Literature DB >> 11952582

Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy.

D G Jayne1, I Botterill, N S Ambrose, T G Brennan, P J Guillou, D S O'Riordain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhoidectomy is frequently associated with postoperative pain and prolonged hospital stay. A new technique of haemorrhoidectomy using the Ligasure device suited to day-case surgery is described. This technique was compared with conventional open diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.
METHODS: Forty patients with grade III or IV haemorrhoids were randomized to Ligasure (group 1) or conventional diathermy (group 2) haemorrhoidectomy. Operative details were recorded and patients recorded daily pain scores on a linear analogue scale. Follow-up was at 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks to evaluate complications, return to normal activity, ongoing symptoms and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: Reduced intraoperative blood loss (median (range) 0 (0-5) ml versus 20 (12-22) ml; P < 0.001) and a shorter operating time (10 (8-11) versus 20 (18-25) min; P < 0.001) was observed in group 1 compared with group 2. More patients in group 1 were discharged on the day of operation (18 of 20 versus 11 of 20; P < 0.05) and there was a trend towards lower postoperative pain scores on day 1 (group 1 median 5 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 2.6 to 6.8) versus group 2 7 (95 per cent c.i. 4.2 to 7.7); P = 0.36). There was no difference between the two groups in the degree of patient satisfaction or number of postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION: Ligasure diathermy may be used safely in the treatment of patients with grade III or IV haemorrhoids. It reduces intraoperative blood loss and operating time, and facilitates same-day discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11952582     DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2002.02056.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  28 in total

1.  Radiofrequency versus conventional diathermy Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Luana Franceschilli; Vito M Stolfi; Stefano D' Ugo; Giulio P Angelucci; Sara Lazzaro; Emanuele Picone; Achille Gaspari; Pierpaolo Sileri
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure™ compared to conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Petra F Janssen; Hans A M Brölmann; Paul J M van Kesteren; Marlies Y Bongers; Andreas L Thurkow; Martijn W Heymans; Judith A F Huirne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure.

Authors:  Theodore Diamantis; Michael Kontos; Antonios Arvelakis; Spiridon Syroukis; Dimitris Koronarchis; Apostolos Papalois; Emmanuel Agapitos; Elias Bastounis; Andreas C Lazaris
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Pei-Jing Cui; Hua-Zhong Han; Da-Nian Tong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Liver transection using the LigaSure sealing system.

Authors:  A Saiura; J Yamamoto; R Koga; M Seki; T Yamaguchi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Tips and tricks: haemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure.

Authors:  Giovanni Milito; Federica Cadeddu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  Ambulatory haemorrhoidal surgery: systematic literature review and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  B Vinson-Bonnet; T Higuero; J L Faucheron; A Senejoux; F Pigot; L Siproudhis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Randomized trial comparing LigaSure to closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M Fareed; Saleh El-Awady; H Abd-El monaem; A Aly
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Randomized clinical trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with open diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  K-Y Tan; T Zin; H-L Sim; P-L Poon; A Cheng; K Mak
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.