BACKGROUND/AIM: Root surface biomodification has been used to treat gingival recession and periodontitis. The principle for this procedure is that removing the smear layer from the root surfaces exposes collagen fibers, which leads to improved healing. Clinical studies generally have failed to find any improvement in clinical parameters when using such agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcome of gingival recession therapy using the subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) with or without Er:YAG laser application for root surface biomodification. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty-four teeth in 12 patients with Miller class I and II recession were treated with SCTG with (test group) or without (control group) the application of an Er:YAG laser (2 Hz, 60 mJ/pulse, 40 s, with air spray). Clinical attachment level (CAL), recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), and probing depth (PD) were measured at baseline and 6 months postsurgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between test and control groups (p > 0.05). Postoperatively, significant root coverage, gains in CAL, and highly significant increases in the RW were observed in both groups. For test and control groups, the average root coverage was 80% and 86%, respectively (p > 0.05), and complete root coverage was 75% and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that root surface conditioning with an Er:YAG laser does not enhance the results achieved when SCTG was performed alone.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/AIM: Root surface biomodification has been used to treat gingival recession and periodontitis. The principle for this procedure is that removing the smear layer from the root surfaces exposes collagen fibers, which leads to improved healing. Clinical studies generally have failed to find any improvement in clinical parameters when using such agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcome of gingival recession therapy using the subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) with or without Er:YAG laser application for root surface biomodification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four teeth in 12 patients with Miller class I and II recession were treated with SCTG with (test group) or without (control group) the application of an Er:YAG laser (2 Hz, 60 mJ/pulse, 40 s, with air spray). Clinical attachment level (CAL), recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), and probing depth (PD) were measured at baseline and 6 months postsurgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between test and control groups (p > 0.05). Postoperatively, significant root coverage, gains in CAL, and highly significant increases in the RW were observed in both groups. For test and control groups, the average root coverage was 80% and 86%, respectively (p > 0.05), and complete root coverage was 75% and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that root surface conditioning with an Er:YAG laser does not enhance the results achieved when SCTG was performed alone.
Authors: Anton Sculean; Frank Schwarz; Mohammad Berakdar; George E Romanos; Nicole B Arweiler; Jürgen Becker Journal: J Periodontol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.993