Literature DB >> 19786082

An evolutionary perspective on middle ears.

Geoffrey A Manley1.   

Abstract

The traditional view that a tympanic middle ear developed only once, when vertebrates made the transition from fish in water to land-living animals, has been shown to be incorrect. Middle ears with a tympanum connected by one or more ossicles to the cochlea developed very much later in evolutionary history and independently in many amniote vertebrate lineages - most now extinct. The mammalian middle ear is unique but it is not simply an "improved" single-ossicle middle ear. It is a radical and fortuitous new development that owes its origin more to changes in feeding patterns than to hearing. It happened to transmit higher-frequency sounds better than single-ossicle middle ears and enabled the evolution of the high upper-frequency hearing limits of most mammals. Parallel to the development of a tympanic middle ear in therian mammals, the brain increased in size and a secondary palate developed, resulting in the ancestral pressure-gradient middle ear being replaced by a purely pressure system. Sound localization then became almost completely dependent on neural computation and this was the most important factor driving up the upper frequency limits of early mammals. This paper presents an historical perspective on these remarkably simple and yet highly effective structures. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19786082     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  26 in total

1.  Specialization for underwater hearing by the tympanic middle ear of the turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Christian Brandt; Katie L Willis; Christian Bech Christensen; Darlene Ketten; Peggy Edds-Walton; Richard R Fay; Peter T Madsen; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Parameters for novel incus replacement prostheses.

Authors:  Holger Kaftan; Andrea Böhme; Heiner Martin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  The role of foxi family transcription factors in the development of the ear and jaw.

Authors:  Renée K Edlund; Onur Birol; Andrew K Groves
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  The Calyx of Held: A Hypothesis on the Need for Reliable Timing in an Intensity-Difference Encoder.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Laurence O Trussell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Sound localization in the alligator.

Authors:  Hilary S Bierman; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  The paratympanic organ: a barometer and altimeter in the middle ear of birds?

Authors:  Christopher S von Bartheld; Francesco Giannessi
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.656

Review 7.  Comparative Auditory Neuroscience: Understanding the Evolution and Function of Ears.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-18

Review 8.  Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the nucleus laminaris of turtles.

Authors:  Katie L Willis; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Earless toads sense low frequencies but miss the high notes.

Authors:  Molly C Womack; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Luis A Coloma; Juan C Chaparro; Kim L Hoke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.