Literature DB >> 19792076

Estimating the sampling error: distribution of transition matrices and functions of transition matrices for given trajectory data.

Philipp Metzner1, Frank Noé, Christof Schütte.   

Abstract

The problem of estimating a Markov transition matrix to statistically describe the dynamics underlying an observed process is frequently found in the physical and economical sciences. However, little attention has been paid to the fact that such an estimation is associated with statistical uncertainty, which depends on the number of observed transitions between metastable states. In turn, this induces uncertainties in any property computed from the transition matrix, such as stationary probabilities, committor probabilities, or eigenvalues. Assessing these uncertainties is essential for testing the reliability of a given observation and also, if possible, to plan further simulations or measurements in such a way that the most serious uncertainties will be reduced with minimal effort. Here, a rigorous statistical method is proposed to approximate the complete statistical distribution of functions of the transition matrix provided that one can identify discrete states such that the transition process between them may be modeled with a memoryless jump process, i.e., Markov dynamics. The method is based on sampling the statistical distribution of Markov transition matrices that is induced by the observed transition events. It allows the constraint of reversibility to be included, which is physically meaningful in many applications. The method is illustrated on molecular dynamics simulations of a hexapeptide that are modeled by a Markov transition process between the metastable states. For this model the distributions and uncertainties of the stationary probabilities of metastable states, the transition matrix elements, the committor probabilities, and the transition matrix eigenvalues are estimated. It is found that the detailed balance constraint can significantly alter the distribution of some observables.

Year:  2009        PMID: 19792076     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  9 in total

1.  Optimized parameter selection reveals trends in Markov state models for protein folding.

Authors:  Brooke E Husic; Robert T McGibbon; Mohammad M Sultan; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Enspara: Modeling molecular ensembles with scalable data structures and parallel computing.

Authors:  J R Porter; M I Zimmerman; G R Bowman
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  A new class of enhanced kinetic sampling methods for building Markov state models.

Authors:  Arti Bhoutekar; Susmita Ghosh; Swati Bhattacharya; Abhijit Chatterjee
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Theoretical restrictions on longest implicit time scales in Markov state models of biomolecular dynamics.

Authors:  Anton V Sinitskiy; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Molecular dynamics simulations of an engineered T4 lysozyme exclude helix to sheet transition, and provide insights into long distance, intra-protein switchable motion.

Authors:  Laurence Biggers; Hadeer Elhabashy; Edward Ackad; Mohammad S Yousef
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Molecular dynamics simulations reveal the conformational dynamics of Arabidopsis thaliana BRI1 and BAK1 receptor-like kinases.

Authors:  Alexander S Moffett; Kyle W Bender; Steven C Huber; Diwakar Shukla
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  StreAM-[Formula: see text]: algorithms for analyzing coarse grained RNA dynamics based on Markov models of connectivity-graphs.

Authors:  Sven Jager; Benjamin Schiller; Philipp Babel; Malte Blumenroth; Thorsten Strufe; Kay Hamacher
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 1.405

8.  SAXS-guided Enhanced Unbiased Sampling for Structure Determination of Proteins and Complexes.

Authors:  Chuankai Zhao; Diwakar Shukla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions Between Alsin DH/PH and Rac1 and Resulting Protein Dynamics.

Authors:  Marco Cannariato; Marcello Miceli; Marco Cavaglià; Marco A Deriu
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.