Literature DB >> 19793053

APC or MUTYH mutations account for the majority of clinically well-characterized families with FAP and AFAP phenotype and patients with more than 30 adenomas.

B Filipe1, C Baltazar, C Albuquerque, S Fragoso, P Lage, I Vitoriano, S Mão de Ferro, I Claro, P Rodrigues, P Fidalgo, P Chaves, M Cravo, C Nobre Leitão.   

Abstract

Patients presenting familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP) or multiple colorectal adenomas (MCRAs) phenotype are clinically difficult to distinguish. We aimed to genetically characterize 107 clinically well-characterized patients with FAP-like phenotype, and stratified according to the recent guidelines for the clinical management of FAP: FAP, AFAP, MCRA (10-99 colorectal adenomas) without family history of colorectal cancer or few adenomas (FH), MCRA (10-99) with FH, MCRA (3-9) with FH. Overall, APC or MUTYH mutations were detected in 42/48 (88%), 14/20 (70%) and 10/38 (26%) of FAP, AFAP and MCRA patients, respectively. APC and MUTYH mutations accounted for 81% and 7% of FAP patients and for 30% and 40% of AFAP patients, respectively. Notably, MCRA patients did not present APC mutations. In 26% of these patients, an MUTYH mutation was identified and the detection rate increased with the number of adenomas, irrespectively of family history, being significantly higher in MCRA patients presenting more than 30 adenomas [7/12 (58%) vs 2/14 (14%), p = 0.023]. We validate the recently proposed guidelines in our patient's cohort and show that APC or MUTYH germline defects are responsible for the majority of clinically well-characterized patients with FAP and AFAP phenotype, and patients with more than 30 colorectal adenomas. The different mutation frequencies according to family history and to the number of adenomas underscore the importance of an adequate familial characterization, both clinically and by colonoscopy, in the management of FAP-like phenotypes. The phenotypes of the mutation-negative patients suggest distinct etiologies in these cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19793053     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01241.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  25 in total

1.  Factors affecting the treatment of multiple colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Emanuele D L Urso; Riccardo Nascimbeni; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Marco Agostini; Claudio Casella; Dario Moneghini; Diego Di Lorenzo; Isacco Maretto; Maribel Sullivan; Isabella Mammi; Alessandra Viel; Donato Nitti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Hepatocelluar carcinoma associated with attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mingqing Li; David A Gerber; Mark Koruda; Bert H O'Neil
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 3.  ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Sapna Syngal; Randall E Brand; James M Church; Francis M Giardiello; Heather L Hampel; Randall W Burt
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Familial adenomatous polyposis in pediatrics: natural history, emerging surveillance and management protocols, chemopreventive strategies, and areas of ongoing debate.

Authors:  Seth Septer; Caitlin E Lawson; Shrikant Anant; Thomas Attard
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Inherited Polyposis Syndromes.

Authors:  Daniel Herzig; Karin Hardiman; Martin Weiser; Nancy You; Ian Paquette; Daniel L Feingold; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Clinical Characteristics of Multiple Colorectal Adenoma Patients Without Germline APC or MYH Mutations.

Authors:  Alan H Tieu; Daniel Edelstein; Jennifer Axilbund; Katharine E Romans; Lodewijk A Brosens; Elizabeth Wiley; Linda Hylind; Francis M Giardiello
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Type and frequency of MUTYH variants in Italian patients with suspected MAP: a retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Ricci; Sara Miccoli; Daniela Turchetti; Davide Bondavalli; Alessandra Viel; Michele Quaia; Elisa Giacomini; Viviana Gismondi; Lupe Sanchez-Mete; Vittoria Stigliano; Aline Martayan; Filomena Mazzei; Margherita Bignami; Luigina Bonelli; Liliana Varesco
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Attenuated polyposis of the large bowel: a morphologic and molecular approach.

Authors:  Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Monica Pedroni; Luca Roncucci; Federica Domati; Giuseppina Rossi; Giulia Magnani; Annalisa Pezzi; Rossella Fante; Luca Reggiani Bonetti
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Simplifying the detection of MUTYH mutations by high resolution melting analysis.

Authors:  Isabel López-Villar; Rosa Ayala; Jan Wesselink; Juan Diego Morillas; Elena López; José Carlos Marín; José Díaz-Tasende; Sara González; Luis Robles; Joaquín Martínez-López
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP): evidence for the origin of the common European mutations p.Tyr179Cys and p.Gly396Asp by founder events.

Authors:  Stefan Aretz; Rossella Tricarico; Laura Papi; Isabel Spier; Elisa Pin; Sukanya Horpaopan; Emanuela Lucci Cordisco; Monica Pedroni; Dietlinde Stienen; Annamaria Gentile; Anna Panza; Ada Piepoli; Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Waltraut Friedl; Alessandra Viel; Maurizio Genuardi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.