Literature DB >> 19782094

Body schematics: on the role of the body schema in embodied lexical-semantic representations.

Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer1, Christian Pfeiffer, Harold Bekkering.   

Abstract

Words denoting manipulable objects activate sensorimotor brain areas, likely reflecting action experience with the denoted objects. In particular, these sensorimotor lexical representations have been found to reflect the way in which an object is used. In the current paper we present data from two experiments (one behavioral and one neuroimaging) in which we investigate whether body schema information, putatively necessary for interacting with functional objects, is also recruited during lexical processing. To this end, we presented participants with words denoting objects that are typically brought towards or away from the body (e.g., cup or key, respectively). We hypothesized that objects typically brought to a location on the body (e.g., cup) are relatively more reliant on body schema representations, since the final goal location of the cup (i.e., the mouth) is represented primarily through posture and body co-ordinates. In contrast, objects typically brought to a location away from the body (e.g., key) are relatively more dependent on visuo-spatial representations, since the final goal location of the key (i.e., a keyhole) is perceived visually. The behavioral study showed that prior planning of a movement along an axis towards and away from the body facilitates processing of words with a congruent action semantic feature (i.e., preparation of movement towards the body facilitates processing of cup.). In an fMRI study we showed that words denoting objects brought towards the body engage the resources of brain areas involved in the processing information about human bodies (i.e., the extra-striate body area, middle occipital gyrus and inferior parietal lobe) relatively more than words denoting objects typically brought away from the body. The results provide converging evidence that body schema are implicitly activated in processing lexical information. 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19782094     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  14 in total

1.  Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations.

Authors:  Wessel O van Dam; Margriet van Dijk; Harold Bekkering; Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Adaptable Categorization of Hands and Tools in Prosthesis Users.

Authors:  Fiona M Z van den Heiligenberg; Nick Yeung; Peter Brugger; Jody C Culham; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-01-01

3.  Uncovering the architecture of action semantics.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Differentiable cortical networks for inferences concerning people's intentions versus physical causality.

Authors:  Robert A Mason; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Effects of motion speed in action representations.

Authors:  Wessel O van Dam; Laura J Speed; Vicky T Lai; Gabriella Vigliocco; Rutvik H Desai
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Identifying bilingual semantic neural representations across languages.

Authors:  Augusto Buchweitz; Svetlana V Shinkareva; Robert A Mason; Tom M Mitchell; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Supramodal and modality-sensitive representations of perceived action categories in the human brain.

Authors:  Richard Ramsey; Emily S Cross; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Embodied language comprehension requires an enactivist paradigm of cognition.

Authors:  Michiel van Elk; Marc Slors; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-27

9.  Metaphors are Embodied, and so are Their Literal Counterparts.

Authors:  Eduardo Santana; Manuel de Vega
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-10

10.  Context effects in embodied lexical-semantic processing.

Authors:  Wessel O van Dam; Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer; Oliver Lindemann; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.