OBJECTIVE: A mismatch defect between (201)TL and (123)I-BMIPP dual isotope SPECT (d-SPECT) is useful to detect myocardial ischemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, whether mismatched d-SPECT findings reflect actual myocardial ischemia in stable patients with suspected, but unknown ischemic heart disease is unclear. The present study assesses the significance of a d-SPECT mismatch among such patients. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with suspected stable coronary heart disease who had been referred for chest pain, ECG abnormalities or multiple risk factors (66 +/- 11 years old, 34 males) with a d-SPECT mismatch participated in this study. All of them underwent coronary angiography (CAG) to assess coronary artery disease. The entire myocardial area on d-SPECT images was divided into 17 segments, each of which was scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (defect). The d-SPECT mismatch score (MS) was defined as the summed BMIPP defect score (BM-TDS) minus the summed defect score (TL-TDS). The inclusion criterion was MS >or= 1, and the mismatch was defined as true positive if the mismatched area was concordant with the territories supplied by significant coronary stenotic arteries by CAG. RESULTS: Ischemic heart disease was judged by coronary angiography in 31 (63%) patients (IHD group), of which 24 (49.0%) were true positives. Of the remaining 18 (37%) patients without no significant coronary stenosis (non-IHD group), 12 (24%) had some types of organic heart disease. If MS >or= 4 was defined as the threshold for an ischemic positive mismatch, then the sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 63%, respectively. However, mismatch scores did not significantly differ between the groups with true positive-IHD and organic heart disease in non-IHD group (6.6 +/- 4.4 vs. 6.4 +/- 3.7). CONCLUSION: A d-SPECT mismatch score of >or=4 was an appropriate cutoff at which diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in patients who were screened for ischemic heart disease. However, since patients with non-ischemic but organic heart disease can also present with abnormal mismatch findings, coronary angiography or CT might be warranted to differentiate IHD from non-IHD.
OBJECTIVE: A mismatch defect between (201)TL and (123)I-BMIPP dual isotope SPECT (d-SPECT) is useful to detect myocardial ischemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, whether mismatched d-SPECT findings reflect actual myocardial ischemia in stable patients with suspected, but unknown ischemic heart disease is unclear. The present study assesses the significance of a d-SPECT mismatch among such patients. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with suspected stable coronary heart disease who had been referred for chest pain, ECG abnormalities or multiple risk factors (66 +/- 11 years old, 34 males) with a d-SPECT mismatch participated in this study. All of them underwent coronary angiography (CAG) to assess coronary artery disease. The entire myocardial area on d-SPECT images was divided into 17 segments, each of which was scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (defect). The d-SPECT mismatch score (MS) was defined as the summed BMIPP defect score (BM-TDS) minus the summed defect score (TL-TDS). The inclusion criterion was MS >or= 1, and the mismatch was defined as true positive if the mismatched area was concordant with the territories supplied by significant coronary stenotic arteries by CAG. RESULTS:Ischemic heart disease was judged by coronary angiography in 31 (63%) patients (IHD group), of which 24 (49.0%) were true positives. Of the remaining 18 (37%) patients without no significant coronary stenosis (non-IHD group), 12 (24%) had some types of organic heart disease. If MS >or= 4 was defined as the threshold for an ischemic positive mismatch, then the sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 63%, respectively. However, mismatch scores did not significantly differ between the groups with true positive-IHD and organic heart disease in non-IHD group (6.6 +/- 4.4 vs. 6.4 +/- 3.7). CONCLUSION: A d-SPECT mismatch score of >or=4 was an appropriate cutoff at which diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in patients who were screened for ischemic heart disease. However, since patients with non-ischemic but organic heart disease can also present with abnormal mismatch findings, coronary angiography or CT might be warranted to differentiate IHD from non-IHD.