Literature DB >> 19780071

Potential of (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging to segregate patients who are likely to show malignancy of the peripheral zone of the prostate on biopsy.

Virendra Kumar1, Naranamangalam R Jagannathan, Rajeev Kumar, Rishi Nayyar, Sanjay Thulkar, Siddhartha D Gupta, Ashok K Hemal, Narmada P Gupta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) to segregate patients who, upon prostate biopsy, are more likely to show a malignancy in the peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate gland.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Before biopsy, MRSI was carried in 123 men with elevated prostate specific antigen level or an abnormal digital rectal examination. After the MRSI investigation, all patients underwent systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and were categorized using standard random number tables into the following two groups: (i) Group I, a 62 member training set; and (ii) Group II, a 61-member test set. The cutoff value for the [citrate/(choline+creatine)] ratio for patients in the training set was obtained using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method. This value was then applied to the test set of patients as well.
RESULTS: The ROC method gave a cutoff value of 1.2 for the [Citrate/(Choline+Creatine)] ratio. When applied as a malignancy-predictor to the test group of patients (Group II), the ROC method generated the following results: sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 83%; negative predictive value, 93%; positive predictive value, 55% and accuracy, 82%.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that patients who are deemed as malignancy-positive in the PZ by MRSI using the ROC cutoff may be subjected to prostate biopsy to confirm the diagnosis of cancer. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19780071     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a promising tool for the diagnostics of human prostate cancer?

Authors:  Johannes Kurth; Elita Defeo; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  [The relevance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection and exclusion of prostate cancer].

Authors:  J Stattaus; M Forsting
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  A decade in prostate cancer: from NMR to metabolomics.

Authors:  Elita M DeFeo; Chin-Lee Wu; W Scott McDougal; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results.

Authors:  Nicola L Robertson; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  A positive magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with negative initial biopsy may predict future detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi; Virendra Kumar; Tarun Javali; Amit K Dinda; Sanjay Thulkar; Naranmangalam R Jagannathan; Rajeev Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.