Literature DB >> 19781410

Design and rationale of the TRI-stent adjudication study (TRIAS) program.

Margo Klomp1, Marcel A M Beijk, Niels J W Verouden, Jan G P Tijssen, Robbert J de Winter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of coronary artery disease, a "pro-healing" approach for prevention of in-stent restenosis and late stent thrombosis is intuitively favored over the use of cytotoxic or cytostatic drugs released from a drug-eluting stent (DES). Promoting accelerated endothelial coverage of the stent surface, the endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) capturing stent has shown its safety and efficacy in the HEALING observational studies; however, randomized trials evaluating the device are lacking.
METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, controlled, 2-armed TRIAS program aims to include a total of 2560 patients. In the TRIAS Low Risk trial, a total of 1300 patients with lesions carrying a low risk of restenosis are randomized between the EPC capturing stent and a bare metal stent, assuming superiority in the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 year. In the TRIAS High Risk trial, 1260 patients with lesions carrying a high risk of restenosis are randomized, assuming the noninferiority in TLF at 1 year of the EPC capturing stent as compared to DES. TLF is defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization. In addition, the duration of clinical follow-up is extended to 5 years to capture late events. Angiographic follow-up at 13 months is performed as part of the TRIAS Program ancillary study. IMPLICATION: The results of the TRIAS Program will provide information on a relevant patient population with coronary artery lesions, comprising the full spectrum of low risk and high risk of restenosis treated with a novel stent technology in a randomized, controlled manner (TRIAS Low Risk trial: ISRCTN 47701105 and TRIAS High Risk trial: ISRCTN 74297220).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19781410     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  5 in total

Review 1.  Restenosis after PCI. Part 2: prevention and therapy.

Authors:  J Wouter Jukema; Tarek A N Ahmed; Jeffrey J W Verschuren; Paul H A Quax
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Applying the National Institute for Clinical Excellence criteria to patients treated with the Genous™ Bio-engineered R stent™: a sub-study of the e-HEALING (Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth) worldwide registry.

Authors:  Margo Klomp; Peter Damman; Marcel A M Beijk; Sigmund Silber; Manfred Grisold; Expedito E Ribeiro; Harry Suryapranata; Jaroslaw Wòjcik; Kui Hian Sim; Jan G P Tijssen; Robbert J de Winter
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  The relationship between the number of preprocedural circulating endothelial progenitor cells and angiographic restenosis following coronary artery stent placement.

Authors:  Margo Klomp; Claudia M van Tiel; Anita M Klous; Marcel A M Beijk; Margriet I Klees; Esther M Scheunhage; Jan G P Tijssen; Carlie J M de Vries; Robbert J de Winter
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2011-01-01

4.  Endothelial progenitor cells: what use for the cardiologist?

Authors:  Aurangzeb Siddique; Eduard Shantsila; Gregory Yh Lip; Chetan Varma
Journal:  J Angiogenes Res       Date:  2010-02-22

Review 5.  Endothelial Progenitor Cells for Ischemic Stroke: Update on Basic Research and Application.

Authors:  Shaohua Liao; Chunxia Luo; Bingzhen Cao; Huaiqiang Hu; Suxia Wang; Huili Yue; Lin Chen; Zhenhua Zhou
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.443

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.