BACKGROUND: Endothelial and leukocytes-derived microparticles (EMPs and LMPs, respectively) are increased in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). We hypothesized that the levels of circulating EMPs and LMPs could predict outcome in these patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing right heart catheterization for untreated pre-capillary PH were eligible for the study. Baseline hemodynamics and biologic and clinical parameters were measured at the time of enrollment. Measurements of CD62e(+), CD144(+) and CD31(+)/CD41(-) EMPs and CD45(+) LMPs were performed using flow cytometry in venous platelet-free plasma samples. After inclusion, patients were treated at the discretion of the physician and prospectively followed for 12 months. The primary end-point was the combined occurrence of death and re-admission for right heart failure (RHF) or worsening of RHF symptoms. RESULTS: Seven of 21 patients (mean age 54.1 +/- 3.5 years, 62% female) experienced the primary end-point during the study period. These patients had higher baseline levels of CD62e(+) EMPs, LMPs and hsCRP (high sensitivity C-reactive protein) compared to patients without events (p < 0.05), whereas no difference was observed for other microparticles and functional and hemodynamics parameters. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that baseline CD62e(+) EMPs levels of >353 events/microl predicted clinical complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with baseline CD62e(+) EMPs above this cut-off value had a significantly worse prognosis compared with those subjects who had levels below this cut-off (p = 0.02, log-rank statistics). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated levels of circulating CD62e(+) EMPs but not LMPs in PH patients prior to treatment are associated with adverse clinical events. Assessment of CD62e(+) EMPs levels may represent a new tool for stratification of PH patients.
BACKGROUND: Endothelial and leukocytes-derived microparticles (EMPs and LMPs, respectively) are increased in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). We hypothesized that the levels of circulating EMPs and LMPs could predict outcome in these patients. METHODS:Patients undergoing right heart catheterization for untreated pre-capillary PH were eligible for the study. Baseline hemodynamics and biologic and clinical parameters were measured at the time of enrollment. Measurements of CD62e(+), CD144(+) and CD31(+)/CD41(-) EMPs and CD45(+) LMPs were performed using flow cytometry in venous platelet-free plasma samples. After inclusion, patients were treated at the discretion of the physician and prospectively followed for 12 months. The primary end-point was the combined occurrence of death and re-admission for right heart failure (RHF) or worsening of RHF symptoms. RESULTS: Seven of 21 patients (mean age 54.1 +/- 3.5 years, 62% female) experienced the primary end-point during the study period. These patients had higher baseline levels of CD62e(+) EMPs, LMPs and hsCRP (high sensitivity C-reactive protein) compared to patients without events (p < 0.05), whereas no difference was observed for other microparticles and functional and hemodynamics parameters. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that baseline CD62e(+) EMPs levels of >353 events/microl predicted clinical complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with baseline CD62e(+) EMPs above this cut-off value had a significantly worse prognosis compared with those subjects who had levels below this cut-off (p = 0.02, log-rank statistics). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated levels of circulating CD62e(+) EMPs but not LMPs in PH patients prior to treatment are associated with adverse clinical events. Assessment of CD62e(+) EMPs levels may represent a new tool for stratification of PH patients.
Authors: Cynthia Gordon; Kirana Gudi; Anja Krause; Rachel Sackrowitz; Ben-Gary Harvey; Yael Strulovici-Barel; Jason G Mezey; Ronald G Crystal Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Daniel Bulut; Michael Scheeler; Lisa Marie Niedballa; Thomas Miebach; Andreas Mügge Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2011-02-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Matthew R Lammi; Lesley Ann Saketkoo; Samuel C Okpechi; Mohamed A Ghonim; Dorota Wyczechowska; Natalie Bauer; Kusma Pyakurel; Saito Saito; Bennett P deBoisblanc; A Hamid Boulares Journal: Respirology Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 6.424
Authors: Ruslan Rafikov; Vineet Nair; Shripad Sinari; Harini Babu; Jennifer C Sullivan; Jason X-J Yuan; Ankit A Desai; Olga Rafikova Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Loren Petrozella; Mala Mahendroo; Brenda Timmons; Scott Roberts; Donald McIntire; James M Alexander Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jason M Aliotta; Mandy Pereira; Ashley Amaral; Arina Sorokina; Zenas Igbinoba; Alexander Hasslinger; Rabih El-Bizri; Sharon I Rounds; Peter J Quesenberry; James R Klinger Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Anne M Curtis; Jay Edelberg; Rebecca Jonas; Wade T Rogers; Jonni S Moore; Wajihuddin Syed; Emile R Mohler Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 3.239