferred treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19793173     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05987.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  5 in total

1.  Recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Guh Jung Seo; Dae Kyung Sohn; Kyung Su Han; Chang Won Hong; Byung Chang Kim; Ji Won Park; Hyo Seong Choi; Hee Jin Chang; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Screening, management and surveillance for the sessile serrated adenomas/polyps.

Authors:  Xiangsheng Fu; Ye Qiu; Yali Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-03-15

3.  Selective tissue elevation by pressure for endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal adenoma: first clinical trial.

Authors:  S Belle; P H Collet; M Szyrach; P Ströbel; S Post; M D Enderle; G Kähler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision for the treatment of large sessile polyps and laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum.

Authors:  Young Mi Hong; Hyung Wook Kim; Su Bum Park; Cheol Woong Choi; Dae Hwan Kang
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-01-31

5.  Frequency of coexistent carcinoma in sessile serrated adenoma/polyps and traditional serrated adenomas removed by endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Saiki; Tsutomu Nishida; Masashi Yamamoto; Shiro Hayashi; Hiromi Shimakoshi; Akiyoshi Shimoda; Takahiro Amano; Aisa Sakamoto; Yuriko Otake; Aya Sugimoto; Kei Takahashi; Kaori Mukai; Tokuhiro Matsubara; Sachiko Nakajima; Koji Fukui; Masami Inada; Katsumi Yamamoto; Ryozo Tokuda; Shiro Adachi
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.