Literature DB >> 19779860

Tips and tricks: haemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure.

Giovanni Milito1, Federica Cadeddu.   

Abstract

Haemorrhoidectomy is frequently associated with significant postoperative pain and prolonged hospital stay. New techniques to reduce these problems are constantly under evaluation. Amongst these, LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy is a safe and fast technique that fulfils the requirements of low-complication rate, fast wound healing and quick return to work, reduction in postoperative pain and hospitalisation. The authors detail all the steps of the surgical procedure: operative position; haemorrhoids exposure; dissection, vascular pedicle legation and haemorrhoidal removal, final control. Besides this, the attention is focused on the technical features of LigaSure technology, given that understanding of technical background is a prerequisite for adequate handling of the LigaSure device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19779860     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-009-0530-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  15 in total

1.  Randomised trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with the diathermy dissection operation.

Authors:  G Milito; M Gargiani; F Cortese
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes of randomized controlled trials of LigaSure vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Emile K Tan; Julie Cornish; Ara W Darzi; Savas Papagrigoriadis; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-12

3.  A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; C R G Cohen; M A Kamm; R K S Phillips
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  D G Jayne; I Botterill; N S Ambrose; T G Brennan; P J Guillou; D S O'Riordain
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  K S Ho; Y H Ho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure vs conventional excisional techniques: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  G Milito; F Cadeddu; M G Muzi; C Nigro; A M Farinon
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Open compared with closed haemorrhoidectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Y H Ho; P G Buettner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Randomized controlled trial of LigaSure with submucosal dissection versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Jaw-Yuan Wang; Chien-Yu Lu; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Fang-Ming Chen; Che-Jen Huang; Yu-Sheng Huang; Tsung-Jen Huang; Jan-Sing Hsieh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Randomized, clinical trial of Ligasure vs conventional diathermy in hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Ernest J Franklin; Seema Seetharam; Jennifer Lowney; Paul G Horgan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Randomized clinical trial of LigaSure and conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M G Muzi; G Milito; C Nigro; F Cadeddu; F Andreoli; D Amabile; A M Farinon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and validation of a practical score to predict pain after excisional hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Francesco Selvaggi; Gianluca Pellino; Guido Sciaudone; Giuseppe Candilio; Silvestro Canonico
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.