Literature DB >> 19788580

Does subliminal visual perception have an error-monitoring system?

Enea Francesco Pavone1, Carlo Alberto Marzi, Massimo Girelli.   

Abstract

There is substantial evidence that subliminal stimuli, i.e. stimuli that cannot be perceived consciously, may influence visually guided human behaviour. Two important points require further investigation, namely, the neural bases and the functional capability of unconscious stimulus processing. In this study we aimed at studying one specific aspect of the latter question, i.e. whether unconscious vision can feed into an error-monitoring system in much the same way as conscious vision. We therefore tested whether the event-related potential component known as error-related negativity, which represents the electrophysiological correlate of an error-monitoring system, is produced by unconscious errors. We found an error-related negativity not only for errors committed in a discrimination task with visible stimuli but also for those committed with subthreshold stimuli. Moreover, behavioural analysis showed post-error slowing of reaction time for correct responses following unconscious as well as conscious errors. Thus, the present results provide both electrophysiological and behavioural evidence of an error-monitoring system operating even when stimuli cannot access consciousness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19788580     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06908.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  11 in total

1.  Working memory demands modulate cognitive control in the Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Tilo Strobach; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-06

2.  Embodying Others in Immersive Virtual Reality: Electro-Cortical Signatures of Monitoring the Errors in the Actions of an Avatar Seen from a First-Person Perspective.

Authors:  Enea Francesco Pavone; Gaetano Tieri; Giulia Rizza; Emmanuele Tidoni; Luigi Grisoni; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Brain mechanisms underlying automatic and unconscious control of motor action.

Authors:  Kevin D'Ostilio; Gaëtan Garraux
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  Is there any electrophysiological evidence for subliminal error processing?

Authors:  Shani Shalgi; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Is any awareness necessary for an Ne?

Authors:  Shani Shalgi; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Unconsciously triggered conflict adaptation.

Authors:  Simon van Gaal; Victor A F Lamme; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Error-related anterior cingulate cortex activity and the prediction of conscious error awareness.

Authors:  Catherine Orr; Robert Hester
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The role of consciousness in cognitive control and decision making.

Authors:  Simon van Gaal; Floris P de Lange; Michael X Cohen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  The Representation of Objects in Apraxia: From Action Execution to Error Awareness.

Authors:  Loredana Canzano; Michele Scandola; Valeria Gobbetto; Giuseppe Moretto; Daniela D'Imperio; Valentina Moro
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Distinct brain mechanisms for conscious versus subliminal error detection.

Authors:  Lucie Charles; Filip Van Opstal; Sébastien Marti; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.