Literature DB >> 19789859

Switching tools: perceptual-motor recalibration to weight changes.

Sandee Scott1, Rob Gray.   

Abstract

In order to effectively switch between tools, an actor must re-calibrate perceptual-motor control appropriately for the new tool's kinetic properties. This study explored changes in perceptual-motor control in response to switching to a tool of a different weight when performing a complex control task with moving objects. In Experiment 1, 30 participants were each randomly assigned to one of three groups in a baseball batting simulation: a standard group that always used the same bat weight (1.08 kg), a Lighter group that switched from the standard bat to a 0.79 kg bat, and a Heavier group that switched from the standard bat to a 1.36 kg bat. For both the Heavier and Lighter groups, temporal swing errors were significantly larger (as compared to the standard group) in the first block of trials following the bat change. Both groups re-calibrated quickly: within 5-10 trials after the bat change there were no significant difference between the groups. Analysis of swing kinematics indicated that the two change groups used different means for re-calibrating perceptual-motor control: the Lighter group altered swing velocity while the Heavier group altered swing onset time. In Experiment 2, when batters switched from a 0.79 kg bat to a 1.08 kg bat, perceptual-motor calibration depended on the recommended bat weight for each participant (Bahill and Freitas in Ann Biomed Eng 23:436-444, 1995): batters with a heavier recommended weight altered swing velocity while batters with a lower recommended weight altered onset time. The strategy used for perceptual-motor recalibration and time required to re-calibrate in a complex motor task is dependent on the action boundaries of the actor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19789859     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2022-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Geometrics and dynamics of a rod determine how it is used for reaching.

Authors:  Raoul M Bongers; Ad W Smitsman; Claire F Michaels
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Attending to the execution of a complex sensorimotor skill: expertise differences, choking, and slumps.

Authors:  Rob Gray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2004-03

4.  Hefting for a maximum distance throw: a smart perceptual mechanism.

Authors:  G P Bingham; R C Schmidt; L D Rosenblum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Effects of focus of attention on baseball batting performance in players of differing skill levels.

Authors:  Brooke Castaneda; Rob Gray
Journal:  J Sport Exerc Psychol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.016

6.  Plasticity in sensory-motor systems.

Authors:  R Held
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.142

7.  Consolidation in human motor memory.

Authors:  T Brashers-Krug; R Shadmehr; E Bizzi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Warm-up with baseball bats of varying moments of inertia: effect on bat velocity and swing pattern.

Authors:  Dan Southard; Levi Groomer
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Visual judgements and misjudgements in cricket, and the art of flight.

Authors:  D Regan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Two methods for recommending bat weights.

Authors:  A T Bahill; M M Freitas
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.