Literature DB >> 19779447

Violation of Bell's inequality in Josephson phase qubits.

Markus Ansmann1, H Wang, Radoslaw C Bialczak, Max Hofheinz, Erik Lucero, M Neeley, A D O'Connell, D Sank, M Weides, J Wenner, A N Cleland, John M Martinis.   

Abstract

The measurement process plays an awkward role in quantum mechanics, because measurement forces a system to 'choose' between possible outcomes in a fundamentally unpredictable manner. Therefore, hidden classical processes have been considered as possibly predetermining measurement outcomes while preserving their statistical distributions. However, a quantitative measure that can distinguish classically determined correlations from stronger quantum correlations exists in the form of the Bell inequalities, measurements of which provide strong experimental evidence that quantum mechanics provides a complete description. Here we demonstrate the violation of a Bell inequality in a solid-state system. We use a pair of Josephson phase qubits acting as spin-1/2 particles, and show that the qubits can be entangled and measured so as to violate the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) version of the Bell inequality. We measure a Bell signal of 2.0732 +/- 0.0003, exceeding the maximum amplitude of 2 for a classical system by 244 standard deviations. In the experiment, we deterministically generate the entangled state, and measure both qubits in a single-shot manner, closing the detection loophole. Because the Bell inequality was designed to test for non-classical behaviour without assuming the applicability of quantum mechanics to the system in question, this experiment provides further strong evidence that a macroscopic electrical circuit is really a quantum system.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19779447     DOI: 10.1038/nature08363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  14 in total

1.  Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection.

Authors:  M A Rowe; D Kielpinski; V Meyer; C A Sackett; W M Itano; C Monroe; D J Wineland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Bell states of atoms with ultralong lifetimes and their tomographic state analysis.

Authors:  C F Roos; G P T Lancaster; M Riebe; H Häffner; W Hänsel; S Gulde; C Becher; J Eschner; F Schmidt-Kaler; R Blatt
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Observation of quantum oscillations between a Josephson phase qubit and a microscopic resonator using fast readout.

Authors:  K B Cooper; Matthias Steffen; R McDermott; R W Simmonds; Seongshik Oh; D A Hite; D P Pappas; John M Martinis
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-10-25       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Measurement of the entanglement of two superconducting qubits via state tomography.

Authors:  Matthias Steffen; M Ansmann; Radoslaw C Bialczak; N Katz; Erik Lucero; R McDermott; Matthew Neeley; E M Weig; A N Cleland; John M Martinis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  1/f Flux noise in Josephson phase qubits.

Authors:  Radoslaw C Bialczak; R McDermott; M Ansmann; M Hofheinz; N Katz; Erik Lucero; Matthew Neeley; A D O'Connell; H Wang; A N Cleland; John M Martinis
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Coherent quantum state storage and transfer between two phase qubits via a resonant cavity.

Authors:  Mika A Sillanpää; Jae I Park; Raymond W Simmonds
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus.

Authors:  J Majer; J M Chow; J M Gambetta; Jens Koch; B R Johnson; J A Schreier; L Frunzio; D I Schuster; A A Houck; A Wallraff; A Blais; M H Devoret; S M Girvin; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  High-fidelity gates in a single josephson qubit.

Authors:  Erik Lucero; M Hofheinz; M Ansmann; Radoslaw C Bialczak; N Katz; Matthew Neeley; A D O'Connell; H Wang; A N Cleland; John M Martinis
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Superconducting quantum bits.

Authors:  John Clarke; Frank K Wilhelm
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Bell inequality violation with two remote atomic qubits.

Authors:  D N Matsukevich; P Maunz; D L Moehring; S Olmschenk; C Monroe
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 9.161

View more
  23 in total

1.  Coherent coupling of a superconducting flux qubit to an electron spin ensemble in diamond.

Authors:  Xiaobo Zhu; Shiro Saito; Alexander Kemp; Kosuke Kakuyanagi; Shin-ichi Karimoto; Hayato Nakano; William J Munro; Yasuhiro Tokura; Mark S Everitt; Kae Nemoto; Makoto Kasu; Norikazu Mizuochi; Kouichi Semba
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Quantum entanglement between an optical photon and a solid-state spin qubit.

Authors:  E Togan; Y Chu; A S Trifonov; L Jiang; J Maze; L Childress; M V G Dutt; A S Sørensen; P R Hemmer; A S Zibrov; M D Lukin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator.

Authors:  A D O'Connell; M Hofheinz; M Ansmann; Radoslaw C Bialczak; M Lenander; Erik Lucero; M Neeley; D Sank; H Wang; M Weides; J Wenner; John M Martinis; A N Cleland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Violation of local realism with freedom of choice.

Authors:  Thomas Scheidl; Rupert Ursin; Johannes Kofler; Sven Ramelow; Xiao-Song Ma; Thomas Herbst; Lothar Ratschbacher; Alessandro Fedrizzi; Nathan K Langford; Thomas Jennewein; Anton Zeilinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Preparation and measurement of three-qubit entanglement in a superconducting circuit.

Authors:  L Dicarlo; M D Reed; L Sun; B R Johnson; J M Chow; J M Gambetta; L Frunzio; S M Girvin; M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Generation of three-qubit entangled states using superconducting phase qubits.

Authors:  Matthew Neeley; Radoslaw C Bialczak; M Lenander; E Lucero; Matteo Mariantoni; A D O'Connell; D Sank; H Wang; M Weides; J Wenner; Y Yin; T Yamamoto; A N Cleland; John M Martinis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Probing the interface theory of perception: Reply to commentaries.

Authors:  Donald D Hoffman; Manish Singh; Chetan Prakash
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

8.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres.

Authors:  B Hensen; H Bernien; A E Dréau; A Reiserer; N Kalb; M S Blok; J Ruitenberg; R F L Vermeulen; R N Schouten; C Abellán; W Amaya; V Pruneri; M W Mitchell; M Markham; D J Twitchen; D Elkouss; S Wehner; T H Taminiau; R Hanson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Bell's inequality violation with spins in silicon.

Authors:  Juan P Dehollain; Stephanie Simmons; Juha T Muhonen; Rachpon Kalra; Arne Laucht; Fay Hudson; Kohei M Itoh; David N Jamieson; Jeffrey C McCallum; Andrew S Dzurak; Andrea Morello
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Quantum computers.

Authors:  T D Ladd; F Jelezko; R Laflamme; Y Nakamura; C Monroe; J L O'Brien
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.