Literature DB >> 26758821

Embodying Others in Immersive Virtual Reality: Electro-Cortical Signatures of Monitoring the Errors in the Actions of an Avatar Seen from a First-Person Perspective.

Enea Francesco Pavone1, Gaetano Tieri2, Giulia Rizza2, Emmanuele Tidoni2, Luigi Grisoni2, Salvatore Maria Aglioti3.   

Abstract

Brain monitoring of errors in one's own and other's actions is crucial for a variety of processes, ranging from the fine-tuning of motor skill learning to important social functions, such as reading out and anticipating the intentions of others. Here, we combined immersive virtual reality and EEG recording to explore whether embodying the errors of an avatar by seeing it from a first-person perspective may activate the error monitoring system in the brain of an onlooker. We asked healthy participants to observe, from a first- or third-person perspective, an avatar performing a correct or an incorrect reach-to-grasp movement toward one of two virtual mugs placed on a table. At the end of each trial, participants reported verbally how much they embodied the avatar's arm. Ratings were maximal in first-person perspective, indicating that immersive virtual reality can be a powerful tool to induce embodiment of an artificial agent, even through mere visual perception and in the absence of any cross-modal boosting. Observation of erroneous grasping from a first-person perspective enhanced error-related negativity and medial-frontal theta power in the trials where human onlookers embodied the virtual character, hinting at the tight link between early, automatic coding of error detection and sense of embodiment. Error positivity was similar in 1PP and 3PP, suggesting that conscious coding of errors is similar for self and other. Thus, embodiment plays an important role in activating specific components of the action monitoring system when others' errors are coded as if they are one's own errors. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Detecting errors in other's actions is crucial for social functions, such as reading out and anticipating the intentions of others. Using immersive virtual reality and EEG recording, we explored how the brain of an onlooker reacted to the errors of an avatar seen from a first-person perspective. We found that mere observation of erroneous actions enhances electrocortical markers of error detection in the trials where human onlookers embodied the virtual character. Thus, the cerebral system for action monitoring is maximally activated when others' errors are coded as if they are one's own errors. The results have important implications for understanding how the brain can control the external world and thus creating new brain-computer interfaces.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/360268-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAVE system; EEG-ERPs; action error detection; cortical oscillations; electrocortical signatures of embodied errors; immersive virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26758821      PMCID: PMC6602032          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0494-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  68 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Position reconstruction from an ensemble of hippocampal place cells: contribution of theta phase coding.

Authors:  O Jensen; J E Lisman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial.

Authors:  M Falkenstein; J Hoormann; S Christ; J Hohnsbein
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Is the 'error negativity' specific to errors?

Authors:  F Vidal; T Hasbroucq; J Grapperon; M Bonnet
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Anterior cingulate cortex, conflict monitoring, and levels of processing.

Authors:  V van Veen; J D Cohen; M M Botvinick; V A Stenger; C S Carter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum; Shaobo Zhang; Kristopher J Preacher; Derek D Rucker
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-03

7.  Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes.

Authors:  E Başar; C Başar-Eroglu; S Karakaş; M Schürmann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects.

Authors:  T P Jung; S Makeig; M Westerfield; J Townsend; E Courchesne; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  The mechanism of self-recognition in humans.

Authors:  Marc Jeannerod
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Michael G H Coles
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  29 in total

1.  Violation of expectations about movement and goal achievement leads to Sense of Agency reduction.

Authors:  Riccardo Villa; Emmanuele Tidoni; Giuseppina Porciello; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual feedback from a virtual body modulates motor illusion induced by tendon vibration.

Authors:  Gabriele Fusco; Gaetano Tieri; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-10

3.  Predicting the fate of basketball throws: an EEG study on expert action prediction in wheelchair basketball players.

Authors:  D G Özkan; R Pezzetta; Q Moreau; A M Abreu; S M Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Seeing pain and pleasure on self and others: behavioral and psychophysiological reactivity in immersive virtual reality.

Authors:  M Fusaro; G Tieri; S M Aglioti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Freedom to act enhances the sense of agency, while movement and goal-related prediction errors reduce it.

Authors:  Riccardo Villa; Emmanuele Tidoni; Giuseppina Porciello; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-31

6.  Apparent Biological Motion in First and Third Person Perspective.

Authors:  Emmanuele Tidoni; Michele Scandola; Veronica Orvalho; Matteo Candidi
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-09-21

7.  Commentary: Embodying Others in Immersive Virtual Reality: Electro-Cortical Signatures of Monitoring the Errors in the Actions of an Avatar Seen from a First-Person Perspective.

Authors:  Andreas Kalckert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-23

Review 8.  Performance Monitoring Applied to System Supervision.

Authors:  Bertille Somon; Aurélie Campagne; Arnaud Delorme; Bruno Berberian
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Changing your body changes your eating attitudes: embodiment of a slim virtual avatar induces avoidance of high-calorie food.

Authors:  Riccardo Tambone; Giulia Poggio; Maria Pyasik; Dalila Burin; Olga Dal Monte; Selene Schintu; Tommaso Ciorli; Laura Lucà; Maria Vittoria Semino; Fabrizio Doricchi; Lorenzo Pia
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-07-10

10.  The Enactive Approach to Architectural Experience: A Neurophysiological Perspective on Embodiment, Motivation, and Affordances.

Authors:  Andrea Jelić; Gaetano Tieri; Federico De Matteis; Fabio Babiloni; Giovanni Vecchiato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.