Literature DB >> 15491341

Behavior of human periodontal ligament cells on CO2 laser irradiated dentinal root surfaces: an in vitro study.

V Pant1, J Dixit, A K Agrawal, P K Seth, A B Pant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro attachment behavior of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts on periodontally involved root surface after conditioning with CO2 laser and to compare its efficacy with chemical conditioning agents, namely tetracycline hydrochloride, citric acid, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and EDTA, using scanning electron microscopy.
METHODS: A total of 84 scaled and root-planed specimens from periodontally involved single-rooted human teeth showing hopeless prognosis were selected and assigned to two groups. One group was lased with a CO2 laser (from 5 cm at 3 W for 0.8, 1.0 and 1.2 s), and the other group was treated with either tetracycline hydrochloride (2.5%), citric acid (saturated solution, pH 1), H2O2 (6%) or EDTA (5%; pH 7.4) for 3 min. The specimens were then seeded with human periodontal ligament fibroblasts, incubated for either 12 h or 24 h, and then the cell attachment behavior was observed.
RESULTS: CO2 laser irradiation for 1.0 s was found to be the most efficient, showing consistently good cell attachment with the highest mean value (15.00 +/- 3.41 cells/10,000 microm2 after incubation for 12 h and 29.17 +/- 2.04 cells/10,000 microm2 after 24 h), followed by irradiation for 0.8 s (13.11 +/- 3.04 cells/10,000 microm2 after incubation for 12 h and 22.91 +/- 7.10 cells/10,000 microm2 after 24 h). Charring was observed following irradiation for 1.2 s. Amongst chemical conditioning agents, citric acid was found to be the most efficient, with a mean cell attachment of 17.82 +/- 2.16 cells/10,000 microm2 after incubation for 12 h and 23.62 +/- 1.94 cells/10,000 microm2 after 24 h. EDTA and H2O2 did not do well in the study.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that CO2 laser irradiation for 1.0 s may promote comparatively better attachment of periodontal ligament fibroblast on dentinal root surfaces than the conventional chemical conditioning agents used in the study. (c)Blackwell Munksgaard 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15491341     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2004.00751.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontal Res        ISSN: 0022-3484            Impact factor:   4.419


  10 in total

1.  Aesthetic management of gingival recession by root biomodification with carbon dioxide laser and subepithelial connective tissue graft with lateral repositioned flap technique.

Authors:  Pavitra Kumar Rastogi; Nand Lal; Nimit Garg; Vishal Anand; Rameshwari Singhal
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-07-09

2.  Root surface biomodification with an Er:YAG laser for the treatment of gingival recession with subepithelial connective tissue grafts.

Authors:  Alparslan Dilsiz; Tugba Aydin; M Selim Yavuz
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Root surface biomodification with Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of gingival recession with subepithelial connective tissue grafts.

Authors:  Alparslan Dilsiz; Tugba Aydin; Varol Canakci; Yasin Cicek
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 4.  Dental Fluorosis and Periodontium: an Original Research Report of In Vitro and In Vivo Institutional Studies.

Authors:  K L Vandana; B Srishti Raj; Rajendra Desai
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  A Low-Level Carbon Dioxide Laser Promotes Fibroblast Proliferation and Migration through Activation of Akt, ERK, and JNK.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Shingyochi; Shigeyuki Kanazawa; Satoshi Tajima; Rica Tanaka; Hiroshi Mizuno; Morikuni Tobita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of Er,Cr (YSGG Laser Root Conditioning on the Success of Root Coverage with Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft): A Randomized Clinical Trial with a 6-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Banafsheh Poormoradi; Parviz Torkzaban; Leila Gholami; Amirarsalan Hooshyarfard; Maryam Farhadian
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-07

Review 7.  In Vitro Cytological Responses against Laser Photobiomodulation for Periodontal Regeneration.

Authors:  Yujin Ohsugi; Hiromi Niimi; Tsuyoshi Shimohira; Masahiro Hatasa; Sayaka Katagiri; Akira Aoki; Takanori Iwata
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Comparative in vitro SEM study of a novel root canal irrigant-MTAD and conventional root biomodifiers on periodontally involved human teeth.

Authors:  Charu Tandon; Vivek Govila; Vandana Aditya Pant; Ajita Meenawat
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2015 May-Jun

9.  An in vitro scanning electron microscope study to evaluate the efficacy of various root conditioning agents.

Authors:  Jaishree Garg; Rajkumar Maurya; Ankur Gupta; Pradeep Tandon; Krishna Kumar Gupta; Amitabh Srivastava
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

10.  Fluorosed fibroblast attachment on fluorosed and nonfluorosed teeth after SRP and EDTA root biomodification.

Authors:  Neha Girotra; K L Vandana
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2014-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.