Literature DB >> 19785041

An economic comparison of different fermentation configurations to convert corn stover to ethanol using Z. mobilis and Saccharomyces.

Abhijit Dutta1, Nancy Dowe, Kelly N Ibsen, Daniel J Schell, Andy Aden.   

Abstract

Numerous routes are being explored to lower the cost of cellulosic ethanol production and enable large-scale production. One critical area is the development of robust cofermentative organisms to convert the multiple, mixed sugars found in biomass feedstocks to ethanol at high yields and titers without the need for processing to remove inhibitors. Until such microorganisms are commercialized, the challenge is to design processes that exploit the current microorganisms' strengths. This study explored various process configurations tailored to take advantage of the specific capabilities of three microorganisms, Z. mobilis 8b, S. cerevisiae, and S. pastorianus. A technoeconomic study, based on bench-scale experimental data generated by integrated process testing, was completed to understand the resulting costs of the different process configurations. The configurations included whole slurry fermentation with a coculture, and separate cellulose simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) and xylose fermentations with none, some or all of the water to the SSF replaced with the fermented liquor from the xylose fermentation. The difference between the highest and lowest ethanol cost for the different experimental process configurations studied was $0.27 per gallon ethanol. Separate fermentation of solid and liquor streams with recycle of fermented liquor to dilute the solids gave the lowest ethanol cost, primarily because this option achieved the highest concentrations of ethanol after fermentation. Further studies, using methods similar to ones employed here, can help understand and improve the performance and hence the economics of integrated processes involving enzymes and fermentative microorganisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19785041     DOI: 10.1002/btpr.311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Prog        ISSN: 1520-6033


  12 in total

1.  N2 gas is an effective fertilizer for bioethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis.

Authors:  Timothy A Kremer; Breah LaSarre; Amanda L Posto; James B McKinlay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Comparative performance of precommercial cellulases hydrolyzing pretreated corn stover.

Authors:  James D McMillan; Edward W Jennings; Ali Mohagheghi; Mildred Zuccarello
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 6.040

3.  Comparison of SHF and SSF of wet exploded corn stover and loblolly pine using in-house enzymes produced from T. reesei RUT C30 and A. saccharolyticus.

Authors:  Vandana Rana; Anahita D Eckard; Birgitte K Ahring
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-09-11

4.  Long-term variability in sugarcane bagasse feedstock compositional methods: sources and magnitude of analytical variability.

Authors:  David W Templeton; Justin B Sluiter; Amie Sluiter; Courtney Payne; David P Crocker; Ling Tao; Ed Wolfrum
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Replacing process water and nitrogen sources with biogas slurry during cellulosic ethanol production.

Authors:  Yang You; Bo Wu; Yi-Wei Yang; Yan-Wei Wang; Song Liu; Qi-Li Zhu; Han Qin; Fu-Rong Tan; Zhi-Yong Ruan; Ke-Dong Ma; Li-Chun Dai; Min Zhang; Guo-Quan Hu; Ming-Xiong He
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Determinants on an efficient cellulase recycling process for the production of bioethanol from recycled paper sludge under high solid loadings.

Authors:  Daniel Gomes; Miguel Gama; Lucília Domingues
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Economic Assessment of Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Waxes as Part of a Maize Stover Biorefinery.

Authors:  Thomas M Attard; Con Robert McElroy; Andrew J Hunt
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Bench-scale bioethanol production from eucalyptus by high solid saccharification and glucose/xylose fermentation method.

Authors:  Tatsuya Fujii; Katsuji Murakami; Takashi Endo; Shinji Fujimoto; Tomoaki Minowa; Akinori Matsushika; Shinichi Yano; Shigeki Sawayama
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Enhancement of total sugar and lignin yields through dissolution of poplar wood by hot water and dilute acid flowthrough pretreatment.

Authors:  Lishi Yan; Libing Zhang; Bin Yang
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  A laboratory-scale pretreatment and hydrolysis assay for determination of reactivity in cellulosic biomass feedstocks.

Authors:  Edward J Wolfrum; Ryan M Ness; Nicholas J Nagle; Darren J Peterson; Christopher J Scarlata
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.